Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
School of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.
BMJ Open. 2022 May 31;12(5):e061373. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-061373.
To test the effectiveness of a behaviour change physiotherapy intervention to increase physical activity compared with usual rehabilitation after total hip replacement (THR) or total knee replacement (TKR).
Multicentre, pragmatic, two-arm, open, randomised controlled, superiority trial.
National Health Service providers in nine English hospitals.
224 individuals aged ≥18 years, undergoing a primary THR or TKR deemed 'moderately inactive' or 'inactive'.
Participants received either six, 30 min, weekly, group-based exercise sessions (usual care) or the same six weekly, group-based, exercise sessions each preceded by a 30 min cognitive behaviour discussion group aimed at challenging barriers to physical inactivity following surgery (experimental).
Initial 75 participants were randomised 1:1 before changing the allocation ratio to 2:1 (experimental:usual care). Allocation was based on minimisation, stratifying on comorbidities, operation type and hospital. There was no blinding.
Primary: University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score at 12 months. Secondary: 6 and 12-month assessed function, pain, self-efficacy, kinesiophobia, psychological distress and quality of life.
Of the 1254 participants assessed for eligibility, 224 were included (139 experimental: 85 usual care). Mean age was 68.4 years (SD: 8.7), 63% were women, 52% underwent TKR. There was no between-group difference in UCLA score (mean difference: -0.03 (95% CI -0.52 to 0.45, p=0.89)). There were no differences observed in any of the secondary outcomes at 6 or 12 months. There were no important adverse events in either group. The COVID-19 pandemic contributed to the reduced intended sample size (target 260) and reduced intervention compliance.
There is no evidence to suggest attending usual care physiotherapy sessions plus a group-based behaviour change intervention differs to attending usual care physiotherapy alone. As the trial could not reach its intended sample size, nor a proportion of participants receive their intended rehabilitation, this should be interpreted with caution.
ISRCTN29770908.
比较全髋关节置换术(THR)或全膝关节置换术(TKR)后,以行为改变为基础的物理治疗干预增加体力活动与常规康复的效果。
多中心、实用、双臂、开放、随机对照、优效性试验。
英国 9 家医院的国家医疗服务提供者。
224 名年龄≥18 岁的个体,接受初次 THR 或 TKR,被认为是“中度不活跃”或“不活跃”。
参与者接受 6 次、每次 30 分钟、每周一次的小组基础运动课程(常规护理)或相同的 6 次每周小组基础运动课程,每次运动前先进行 30 分钟的认知行为讨论小组,旨在挑战手术后身体不活跃的障碍(实验组)。
最初的 75 名参与者在改变分配比例为 2:1(实验组:常规护理)之前按 1:1 随机分配。分配基于最小化,按合并症、手术类型和医院分层。没有盲法。
主要指标:加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校(UCLA)活动评分在 12 个月时的评分。次要指标:6 个月和 12 个月时的功能、疼痛、自我效能、运动恐惧、心理困扰和生活质量评估。
在评估合格性的 1254 名参与者中,224 名参与者入选(实验组 139 名:常规护理 85 名)。平均年龄为 68.4 岁(标准差:8.7),63%为女性,52%行 TKR。UCLA 评分在组间无差异(平均差异:-0.03(95%CI-0.52 至 0.45,p=0.89))。在 6 个月或 12 个月时,在任何次要结果上均未观察到差异。两组均无重要不良事件。COVID-19 大流行导致预期样本量减少(目标 260)和干预依从性降低。
没有证据表明参加常规护理物理治疗课程加基于小组的行为改变干预与单独参加常规护理物理治疗有区别。由于试验未能达到预期的样本量,也没有达到预期接受康复治疗的参与者比例,因此应谨慎解释结果。
ISRCTN29770908。