Suppr超能文献

正性肌力药物和血管加压药物在治疗心源性休克中的应用。

Inotropic Agents and Vasopressors in the Treatment of Cardiogenic Shock.

机构信息

John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Surrey, UK.

Royal Berkshire Hospital, Royal Berkshire NHS Foundation Trust, Berkshire, UK.

出版信息

Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2020 Dec;17(6):438-448. doi: 10.1007/s11897-020-00493-9. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Worldwide, cardiogenic shock (CS) is the leading cause of death in patients admitted with an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). CS is characterised by reduced cardiac output secondary to systolic dysfunction which can lead to multi-organ failure. The mainstay of medical treatment in CS are inotropes and vasopressors to improve cardiac output. However, current clinical guidelines do not direct clinicians as to which agents to use and in what combinations. This article aims to review the current evidence on the management of CS with a major focus on the use of inotropes and vasopressors.

METHOD

A literature review was conducted analysing published literature from the following databases: PubMed, MedLine, Cochrane Library and Embase, as well as a manual search of articles that were deemed relevant. Relevant articles were identified by using keywords such as "cardiogenic shock".

RESULTS

Literature was assessed to review the use of inotropes and vasopressors in CS. Dopamine and adrenaline were associated with increased mortality and arrhythmias. Dobutamine was associated with an improvement in cardiac output, at the determinant of causing arrhythmias. Conversely, noradrenaline was associated with a lower likelihood of arrhythmias and most importantly decreased mortality in CS. Compared to other inotropes, levosimendan appears to have a better safety profile and is associated with decreased mortality in CS, particularly when combined with a vasopressor. Our literature review suggests that treatment combination of the inotrope levosimendan with the vasopressor noradrenaline may be the most effective management option in CS.

摘要

背景

在全球范围内,心源性休克(CS)是急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者入院死亡的主要原因。CS 的特征是收缩功能障碍导致心输出量减少,从而导致多器官衰竭。CS 治疗的主要方法是使用正性肌力药和血管加压素来提高心输出量。然而,目前的临床指南并没有指导临床医生使用哪些药物以及以何种组合使用。本文旨在回顾 CS 管理的现有证据,重点关注正性肌力药和血管加压素的使用。

方法

对以下数据库中的已发表文献进行了文献回顾:PubMed、MedLine、Cochrane 图书馆和 Embase,以及对认为相关的文章进行了手动搜索。使用“心源性休克”等关键词识别相关文章。

结果

文献评估了 CS 中使用正性肌力药和血管加压素的情况。多巴胺和肾上腺素与死亡率增加和心律失常有关。多巴酚丁胺与心输出量的改善有关,但会导致心律失常。相反,去甲肾上腺素与心律失常的可能性较低以及 CS 中死亡率的降低有关。与其他正性肌力药相比,左西孟旦似乎具有更好的安全性,并且与 CS 中的死亡率降低有关,尤其是与血管加压素联合使用时。我们的文献回顾表明,正性肌力药左西孟旦与血管加压素去甲肾上腺素的联合治疗可能是 CS 最有效的治疗选择。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验