General and Experimental Psychology, Psychology Department, LMU Munich, 80802, Munich, Germany.
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 23;10(1):18174. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-75191-6.
Although time perception is based on the internal representation of time, whether the subjective timeline is scaled linearly or logarithmically remains an open issue. Evidence from previous research is mixed: while the classical internal-clock model assumes a linear scale with scalar variability, there is evidence that logarithmic timing provides a better fit to behavioral data. A major challenge for investigating the nature of the internal scale is that the retrieval process required for time judgments may involve a remapping of the subjective time back to the objective scale, complicating any direct interpretation of behavioral findings. Here, we used a novel approach, requiring rapid intuitive 'ensemble' averaging of a whole set of time intervals, to probe the subjective timeline. Specifically, observers' task was to average a series of successively presented, auditory or visual, intervals in the time range 300-1300 ms. Importantly, the intervals were taken from three sets of durations, which were distributed such that the arithmetic mean (from the linear scale) and the geometric mean (from the logarithmic scale) were clearly distinguishable. Consistently across the three sets and the two presentation modalities, our results revealed subjective averaging to be close to the geometric mean, indicative of a logarithmic timeline underlying time perception.
尽管时间感知是基于时间的内部表示,但主观时间线是按线性还是对数刻度划分仍存在悬而未决的问题。来自先前研究的证据喜忧参半:虽然经典的内部时钟模型假设具有标量可变性的线性标度,但有证据表明对数计时更能拟合行为数据。研究内部标度性质的主要挑战是,时间判断所需的检索过程可能涉及将主观时间重新映射到客观标度,从而使任何对行为发现的直接解释变得复杂。在这里,我们使用了一种新颖的方法,要求对一整套时间间隔进行快速直观的“整体”平均,以探测主观时间线。具体来说,观察者的任务是平均一系列连续呈现的听觉或视觉间隔,时间范围为 300-1300 毫秒。重要的是,这些间隔取自三个时间段集,这些时间段集的分布使得算术平均值(来自线性标度)和几何平均值(来自对数标度)明显可区分。在三个时间段集和两种呈现方式中,我们的结果一致表明主观平均接近几何平均值,这表明时间感知的基础是对数时间线。