Smith Toby O, Kamper Steven J, Williams Christopher M, Lee Hopin
Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Facility of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
Musculoskeletal Care. 2020 Oct 14. doi: 10.1002/msc.1520.
Social deprivation is broadly defined as the restriction of access an individual has to social or cultural interactions due to poverty, discrimination or other disadvantages. While social deprivation is a widely acknowledged determinant of outcome in musculoskeletal conditions, it remains unclear how this is considered in the conduct and interpretation of musculoskeletal trials.
To determine the frequently to which measures of social deprivation are reported in trials recruiting people with musculoskeletal diseases.
We conducted a Pubmed search of randomised controlled trials published between 01 January 2019 and 01 June 2020. We included full-text papers of trials recruiting people with musculoskeletal diseases, irrespective of intervention type or origin. We extracted data relating to trial characteristics, setting, trial design, funding source and musculoskeletal disease. We extracted data on any reported social deprivation index or measure of social deprivation based on internationally adopted indicators. We analysed data descriptively to summarise the reporting of each social deprivation index and measure of social deprivation within trials.
From 2133 potentially eligible citations, 402 were eligible. Mean age of participants was 51.7 years; 63% were female. Trials most frequently recruited people with spinal pain (24.6%) or osteoarthritis (10.0%). Two trials (0.5%) reported social deprivation indices/scores. When assessed by discrete measures of social deprivation, 164 trials (40.8%) reported one or more social deprivation measures. The most commonly reported measures were morbidity (20.2%), employment status (17.7%) and educational attainment (15.5%). Race (6.7%), ethnicity (6.2%) and annual salary (1.3%) were infrequently reported. One trial (0.3%) presented subgroup results by social deprivation measures.
Social deprivation is inconsistently reported in musculoskeletal trials. Trialists should report baseline measures of social deprivation in trial reports and aid generalisability to target population, and to examine whether social deprivation might modify treatment effects of interventions for musculoskeletal conditions.
社会剥夺被广泛定义为个人由于贫困、歧视或其他不利因素而在社会或文化互动方面受到的限制。虽然社会剥夺是肌肉骨骼疾病预后的一个广泛认可的决定因素,但在肌肉骨骼试验的开展和解释中如何考虑这一因素仍不清楚。
确定在招募肌肉骨骼疾病患者的试验中报告社会剥夺测量指标的频率。
我们对2019年1月1日至2020年6月1日期间发表的随机对照试验进行了PubMed检索。我们纳入了招募肌肉骨骼疾病患者的试验的全文论文,无论干预类型或来源如何。我们提取了与试验特征、环境、试验设计、资金来源和肌肉骨骼疾病相关的数据。我们根据国际采用的指标提取了任何报告的社会剥夺指数或社会剥夺测量指标的数据。我们对数据进行描述性分析,以总结试验中每个社会剥夺指数和社会剥夺测量指标的报告情况。
从2133条潜在合格文献中,有402条合格。参与者的平均年龄为51.7岁;63%为女性。试验最常招募的是患有脊柱疼痛(24.6%)或骨关节炎(10.0%)的患者。两项试验(0.5%)报告了社会剥夺指数/分数。当通过社会剥夺的离散测量指标进行评估时,164项试验(40.8%)报告了一项或多项社会剥夺测量指标。最常报告的测量指标是发病率(20.2%)、就业状况(17.7%)和教育程度(15.5%)。种族(6.7%)、民族(6.2%)和年薪(1.3%)很少被报告。一项试验(0.3%)按社会剥夺测量指标呈现了亚组结果。
肌肉骨骼试验中对社会剥夺的报告不一致。试验者应在试验报告中报告社会剥夺的基线测量指标,以帮助推广到目标人群,并检查社会剥夺是否可能改变肌肉骨骼疾病干预措施的治疗效果。