Suppr超能文献

甲状腺细胞病理学报告的贝塞斯达系统中细胞诊断陷阱对甲状腺结节患者手术决策的影响:这些陷阱能否避免?

Impact of cytological pitfalls in the Bethesda System of Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, on surgical decision-making of patients with thyroid nodules: Can these pitfalls be avoided?

作者信息

Rana Chanchal, Singh Kul Ranjan, Ramakant Pooja, Babu Suresh, Mishra Anand

机构信息

Department of Pathology, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.

Department of endocrine surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India.

出版信息

Cytopathology. 2021 Mar;32(2):192-204. doi: 10.1111/cyt.12931. Epub 2020 Dec 5.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The purpose was to assess diagnostic accuracy of the Bethesda System of Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, reasons for disagreement and cytological pitfalls with impact on surgical decisions in patients with thyroid nodules.

METHODS

Cases of thyroid cytology with histological follow up were included followed by cytological-histological correlation and were reviewed to look for reasons for discrepancies. The impact of disagreements and partial agreements on surgical decision was evaluated. Overall and complete diagnostic accuracy were calculated along with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for malignant and neoplastic lesions.

RESULTS

Of 446 cases included in the study, there was complete agreement in 358 cases, partial agreement in 22 cases and disagreement in 66 patients. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 98.5% with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of 80%, 99.6%, 100%, 72.7% and 94.3% respectively for malignant lesions. Overall diagnostic accuracy was highest for the malignant category. Follicular patterned lesions, Hürthle cell-rich smears and overlapping cytological features between benign and malignant follicular neoplasm were the main reason of discrepancy. The discrepancy in cytological diagnosis altered the decision of type of surgery performed in 13.6% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Fine needle aspiration cytology remains a powerful screening tool to aid decision-making in the majority of the patients. Histological-cytological discrepancy can adversely impact the management of patients. Factors causing an adverse impact on surgical management were rare and potential avoidable reasons for them were identified. Cytological pitfalls may be avoided through screening for minor components, clinico-radiological correlation and experience.

摘要

引言

目的是评估甲状腺细胞病理学报告的贝塞斯达系统的诊断准确性、分歧原因以及对甲状腺结节患者手术决策有影响的细胞病理学陷阱。

方法

纳入有组织学随访的甲状腺细胞学病例,随后进行细胞病理学与组织学的相关性分析,并回顾以寻找差异原因。评估分歧和部分一致对手术决策的影响。计算总体和完全诊断准确性以及恶性和肿瘤性病变的敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值。

结果

在纳入研究的446例病例中,358例完全一致,22例部分一致,66例存在分歧。总体诊断准确性为98.5%,恶性病变的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为80%、99.6%、100%、72.7%和94.3%。恶性类别总体诊断准确性最高。滤泡样病变、富含许特莱细胞的涂片以及良性和恶性滤泡性肿瘤之间细胞特征重叠是差异的主要原因。细胞诊断差异改变了13.6%患者的手术类型决策。

结论

细针穿刺细胞学仍然是帮助大多数患者进行决策的有力筛查工具。组织学与细胞病理学差异可能对患者管理产生不利影响。确定了对手术管理产生不利影响的因素很少且可能是可避免的原因。通过筛查微小成分、临床影像学相关性和经验可避免细胞病理学陷阱。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验