Llompart Miquel, Dąbrowska Ewa
Chair of Language and Cognition, Department of English and American Studies, Friedrich Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Department of English Language and Linguistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Front Psychol. 2020 Sep 25;11:569586. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.569586. eCollection 2020.
The present paper examines the relationship between explicit and implicit memory and ultimate attainment in the native language. Two groups of native speakers of English with different levels of academic attainment (i.e., high vs. low) took part in three language tasks which assessed grammar, vocabulary and collocational knowledge, as well as phonological short-term memory (assessed using a forward digit-span task), explicit associative memory (assessed using a paired-associates task) and implicit memory (assessed using a deterministic serial reaction time task). Results revealed strong relationships between phonological short-term memory and explicit associative memory on the one hand and the three language tasks on the other hand, and no relation between linguistic performance and implicit memory. Taken together, these results cast doubts on the common assumption that L1 grammar learning depends almost entirely on implicit memory and align with the claims of usage-based models of language acquisition that grammatical and lexical knowledge depend on the same cognitive mechanisms.
本文探讨了显性记忆和隐性记忆与母语最终习得水平之间的关系。两组学术成就水平不同(即高与低)的英语母语者参与了三项语言任务,这些任务评估了语法、词汇和搭配知识,以及语音短期记忆(使用顺背数字广度任务进行评估)、显性联想记忆(使用配对联想任务进行评估)和隐性记忆(使用确定性序列反应时任务进行评估)。结果显示,一方面,语音短期记忆和显性联想记忆与三项语言任务之间存在密切关系;另一方面,语言表现与隐性记忆之间没有关系。综合来看,这些结果对母语语法学习几乎完全依赖隐性记忆这一普遍假设提出了质疑,并与基于用法的语言习得模型的观点一致,即语法和词汇知识依赖于相同的认知机制。