Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Catholic University, St. Vincent's Hospital College of Medicine, Suwon-si, South Korea.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Inha University Hospital College of Medicine, Incheon, South Korea.
Orthop Surg. 2020 Dec;12(6):2004-2012. doi: 10.1111/os.12811. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the dislocation rate and the risk factors leading to instability after primary and revision total hip replacement arthroplasty (THRA) with constrained acetabular liners (CAL), as well as treatment strategies for prevention of dislocation. From 1999 to 2017, drawing on two institutions' THRA registries, we retrospectively identified 46 THRA cases using a CAL that had been followed up for a minimum of 4 years. The patients comprised 39 women and 7 men, with an average age of 69.1 years (age range, 41-98). Of the 46 patients, CAL were used in 12 patients for prevention of dislocation in primary THRA and in 34 patients for treatment of recurrent dislocation after primary THRA. Clinical and radiological evaluation were performed. We evaluated the failure rate of CAL as well as the risk factors. The 12 patients who used CAL for prevention of dislocation in primary THRA had no dislocation. However, 12 (35%) of the 34 hips had a dislocation after use of CAL in revision THRA. Patients with an abductor muscle weakness grade of ≤3 had a higher rate of dislocation than those with a grade of ≥4 (grade 1; likelihood ratio = ∞, grade 2; likelihood ratio = 1.83, grade 3; likelihood ratio = 1.05, grade 4; likelihood ratio = 0.46, and grade 5; likelihood ratio = 0). The group of primary THRA with CAL had no dislocations, and this is a proper way for prevention of dislocation in high-risk patients. The group of revision THRA with CAL had a high dislocation rate (35%). Abductor muscle weakness below grade 3 was a risk factor for failure of CAL for hip dislocation. We recommend treating patients with recurrent dislocations with the presence of abductor muscle weakness below grade 3 with not only THRA using CAL but also applying additional abductor muscle reconstruction to reduce the risk of dislocation.
本研究旨在评估初次和翻修全髋关节置换术(THRA)中使用约束性髋臼衬垫(CAL)后的脱位率和导致不稳定的危险因素,以及预防脱位的治疗策略。1999 年至 2017 年,我们通过两家机构的 THRA 登记处,回顾性地确定了 46 例使用 CAL 的 THRA 病例,这些病例的随访时间至少为 4 年。患者包括 39 名女性和 7 名男性,平均年龄为 69.1 岁(年龄范围为 41-98 岁)。在这 46 例患者中,CAL 在 12 例初次 THRA 中用于预防脱位,在 34 例初次 THRA 后复发性脱位中用于治疗。对所有患者进行临床和影像学评估。我们评估了 CAL 的失败率和危险因素。12 例初次 THRA 中使用 CAL 预防脱位的患者均未发生脱位。然而,在 34 例翻修 THRA 中使用 CAL 的髋关节中有 12 例(35%)发生了脱位。存在外展肌无力等级≤3 的患者的脱位率高于等级≥4 的患者(等级 1;似然比=∞,等级 2;似然比=1.83,等级 3;似然比=1.05,等级 4;似然比=0.46,等级 5;似然比=0)。CAL 用于初次 THRA 的患者无脱位,这是预防高危患者脱位的一种恰当方法。CAL 用于翻修 THRA 的患者脱位率较高(35%)。外展肌无力等级低于 3 级是 CAL 治疗髋关节脱位失败的危险因素。我们建议对存在外展肌无力等级低于 3 级的复发性脱位患者,不仅采用使用 CAL 的 THRA,还应进行额外的外展肌重建,以降低脱位风险。