Wu Trudy C, McCloskey Susan A, Wallner Paul E, Steinberg Michael L, Raldow Ann C
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, California.
21st Century Oncology, Inc, Ft. Myers, Florida.
Adv Radiat Oncol. 2021 Jan-Feb;6(1):100597. doi: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.10.010. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
The purpose of our study was to better understand and identify concerns that may be responsible for the declining radiation oncology (RO) residency applicant pool.
All RO residency programs affiliated with a US medical school were asked to participate in the study survey. An optional and anonymous survey consisting of 12 questions was emailed to all graduating medical students in 2020 at the 12 allopathic medical schools that agreed to survey administration. Survey responses were collected from March to May 2020.
The study consisted of 265 survey responses out of 1766 distributed to eligible medical students, resulting in a response rate of 15.0%. The majority of students reported no exposure to RO (60.8%) and never considered it as a career option (63.8%). Neutral perceptions of the field were more common (54.3%) than positive (39.6%) and negative (6.0%). The top factors attracting medical students to RO were perceptions of high salary, favorable lifestyle and workload, and technological focus. The top negative factors were the field's interplay with physics, competitive United States Medical Licensing Examination board scores for matched applicants, and the focus placed on research during medical school. In the subgroup of students who were interested in RO but ultimately applied to another specialty, the job market was the most salient concern.
Finding a place for RO in medical school curricula remains a challenge, with most surveyed students reporting no exposure during their education. Concern over the job market was the primary deterrent for medical students interested in pursuing RO. For disinterested students who had not considered RO as a career option, the required physics knowledge was the main deterrent.
我们研究的目的是更好地理解和识别可能导致放射肿瘤学(RO)住院医师申请人数下降的相关问题。
邀请所有与美国医学院相关的RO住院医师培训项目参与研究调查。向2020年毕业的、来自12所同意进行调查管理的全科医学院校的所有医学生发送了一份包含12个问题的可选匿名调查问卷。调查回复于2020年3月至5月收集。
在分发给符合条件的医学生的1766份调查问卷中,共收到265份回复,回复率为15.0%。大多数学生表示未接触过RO(60.8%),且从未将其视为职业选择(63.8%)。对该领域持中立看法的情况更为常见(54.3%),而持积极看法的占39.6%,持消极看法的占6.0%。吸引医学生选择RO的首要因素是对高薪、良好生活方式和工作量以及技术重点的认知。首要负面因素是该领域与物理学的相互作用、美国医师执照考试委员会对匹配申请人的高竞争分数以及医学院期间对研究的重视。在对RO感兴趣但最终申请了其他专业的学生亚组中,就业市场是最突出的担忧。
在医学院课程中为RO找到一席之地仍然是一项挑战,大多数接受调查的学生表示在其教育过程中未接触过该领域。对就业市场的担忧是有意从事RO的医学生的主要阻碍。对于未将RO视为职业选择的不感兴趣的学生来说,所需的物理知识是主要阻碍。