Suppr超能文献

髋关节和膝关节置换术后行为改变物理治疗干预以增加身体活动的随机对照试验:PEP-TALK 试验。

Randomised controlled trial of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity following hip and knee replacement: the PEP-TALK trial.

机构信息

Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2022 May 31;12(5):e061373. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061373.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the effectiveness of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity compared with usual rehabilitation after total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR).

DESIGN

Multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm, open, randomised controlled, superiority trial.

SETTING

National Health Service providers in nine English hospitals.

PARTICIPANTS

224 individuals aged ≥18 years, undergoing a primary THR or TKR deemed 'moderately inactive' or 'inactive'.

INTERVENTION

Participants received either six, 30 min, weekly, group-based exercise sessions (usual care) or the same six weekly, group-based, exercise sessions each preceded by a 30 min cognitive behaviour discussion group aimed at challenging barriers to physical inactivity following surgery (experimental).

RANDOMISATION AND BLINDING

Initial 75 participants were randomised 1:1 before changing the allocation ratio to 2:1 (experimental:usual care). Allocation was based on minimisation, stratifying on comorbidities, operation type and hospital. There was no blinding.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary: University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score at 12 months. Secondary: 6 and 12-month assessed function, pain, self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, psychological distress and quality of life.

RESULTS

Of the 1254 participants assessed for eligibility, 224 were included (139 experimental: 85 usual care). Mean age was 68.4 years (SD: 8.7), 63% were women, 52% underwent TKR. There was no between-group difference in UCLA score (mean difference: -0.03 (95% CI -0.52 to 0.45, p=0.89)). There were no differences observed in any of the secondary outcomes at 6 or 12 months. There were no important adverse events in either group. The COVID-19 pandemic contributed to the reduced intended sample size (target 260) and reduced intervention compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no evidence to suggest attending usual care physiotherapy sessions plus a group-based behaviour change intervention differs to attending usual care physiotherapy alone. As the trial could not reach its intended sample size, nor a proportion of participants receive their intended rehabilitation, this should be interpreted with caution.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN29770908.

摘要

目的

比较全髋关节置换术(THR)或全膝关节置换术(TKR)后,以行为改变为基础的物理治疗干预增加体力活动与常规康复的效果。

设计

多中心、实用、双臂、开放、随机对照、优效性试验。

地点

英国 9 家医院的国家医疗服务提供者。

参与者

224 名年龄≥18 岁的个体,接受初次 THR 或 TKR,被认为是“中度不活跃”或“不活跃”。

干预

参与者接受 6 次、每次 30 分钟、每周一次的小组基础运动课程(常规护理)或相同的 6 次每周小组基础运动课程,每次运动前先进行 30 分钟的认知行为讨论小组,旨在挑战手术后身体不活跃的障碍(实验组)。

随机化和盲法

最初的 75 名参与者在改变分配比例为 2:1(实验组:常规护理)之前按 1:1 随机分配。分配基于最小化,按合并症、手术类型和医院分层。没有盲法。

主要观察指标

主要指标:加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)活动评分在 12 个月时的评分。次要指标:6 个月和 12 个月时的功能、疼痛、自我效能、运动恐惧、心理困扰和生活质量评估。

结果

在评估合格性的 1254 名参与者中,224 名参与者入选(实验组 139 名:常规护理 85 名)。平均年龄为 68.4 岁(标准差:8.7),63%为女性,52%行 TKR。UCLA 评分在组间无差异(平均差异:-0.03(95%CI-0.52 至 0.45,p=0.89))。在 6 个月或 12 个月时,在任何次要结果上均未观察到差异。两组均无重要不良事件。COVID-19 大流行导致预期样本量减少(目标 260)和干预依从性降低。

结论

没有证据表明参加常规护理物理治疗课程加基于小组的行为改变干预与单独参加常规护理物理治疗有区别。由于试验未能达到预期的样本量,也没有达到预期接受康复治疗的参与者比例,因此应谨慎解释结果。

试验注册

ISRCTN29770908。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0099/9157340/333438e82667/bmjopen-2022-061373f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验