Cohen N, Modai D, Rosen A, Golik A, Weissgarten J
Department of Medicine A, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Zerifin, Israel.
J Clin Gastroenterol. 1987 Aug;9(4):447-51.
Whether barium retained in the appendix can be a cause of acute appendicitis is debatable. We describe a 40-year-old man who developed nonspecific right abdominal pain 7 weeks after a barium enema, which proved to be normal. On abdominal film a distended appendix containing barium was seen, and at laparotomy acute appendicitis was present. Thus far, 26 cases of "barium appendicitis" have been reported. On the basis of the relevant literature and the cases collected, it is appropriate to draw the following conclusions: 1) With present knowledge it is not possible to state whether retained barium plays any etiologic role in the development of subsequent uncomplicated acute appendicitis. 2) If a later appendicitis does supervene, it carries a high risk of being complicated; barium seems to be responsible for the complication. 3) The longer the interval between the barium study and the subsequent appearance of acute appendicitis, the higher will be the risk of complications.
阑尾内残留的钡剂是否会引发急性阑尾炎仍存在争议。我们描述了一名40岁男性,在钡剂灌肠检查7周后出现非特异性右下腹疼痛,钡剂灌肠检查结果正常。腹部X光片显示阑尾扩张并含有钡剂,剖腹探查时发现为急性阑尾炎。迄今为止,已报告了26例“钡剂性阑尾炎”病例。根据相关文献及收集的病例,可得出以下结论:1)就目前所知,无法确定残留钡剂在随后发生的单纯性急性阑尾炎的发病过程中是否起病因作用。2)如果随后确实发生阑尾炎,其发生并发症的风险很高;钡剂似乎是导致并发症的原因。3)钡剂检查与随后出现急性阑尾炎之间的间隔时间越长,并发症的风险就越高。