• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

验证一种定量水生表面微层中存在的微纤维的方法。

Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers.

机构信息

Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.

Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 21;10(1):17892. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74635-3.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-020-74635-3
PMID:33087751
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7578636/
Abstract

Many of the methods for microplastics quantification in the environment are criticised creating problems with data validity. Quantification of microplastics in the surface microlayer of aquatic environments using glass plate dipping holds promise as a simple field method, but its efficiency has yet to be validated. We tested a standard glass plate dipping method to assess recovery of four common polymer microfibres and two common natural fibres, under three different salinities (freshwater, brackish water, saltwater). Overall recovery rates were low (26.8 ± 1.54%) but higher recoveries were observed under saltwater treatments (36.5 ± 3.01%) than brackish water (24.5 ± 1.92%) or freshwater (19.3 ± 1.92%). The fibre types showed different recovery rates, with acrylic yielding significantly higher recovery rates (37.0 ± 2.71%) than other fibres across treatments. No clear relationship between the density of the fibres and the recovery efficiency was seen. We suggest that, where this method is used for monitoring microplastics, the results will typically underestimate the total amount present, but that recovery is sufficiently consistent to allow comparison of differences between sampling locations. When comparing data across river-estuarine or similar transects salinity should be monitored to account for salinity-induced differences in sampling recovery.

摘要

许多用于环境中微塑料定量的方法都受到了批评,这些方法导致数据有效性存在问题。使用玻璃平板浸没法对水生环境的表面微层中的微塑料进行定量,这是一种很有前景的简单现场方法,但它的效率尚未得到验证。我们测试了一种标准的玻璃平板浸没法,以评估在三种不同盐度(淡水、微咸水、咸水)下,对四种常见聚合物微纤维和两种常见天然纤维的回收情况。总体回收率较低(26.8±1.54%),但在咸水环境下(36.5±3.01%)的回收率高于微咸水环境(24.5±1.92%)或淡水环境(19.3±1.92%)。纤维类型的回收率不同,丙烯腈纤维在所有处理中的回收率明显更高(37.0±2.71%)。纤维密度与回收率之间没有明显的关系。我们建议,在使用这种方法监测微塑料时,结果通常会低估实际存在的微塑料总量,但回收率足够一致,可以比较不同采样点之间的差异。在对河流-河口或类似的横断面上的数据进行比较时,应监测盐度,以解释因盐度导致的采样回收率差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd1/7578636/92bddce23f99/41598_2020_74635_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd1/7578636/23cdb506576c/41598_2020_74635_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd1/7578636/ed5515b461f2/41598_2020_74635_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd1/7578636/92bddce23f99/41598_2020_74635_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd1/7578636/23cdb506576c/41598_2020_74635_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd1/7578636/ed5515b461f2/41598_2020_74635_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dd1/7578636/92bddce23f99/41598_2020_74635_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Validation of a method to quantify microfibres present in aquatic surface microlayers.验证一种定量水生表面微层中存在的微纤维的方法。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 21;10(1):17892. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74635-3.
2
A rapid method for assessing the accumulation of microplastics in the sea surface microlayer (SML) of estuarine systems.一种快速评估河口系统海表微层(SML)中微塑料积累的方法。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 21;8(1):9428. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27612-w.
3
Sampling microfibres at the sea surface: The effects of mesh size, sample volume and water depth.海面微纤维采样:网孔大小、采样体积和水深的影响。
Environ Pollut. 2020 Mar;258:113413. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113413. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
4
The contamination of inland waters by microplastic fibres under different anthropogenic pressure: Preliminary study in Central Europe (Poland).内陆水域受不同人为压力下微塑料纤维的污染:中欧(波兰)的初步研究。
Waste Manag Res. 2020 Nov;38(11):1231-1238. doi: 10.1177/0734242X20938448. Epub 2020 Jul 11.
5
Seasonal variations of nitrous oxide fluxes and soil denitrification rates in subtropical freshwater and brackish tidal marshes of the Min River estuary.亚热带淡水和半咸潮河口米河流域湿地一氧化二氮通量和土壤反硝化速率的季节性变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Mar;616-617:1404-1413. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.175. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
6
Salinity tolerances and use of saline environments by freshwater turtles: implications of sea level rise.淡水龟的耐盐性和对咸水环境的利用:海平面上升的影响。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 Aug;93(3):1634-1648. doi: 10.1111/brv.12410. Epub 2018 Mar 25.
7
Adaptation of a laboratory protocol to quantity microplastics contamination in estuarine waters.调整实验室方案以量化河口水中的微塑料污染。
MethodsX. 2019 Apr 4;6:740-749. doi: 10.1016/j.mex.2019.03.027. eCollection 2019.
8
Microplastics ingestion by a common tropical freshwater fishing resource.食用常见热带淡水捕捞资源中的微塑料。
Environ Pollut. 2017 Feb;221:218-226. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.11.068. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
9
Microfibres from apparel and home textiles: Prospects for including microplastics in environmental sustainability assessment.服装和家用纺织品中的微纤维:将微塑料纳入环境可持续性评估的前景。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Feb 20;652:483-494. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.166. Epub 2018 Oct 12.
10
Assessment of microplastics in freshwater systems: A review.淡水系统中微塑料的评估:综述。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Mar 10;707:135578. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135578. Epub 2019 Nov 20.

引用本文的文献

1
Applying appropriate frequency criteria to advance acoustic behavioural guidance systems for fish.应用适当的频率标准来推进鱼类声学行为引导系统。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 18;13(1):8075. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33423-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of density and salinity on larval development of salt-adapted and salt-naïve frog populations.密度和盐度对适应盐环境和未适应盐环境的青蛙种群幼体发育的影响。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Feb 5;10(5):2436-2445. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6069. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Microplastics in freshwaters and drinking water: Critical review and assessment of data quality.淡水和饮用水中的微塑料:数据质量的批判性回顾和评估。
Water Res. 2019 May 15;155:410-422. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.054. Epub 2019 Feb 28.
3
Microplastics: Finding a consensus on the definition.
微塑料:定义达成共识。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2019 Jan;138:145-147. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.11.022. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
4
Are We Speaking the Same Language? Recommendations for a Definition and Categorization Framework for Plastic Debris.我们是否使用同一种语言? 对塑料碎片的定义和分类框架的建议。
Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Feb 5;53(3):1039-1047. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.8b05297. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
5
Microplastics in the aquatic environment: Evidence for or against adverse impacts and major knowledge gaps.水生态环境中的微塑料:危害证据与知识缺口
Environ Toxicol Chem. 2018 Nov;37(11):2776-2796. doi: 10.1002/etc.4268. Epub 2018 Oct 16.
6
A rapid method for assessing the accumulation of microplastics in the sea surface microlayer (SML) of estuarine systems.一种快速评估河口系统海表微层(SML)中微塑料积累的方法。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jun 21;8(1):9428. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27612-w.
7
Microplastic analysis in the South Funen Archipelago, Baltic Sea, implementing manta trawling and bulk sampling.在波罗的海南菲英群岛实施使用帘式拖网和散装取样进行微塑料分析。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 Mar;128:601-608. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.01.066. Epub 2018 Feb 12.
8
Microplastic in two South Carolina Estuaries: Occurrence, distribution, and composition.南卡罗来纳州两个河口的微塑料:出现、分布和组成。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2018 Mar;128:223-233. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.01.030. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
9
Marine environment microfiber contamination: Global patterns and the diversity of microparticle origins.海洋环境微纤维污染:全球分布模式及微粒起源的多样性。
Environ Pollut. 2018 Jun;237:275-284. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2018.02.062. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
10
Sinking rates of microplastics and potential implications of their alteration by physical, biological, and chemical factors.微塑料的沉降速率及其受物理、生物和化学因素影响而发生变化的潜在影响。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2016 Aug 15;109(1):310-319. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.05.064. Epub 2016 Jun 11.