• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用电子癫痫日记中的自由文本记录识别癫痫发作簇。

Identification of seizure clusters using free text notes in an electronic seizure diary.

机构信息

Stanford Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences, USA.

Yale University School of Medicine, and Consultant Houston, TX, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Dec;113:107498. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107498. Epub 2020 Oct 20.

DOI:10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107498
PMID:33096508
Abstract

SIGNIFICANCE

Online seizure diaries offer a wealth of information regarding real world experience of patients living with epilepsy. Free text notes (FTN) written by patients reflect concerns and priorities of patients and provide supplemental information to structured diary data.

OBJECTIVE

This project evaluated feasibility using an automated lexical analysis to identify FTN relevant to seizure clusters (SCs).

METHODS

Data were extracted from EpiDiary™, a free electronic epilepsy diary with 42,799 unique users, generating 1,096,168 entries and 247,232 FTN. Both structured data as well as FTN were analyzed for presence of SC. A pilot study was conducted to validate an automated lexical analysis algorithm to identify SC in FTN in a sample of 98 diaries. The lexical analysis was then applied to the entire dataset. Outcomes included cluster prevalence and frequency, as well as the types of triggers commonly reported.

RESULTS

At least one FTN was found among 13,987 (32.68%) individual diaries. An automated lexical analysis algorithm identified 5797 of FTN as SC. There were 2423 unique patients with SC that were not identified by structured data alone and were identified using lexical analysis of FTN only. Seizure clusters were identified in n = 10,331 (24.1%) of diary users through both structured data and FTN. The median number of SCs days per year was 13.7, (interquartile rank (IQR): 3.2-54.7). The median number of seizures in a cluster day was 3 (IQR 2-4). The most common missed medication linked to patients with SC was levetiracetam (n = 576, 29%) followed by lamotrigine (n = 495, 24%), topiramate (n = 208, 10.5%), carbamazepine (n = 190, 9.6%), and lacosamide (n = 170, 8.6%). These percentages generally reflected prevalence of medication use in this population. The use of rescue medications was documented in 3306 of structured entries and 4305 in FTN.

CONCLUSION

This exploratory study demonstrates a novel approach applying lexical analysis to previously untapped FTN in a large electronic seizure diary database. Free text notes captured information about SC not available from the structured diary data. Diary FTN contain information of high importance to people with epilepsy, written in their own words.

摘要

意义

在线癫痫日记为了解癫痫患者的真实世界体验提供了丰富的信息。患者撰写的自由文本注释 (FTN) 反映了患者的关注点和优先事项,并为结构化日记数据提供了补充信息。

目的

本项目使用自动词汇分析评估了识别与癫痫发作群 (SCs) 相关的 FTN 的可行性。

方法

从 EpiDiary™ 中提取数据,这是一个免费的电子癫痫日记,拥有 42799 名独特用户,生成了 1096168 条条目和 247232 条 FTN。对结构化数据和 FTN 都进行了分析,以确定是否存在 SC。进行了一项试点研究,以验证一种自动词汇分析算法,以在 98 份日记的样本中识别 FTN 中的 SC。然后将词汇分析应用于整个数据集。结果包括簇的流行率和频率,以及常见的触发因素类型。

结果

在 13987 名(32.68%)个体日记中至少发现了一条 FTN。自动词汇分析算法确定了 5797 条 FTN 是 SC。有 2423 名独特的患者,仅通过结构化数据无法识别,仅通过 FTN 的词汇分析才能识别。通过结构化数据和 FTN,在 n=10331 名(24.1%)日记用户中确定了癫痫发作群。每年 SC 天数的中位数为 13.7 天(四分位间距 (IQR):3.2-54.7)。簇日发作的中位数为 3 次(IQR 2-4)。与有 SC 的患者相关的最常见漏服药物是左乙拉西坦(n=576,29%),其次是拉莫三嗪(n=495,24%)、托吡酯(n=208,10.5%)、卡马西平(n=190,9.6%)和拉科酰胺(n=170,8.6%)。这些百分比通常反映了该人群中药物使用的流行率。在结构化条目 3306 条和 FTN 4305 条中记录了抢救药物的使用情况。

结论

本探索性研究展示了一种应用词汇分析的新方法,该方法应用于大型电子癫痫日记数据库中以前未开发的 FTN。自由文本注释记录了结构化日记数据中未包含的有关 SC 的信息。日记的 FTN 包含了患者用自己的语言描述的、对癫痫患者非常重要的信息。

相似文献

1
Identification of seizure clusters using free text notes in an electronic seizure diary.使用电子癫痫日记中的自由文本记录识别癫痫发作簇。
Epilepsy Behav. 2020 Dec;113:107498. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2020.107498. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
2
The challenges of assessing effectiveness of lacosamide using electronic medical record databases.利用电子病历数据库评估拉科酰胺有效性面临的挑战。
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Aug;85:195-199. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.06.031. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
3
Individualizing the definition of seizure clusters based on temporal clustering analysis.基于时间聚类分析个体化癫痫发作簇的定义。
Epilepsy Res. 2020 Jul;163:106330. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2020.106330. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
4
Prevalence and predictors of seizure clusters: A prospective observational study of adult patients with epilepsy.癫痫患者发作簇的患病率和预测因素:一项前瞻性观察性研究成人患者。
Epilepsy Behav. 2018 Nov;88:349-356. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2018.09.035. Epub 2018 Oct 19.
5
Use of an online epilepsy diary to characterize repetitive seizures.使用在线癫痫日记来描述重复性癫痫发作。
Epilepsy Behav. 2015 Jun;47:66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2015.04.022. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
6
Electronic seizure diaries for clinical care and research.电子癫痫日记用于临床护理和研究。
Epileptic Disord. 2022 Oct 1;24(5):803-811. doi: 10.1684/epd.2022.1451.
7
Use of an electronic seizure diary in a randomized, controlled trial of natalizumab in adult participants with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.电子癫痫日记在随机对照试验中用于评估纳武单抗治疗成人耐药性局灶性癫痫的疗效。
Epilepsy Behav. 2021 May;118:107925. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107925. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
8
Long-term seizure diary tracking habits in clinical studies: Evidence from the Human Epilepsy Project.长期癫痫日记追踪习惯在临床研究中的应用:来自人类癫痫项目的证据。
Epilepsy Res. 2024 Jul;203:107379. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2024.107379. Epub 2024 May 8.
9
Seizure diaries for clinical research and practice: limitations and future prospects.临床研究和实践中的发作日记:局限性和未来前景。
Epilepsy Behav. 2012 Jul;24(3):304-10. doi: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2012.04.128. Epub 2012 May 30.
10
Prevalence and Predictors of Seizure Clusters in Pediatric Patients With Epilepsy: The Harvard-Yale Pediatric Seizure Cluster Study.癫痫儿科患者癫痫发作簇的患病率和预测因素:哈佛-耶鲁儿科癫痫发作簇研究。
Pediatr Neurol. 2022 Dec;137:22-29. doi: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2022.08.014. Epub 2022 Sep 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Capturing patient experiences of care with digital technology to improve service delivery and quality of care: A scoping review.利用数字技术获取患者的就医体验以改善服务提供和医疗质量:一项范围综述。
Digit Health. 2024 Oct 22;10:20552076241282900. doi: 10.1177/20552076241282900. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.