Department of Health, Exercise, and Sports Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, USA.
Eur J Appl Physiol. 2021 Feb;121(2):445-452. doi: 10.1007/s00421-020-04522-2. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
To test the efficacy of a plateau in heart rate (HR) as an effective indicator for confirming [Formula: see text]max attainment in a middle-aged to older sample.
Nine men and eleven women (age 60 ± 8.5 years, [Formula: see text]max 35.9 ± 9.4 ml/kg/min, N = 20) completed a single [Formula: see text]max test on both the treadmill and cycle ergometer.[Formula: see text]max was confirmed using a plateau in [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) of ≤ 150 ml/min, a verification bout, and HR (≤ 4 bpm).
[Formula: see text] occurred in 100% and 95% of participants on the treadmill and cycle ergometer, respectively. Verification criteria ([Formula: see text]max during verification ≤ 2% of [Formula: see text]max during incremental test) were met by 80% of participants on both modalities. HR was achieved by 90% and 70% of participants on the treadmill and cycle ergometer, respectively.
These results suggest that a verification bout is reliable for confirming [Formula: see text]max in older adults on both modalities. In our sample of middle-aged and older adults, [Formula: see text] was the most robust method to assess [Formula: see text]max when indirect calorimetry is available. Although more research is warranted, when indirect calorimetry is not available, a HR of ≤ 4 bpm may be a useful alternative to get an accurate representation of maximal effort in middle-aged and older adults.
测试心率(HR)平台是否可作为有效指标,用于确认中年及以上人群达到最大摄氧量([Formula: see text]max)。
9 名男性和 11 名女性(年龄 60±8.5 岁,最大摄氧量 35.9±9.4 ml/kg/min,N=20)分别在跑步机和功率自行车上完成了一次最大摄氧量测试。通过[Formula: see text]([Formula: see text])≤150 ml/min 的平台、验证回合和 HR(≤4 bpm)来确认最大摄氧量。
分别有 100%和 95%的参与者在跑步机和功率自行车上达到[Formula: see text]。两种模式下 80%的参与者均满足验证标准(验证时的最大摄氧量[Formula: see text]max≤递增测试时最大摄氧量[Formula: see text]max的 2%)。HR 在跑步机和功率自行车上分别达到 90%和 70%的参与者。
这些结果表明,验证回合可用于可靠地确认两种模式下的老年人[Formula: see text]max。在我们的中年和老年人样本中,当可使用间接测热法时,[Formula: see text]是评估[Formula: see text]max 的最可靠方法。虽然需要更多的研究,但当无法使用间接测热法时,HR≤4 bpm 可能是一种有用的替代方法,可以准确反映中年和老年人的最大努力程度。