• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双任务干扰对早期知觉加工的影响。

Dual task interference on early perceptual processing.

机构信息

Département de psychologie, Université de Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.

Département de Psychoéducation et de Psychologie, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Gatineau, Québec, Canada.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 May;83(4):1777-1795. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02158-0. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-020-02158-0
PMID:33083993
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8084822/
Abstract

When two tasks, Task 1 and Task 2, are conducted in close temporal proximity and a separate speeded response is required for each target (T1 and T2), T2 report performance decreases as a function of its temporal proximity to T1. This so-called psychological refractory period (PRP) effect on T2 processing is largely assumed to reflect interference from T1 response selection on T2 response selection. However, interference on early perceptual processing of T2 has been observed in a modified paradigm, which required changes in visual-spatial attention, sensory modality, task modality, and response modality across targets. The goal of the present study was to investigate the possibility of early perceptual interference by systematically and iteratively removing each of these possible non perceptual confounds, in a series of four experiments. To assess T2 visual memory consolidation success, T2 was presented for a varying duration and immediately masked. T2 report accuracy, which was taken as a measure of perceptual-encoding or consolidation-success, decreased across all experimental control conditions as T1-T2 onset proximity increased. We argue that our results, in light of previous studies, show that central processing of a first target, responsible for the classical PRP effect, also interferes with early perceptual processing of a second target. We end with a discussion of broader implications for psychological refractory period and attentional blink effects.

摘要

当两个任务,任务 1 和任务 2,在时间上非常接近进行,并且每个目标(T1 和 T2)都需要单独的快速反应时,T2 的报告表现会随着其与 T1 的时间接近而下降。这种所谓的 T2 处理的心理不应期(PRP)效应,在很大程度上被认为反映了 T1 反应选择对 T2 反应选择的干扰。然而,在一个修改后的范式中,已经观察到 T2 的早期感知处理中的干扰,该范式要求在目标之间改变视觉空间注意、感觉模态、任务模态和反应模态。本研究的目的是通过在一系列四个实验中系统地和迭代地消除这些可能的非感知混淆,来研究早期感知干扰的可能性。为了评估 T2 视觉记忆巩固的成功,T2 呈现了不同的持续时间,并立即进行了掩蔽。T2 的报告准确性,作为感知编码或巩固成功的衡量标准,在所有实验控制条件下,随着 T1-T2 起始接近度的增加而下降。我们认为,根据先前的研究,我们的结果表明,第一个目标的中央处理,负责经典的 PRP 效应,也会干扰第二个目标的早期感知处理。最后,我们讨论了心理不应期和注意眨眼效应的更广泛的意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/ec239306b812/13414_2020_2158_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/f81e6aaeb722/13414_2020_2158_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/6a08af75a837/13414_2020_2158_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/533330ddd7e2/13414_2020_2158_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/69b2f8276d7a/13414_2020_2158_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/248178374693/13414_2020_2158_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/f4da42a6e69c/13414_2020_2158_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/f34739d732ed/13414_2020_2158_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/ec239306b812/13414_2020_2158_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/f81e6aaeb722/13414_2020_2158_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/6a08af75a837/13414_2020_2158_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/533330ddd7e2/13414_2020_2158_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/69b2f8276d7a/13414_2020_2158_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/248178374693/13414_2020_2158_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/f4da42a6e69c/13414_2020_2158_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/f34739d732ed/13414_2020_2158_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2a9e/8084822/ec239306b812/13414_2020_2158_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Dual task interference on early perceptual processing.双任务干扰对早期知觉加工的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 May;83(4):1777-1795. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02158-0. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
2
Stimulus localization interferes with stimulus recognition: evidence from an attentional blink paradigm.刺激定位干扰刺激识别:来自注意瞬脱范式的证据。
J Vis. 2013 Jun 11;13(7):7. doi: 10.1167/13.7.7.
3
The attentional blink: why does Lag-1 sparing occur when the dependent measure is accuracy, but Lag-1 deficit when it is RT?注意瞬脱:为什么当因变量是准确性时会出现滞后 1 节省,但当因变量是 RT 时会出现滞后 1 缺失?
Psychol Res. 2019 Nov;83(8):1778-1797. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1026-3. Epub 2018 May 26.
4
Perceptual load modulates the processing of distractors presented at task-irrelevant locations during the attentional blink.知觉负载调节注意瞬脱期间出现在任务无关位置的干扰项的加工。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2010 Nov;72(8):2106-14. doi: 10.3758/bf03196687.
5
Neither backward masking of T2 nor task switching is necessary for the attentional blink.注意瞬脱既不需要 T2 的反向掩蔽,也不需要任务转换。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2011 Feb;18(1):70-5. doi: 10.3758/s13423-010-0015-3.
6
Separate and shared sources of dual-task cost in stimulus identification and response selection.刺激识别和反应选择中双重任务成本的独立和共享来源。
Cogn Psychol. 2002 Mar;44(2):105-47. doi: 10.1006/cogp.2001.0762.
7
Dual-task interference and response strategies in simulated car driving: impact of first-task characteristics on the psychological refractory period effect.模拟驾驶中的双重任务干扰和反应策略:第一任务特征对心理不应期效应的影响。
Psychol Res. 2021 Mar;85(2):568-576. doi: 10.1007/s00426-019-01272-5. Epub 2019 Nov 27.
8
The influence of training on the attentional blink and psychological refractory period.训练对注意瞬脱和心理不应期的影响。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 May;76(4):979-99. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0638-y.
9
The attentional blink: a review of data and theory.注意瞬脱:数据与理论综述
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2009 Nov;71(8):1683-700. doi: 10.3758/APP.71.8.1683.
10
Modality-specific and amodal sources of interference in the attentional blink.注意瞬脱中特定模态和非模态干扰源
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Aug;70(6):1000-15. doi: 10.3758/pp.70.6.1000.

引用本文的文献

1
The benefit of choice on task performance: Reduced difficulty effects in free-choice versus forced-choice tasks.选择对任务表现的益处:自由选择任务与强制选择任务中难度效应的降低
Mem Cognit. 2025 May;53(4):1162-1177. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01641-5. Epub 2024 Oct 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Dual-Task Interference on Early and Late Stages of Facial Emotion Detection Is Revealed by Human Electrophysiology.人类电生理学揭示了面部情绪检测早期和晚期阶段的双任务干扰。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2019 Nov 8;13:391. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00391. eCollection 2019.
2
Dual-task interference on left eye utilization during facial emotion perception.在面部情绪感知过程中,左眼使用的双重任务干扰。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Oct;45(10):1319-1330. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000674. Epub 2019 Jul 1.
3
Concurrent deployment of visual attention and response selection bottleneck in a dual-task: Electrophysiological and behavioural evidence.
双重任务中视觉注意与反应选择瓶颈的并发部署:电生理和行为学证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2017 Dec;70(12):2460-2477. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1245348. Epub 2016 Nov 2.
4
Age-related emotional bias in processing two emotionally valenced tasks.处理两项具有情感效价任务时与年龄相关的情感偏差
Psychol Res. 2017 Jan;81(1):289-308. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0711-8. Epub 2015 Oct 20.
5
Failure of temporal selectivity: Electrophysiological evidence for (mis)selection of distractors during the attentional blink.时间选择性的失败:注意瞬脱期间对干扰项(错误)选择的电生理证据。
Psychophysiology. 2015 Jul;52(7):933-41. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12426. Epub 2015 Apr 9.
6
Are processing limitations of visual attention and response selection subject to the same bottleneck in dual-tasks?在双重任务中,视觉注意力的处理限制和反应选择是否受同一个瓶颈的制约?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 May;77(4):1052-69. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0874-9.
7
Task switching mediates direct interference of intertarget distractors in the attentional blink: An event-related potential study.任务切换介导了注意瞬脱中目标间干扰项的直接干扰:一项事件相关电位研究。
Psychophysiology. 2015 Jul;52(7):919-32. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12416. Epub 2015 Feb 25.
8
The attentional blink impairs detection and delays encoding of visual information: evidence from human electrophysiology.注意瞬脱会损害视觉信息的检测并延迟其编码:来自人类电生理学的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Apr;27(4):720-35. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00752. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
9
The locus of the emotional Stroop effect: a study with the PRP paradigm.情绪性斯特鲁普效应的轨迹:一项采用PRP范式的研究
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2014 Sep;151:8-15. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.05.011. Epub 2014 Jun 4.
10
The root cause of the attentional blink: first-target processing or disruption of input control?注意瞬脱的根本原因:对首个目标的处理还是输入控制的中断?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2012 Nov;74(8):1606-22. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0361-5.