• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

荧光原位杂交(FISH)在核型正常的骨髓增生异常综合征患者风险评分评估中的应用。

Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Utility for Risk Score Assessment in Patients With MDS With Normal Metaphase Karyotype.

机构信息

Department of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.

Department of Malignant Hematology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.

出版信息

Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Jan;21(1):e52-e56. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Aug 18.

DOI:10.1016/j.clml.2020.08.012
PMID:33093008
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cytogenetic profile is an essential parameter in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) risk stratification by both International Prognostic Symptom Score (IPSS) and Revised (R)-IPSS. Almost one-half of patients with MDS have normal cytogenetics by metaphase karyotype. Here we report the yield of MDS fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) panel detecting cytogenetic abnormalities in these patients and its impact on risk stratification.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among patients with normal metaphase karyotype, we assessed those patients who had cytogenetic abnormalities detected by an MDS FISH panel, which included probes for del (5), del (7), del (20), trisomy 8, and del (17p). Risk stratification was calculated by both IPSS and R-IPSS.

RESULTS

Of 1600 patients with MDS with normal metaphase karyotype, 53 (3%) patients had cytogenetic abnormality detected by MDS FISH panel. Integrating the MDS FISH panel cytogenetics (IPSS + FISH restaging) resulted in upstaging the score, where 53% of low-risk IPSS were upstaged to intermediate (int)-1, 56% of int-1 were upstaged to int-2, and 78% of int-2 were upstaged to high risk. Based on the R-IPSS, 61% of very low-risk patients, all low-risk patients, 92% of intermediate-risk patients, and 50% of high-risk patients with FISH abnormalities were upstaged, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The yield of MDS FISH panel detecting cytogenetic abnormalities in patients with normal karyotype by G-banding is low and may not warrant ordering the panel in all patients. Among the 3% of patients with normal karyotype who had cytogenetic abnormality detected by FISH, the risk score assignment by IPSS and R-IPSS was upstaged.

摘要

背景

细胞遗传学特征是国际预后积分系统(IPSS)和修订版(R)-IPSS 进行骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)危险分层的重要参数。几乎有一半的 MDS 患者通过中期核型具有正常的细胞遗传学。在此,我们报告了在这些患者中检测细胞遗传学异常的 MDS 荧光原位杂交(FISH)检测板的检出率及其对危险分层的影响。

患者和方法

在具有正常中期核型的患者中,我们评估了那些通过 MDS FISH 检测板检测到细胞遗传学异常的患者,该检测板包括 del(5)、del(7)、del(20)、三体 8 和 del(17p)的探针。通过 IPSS 和 R-IPSS 计算危险分层。

结果

在 1600 例具有正常中期核型的 MDS 患者中,有 53 例(3%)患者通过 MDS FISH 检测板检测到细胞遗传学异常。整合 MDS FISH 检测板细胞遗传学(IPSS+FISH 重新分期)可提高评分,其中 53%的低危 IPSS 被升级为中危-1,56%的中危-1 被升级为中危-2,78%的中危-2 被升级为高危。根据 R-IPSS,分别有 61%的极低危患者、所有低危患者、92%的中危患者和 50%的高危患者伴有 FISH 异常被升级。

结论

用 G 带对核型正常的患者进行 MDS FISH 检测板检测细胞遗传学异常的检出率较低,可能无需对所有患者进行检测板检测。在通过 FISH 检测到核型正常的患者中,有 3%的患者存在细胞遗传学异常,IPSS 和 R-IPSS 的危险评分分配被升级。

相似文献

1
Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Utility for Risk Score Assessment in Patients With MDS With Normal Metaphase Karyotype.荧光原位杂交(FISH)在核型正常的骨髓增生异常综合征患者风险评分评估中的应用。
Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk. 2021 Jan;21(1):e52-e56. doi: 10.1016/j.clml.2020.08.012. Epub 2020 Aug 18.
2
[Cytogenetic abnormalities of 50 MDS patients by FISH detection and conventional karyotype analysis].[50例骨髓增生异常综合征患者细胞遗传学异常的荧光原位杂交检测及传统核型分析]
Zhongguo Shi Yan Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Oct;21(5):1190-4. doi: 10.7534/j.issn.1009-2137.2013.05.021.
3
Clinical importance of interphase cytogenetics detecting occult chromosome lesions in myelodysplastic syndromes with normal karyotype.间期细胞遗传学检测正常核型骨髓增生异常综合征隐匿性染色体病变的临床重要性。
Leukemia. 2001 Dec;15(12):1841-7. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402293.
4
Prognostic classification of MDS is improved by the inclusion of FISH panel testing with conventional cytogenetics.通过将荧光原位杂交(FISH)检测组合与传统细胞遗传学相结合,骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)的预后分类得到了改善。
Cancer Genet. 2017 Oct;216-217:120-127. doi: 10.1016/j.cancergen.2017.05.004. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
5
[Study on prognostic significances of different cytogenetic risk categories in patients with primary myelodysplastic syndromes].[原发性骨髓增生异常综合征患者不同细胞遗传学风险类别的预后意义研究]
Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2011 Dec;32(12):819-24.
6
Multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay identifies additional copy number changes compared with R-band karyotype and provide more accuracy prognostic information in myelodysplastic syndromes.与R带核型分析相比,多重连接依赖探针扩增分析可识别出更多的拷贝数变化,并为骨髓增生异常综合征提供更准确的预后信息。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 3;8(1):1603-1612. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13688.
7
Is fluorescence in-situ hybridization sufficient in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes and insufficient cytogenetic testing?对于骨髓增生异常综合征且细胞遗传学检测不足的患者,荧光原位杂交是否足够?
Leuk Lymphoma. 2019 Mar;60(3):764-771. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2018.1493729. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
8
FISH analysis in addition to G-band karyotyping: utility in evaluation of myelodysplastic syndromes?FISH 分析联合 G 带核型分析:在骨髓增生异常综合征评估中的应用?
Leuk Res. 2010 Apr;34(4):420-5. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2009.09.013. Epub 2009 Oct 1.
9
Cytogenetic response based on revised IPSS cytogenetic risk stratification and minimal residual disease monitoring by FISH in MDS patients treated with low-dose decitabine.低剂量地西他滨治疗骨髓增生异常综合征患者的核型反应基于修订的 IPSS 核型风险分层和 FISH 微小残留病监测。
Leuk Res. 2013 Nov;37(11):1516-21. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2013.09.006. Epub 2013 Sep 18.
10
Comparison of interphase FISH and metaphase cytogenetics to study myelodysplastic syndrome: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) study.采用间期荧光原位杂交(FISH)和中期细胞遗传学研究骨髓增生异常综合征的比较:一项东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)研究
Leuk Res. 2003 Dec;27(12):1085-90. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2126(03)00104-8.

引用本文的文献

1
CYTO-SV-ML: A Machine Learning Tool for Cytogenetic Structural Variant Analysis in Somatic Cell Type Using Genome Sequences.CYTO-SV-ML:一种利用基因组序列对体细胞类型进行细胞遗传学结构变异分析的机器学习工具。
Life (Basel). 2025 Jun 9;15(6):929. doi: 10.3390/life15060929.