Faculty of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Southampton, Highfield Campus, University Road, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 21;10(1):17892. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74635-3.
Many of the methods for microplastics quantification in the environment are criticised creating problems with data validity. Quantification of microplastics in the surface microlayer of aquatic environments using glass plate dipping holds promise as a simple field method, but its efficiency has yet to be validated. We tested a standard glass plate dipping method to assess recovery of four common polymer microfibres and two common natural fibres, under three different salinities (freshwater, brackish water, saltwater). Overall recovery rates were low (26.8 ± 1.54%) but higher recoveries were observed under saltwater treatments (36.5 ± 3.01%) than brackish water (24.5 ± 1.92%) or freshwater (19.3 ± 1.92%). The fibre types showed different recovery rates, with acrylic yielding significantly higher recovery rates (37.0 ± 2.71%) than other fibres across treatments. No clear relationship between the density of the fibres and the recovery efficiency was seen. We suggest that, where this method is used for monitoring microplastics, the results will typically underestimate the total amount present, but that recovery is sufficiently consistent to allow comparison of differences between sampling locations. When comparing data across river-estuarine or similar transects salinity should be monitored to account for salinity-induced differences in sampling recovery.
许多用于环境中微塑料定量的方法都受到了批评,这些方法导致数据有效性存在问题。使用玻璃平板浸没法对水生环境的表面微层中的微塑料进行定量,这是一种很有前景的简单现场方法,但它的效率尚未得到验证。我们测试了一种标准的玻璃平板浸没法,以评估在三种不同盐度(淡水、微咸水、咸水)下,对四种常见聚合物微纤维和两种常见天然纤维的回收情况。总体回收率较低(26.8±1.54%),但在咸水环境下(36.5±3.01%)的回收率高于微咸水环境(24.5±1.92%)或淡水环境(19.3±1.92%)。纤维类型的回收率不同,丙烯腈纤维在所有处理中的回收率明显更高(37.0±2.71%)。纤维密度与回收率之间没有明显的关系。我们建议,在使用这种方法监测微塑料时,结果通常会低估实际存在的微塑料总量,但回收率足够一致,可以比较不同采样点之间的差异。在对河流-河口或类似的横断面上的数据进行比较时,应监测盐度,以解释因盐度导致的采样回收率差异。