Suppr超能文献

社会剥夺与先天性上肢差异——使用 PROMIS 的评估。

Social Deprivation and Congenital Upper Extremity Differences-An Assessment Using PROMIS.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, MO.

出版信息

J Hand Surg Am. 2021 Feb;46(2):114-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2020.08.017. Epub 2020 Oct 21.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Social deprivation, a measure of socioeconomic status, has been shown to negatively affect perceptions of orthopedic conditions and outcomes of treatment. The objective of this study was to assess whether social deprivation correlates with subjective assessment of function in pediatric patients with congenital hand differences.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the Congenital Upper Limb Differences (CoULD) registry were assessed using the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). The PROMIS scores for Pain Interference, Peer Relations, Anxiety, Depression, and Upper Extremity (UE) function were obtained for all patients 5 years and older at initial presentation. Social deprivation was determined by the Area Deprivation Index (ADI); the index ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores being the most deprived. The PROMIS scores were correlated with the ADI for all patients.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-five pediatric patients with congenital UE differences were evaluated. Average age was 11 years, 56% were female, and 55% had bilateral involvement. Overall, PROMIS scores were within 1 SD of normal for Peer Relations, Pain, Depression, and Anxiety. However, child-reported scores for UE function (39) were more than 1 SD below the national average (50). The mean ADI for the cohort was lower than the national average, indicative of less deprivation, with 14% of patients in the most deprived national quartile. Children in the highest ADI quartile reported PROMIS scores that reflected higher Pain Interference (41 vs 45), lower Peer Relations (55 vs 50), higher Anxiety (44 vs 49), and higher Depression (43 vs 47) than children in the lowest ADI quartile.

CONCLUSIONS

The PROMIS scores were normal for psychosocial measures in children with congenital hand differences when evaluated as an entire cohort. However, child self-reported PROMIS scores for Pain Interference, Peer Relations, Anxiety, and Depression were worse in more socially deprived areas, suggesting more psychosocial challenges in these children.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Pediatric patients with congenital upper extremity differences in areas of higher social deprivation report lower psychosocial well-being. The care of these individuals must be considered within the context of their environment because they may be more at risk for negative outcomes secondary to environmental and societal stressors.

摘要

目的

社会剥夺是一种衡量社会经济地位的指标,已被证明会对骨科疾病的认知和治疗结果产生负面影响。本研究的目的是评估社会剥夺是否与先天性手部差异患儿的主观功能评估相关。

方法

登记于先天性上肢差异(CoULD)注册中心的患者使用患者报告的结果测量信息系统(PROMIS)进行评估。所有 5 岁及以上的患者在初次就诊时均获得疼痛干扰、同伴关系、焦虑、抑郁和上肢(UE)功能的 PROMIS 评分。社会剥夺程度通过区域剥夺指数(ADI)确定;指数范围从 0 到 100,分数越高表示剥夺程度越高。对所有患者的 PROMIS 评分与 ADI 进行相关性分析。

结果

对 375 例先天性 UE 差异的儿科患者进行了评估。平均年龄为 11 岁,56%为女性,55%为双侧受累。总体而言,同伴关系、疼痛、抑郁和焦虑的 PROMIS 评分均在 1 个标准差范围内正常。然而,儿童报告的 UE 功能评分(39)比全国平均水平低 1 个标准差以上(50)。队列的平均 ADI 低于全国平均水平,表明剥夺程度较低,只有 14%的患者处于全国最贫困的四分位数。处于 ADI 最高四分位数的儿童报告的 PROMIS 评分表明疼痛干扰更高(41 对 45),同伴关系更低(55 对 50),焦虑更高(44 对 49),抑郁更高(43 对 47),比处于 ADI 最低四分位数的儿童。

结论

当作为一个整体队列进行评估时,先天性手部差异儿童的 PROMIS 评分在社会心理测量方面正常。然而,在社会剥夺程度较高的地区,儿童自我报告的 PROMIS 疼痛干扰、同伴关系、焦虑和抑郁评分更差,表明这些儿童面临更大的社会心理挑战。

临床意义

社会剥夺程度较高地区的先天性上肢差异患儿报告的社会心理福祉较低。这些个体的护理必须在其环境背景下考虑,因为他们可能由于环境和社会压力源而面临更多的负面结果风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验