Área Académica de Medicina del Instituto de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Hidalgo, Pachuca, Hidalgo, Mexico.
Departamento de Farmacología, Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Ciudad de México, Mexico.
Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2020 Nov;98(11):753-762. doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2020-0104. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
The aim of this study was to examine if the peripheral antinociceptive effects of the opioid agonist/antagonist nalbuphine and buprenorphine involve the sequential participation of nitric oxide (NO) and cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) synthesis followed by K channel opening in the formalin test. Wistar rats (180-220 g) were injected in the dorsal surface of the right hind paw with formalin (1%). Rats received a subcutaneous (s.c.) injection into the dorsal surface of the paw of vehicles or increasing doses of nalbuphine (50-200 μg/paw) or buprenorphine (1-5 μg/paw) 20 min before formalin injection into the paw. Nalbuphine antinociception was reversed by the s.c. injection into the paw of the inhibitor of NO synthesis (N-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME)), by the inhibitor of guanylyl cyclase (1H-[1,2,4]oxadiazolo[4,3-a]quinoxalin-1-one (ODQ)), by the K6.1-2, ATP-sensitive K channel inhibitors (glibenclamide and glipizide), by the K2.1-3, small conductance Ca-activated K channel blocker (apamin), by the K1.1, large conductance Ca-activated K channel blocker (charybdotoxin), and by the K, voltage-dependent K channel inhibitors (4-aminopyridine (4-AP) and tetraethylammonium chloride (TEA)). The antinociceptive effect produced by buprenorphine was blocked by the s.c. injection of 4-AP and TEA but not by L-NAME, ODQ, glibenclamide, glipizide, apamin, or charybdotoxin. The present results provide evidence for differences in peripheral mechanisms of action between these opioid drugs.
本研究旨在考察阿片激动剂/拮抗剂纳布啡和丁丙诺啡的外周抗伤害作用是否涉及一氧化氮(NO)和环鸟苷酸(cGMP)合成的顺序参与,随后是在福尔马林试验中 K 通道的开放。Wistar 大鼠(180-220 g)在右后爪背部表面注射福尔马林(1%)。大鼠在福尔马林注射前 20 分钟在爪背部皮下(s.c.)注射载体或增加剂量的纳布啡(50-200 μg/爪)或丁丙诺啡(1-5 μg/爪)。纳布啡的镇痛作用被爪内注射一氧化氮合酶抑制剂(N-硝基-L-精氨酸甲酯(L-NAME))、鸟苷酸环化酶抑制剂(1H-[1,2,4]恶二唑[4,3-a]喹喔啉-1-酮(ODQ))、K+6.1-2、ATP 敏感性 K+通道抑制剂(格列本脲和格列吡嗪)、K2.1-3、小电导钙激活 K+通道阻滞剂(apamin)、K1.1、大电导钙激活 K+通道阻滞剂(charybdotoxin)和 K、电压依赖性 K+通道抑制剂(4-氨基吡啶(4-AP)和四乙基氯化铵(TEA))逆转。丁丙诺啡产生的镇痛作用被爪内注射 4-AP 和 TEA 阻断,但不受 L-NAME、ODQ、格列本脲、格列吡嗪、apamin 或 charybdotoxin 阻断。这些结果为这些阿片类药物的外周作用机制的差异提供了证据。