Nicolaidis Christina, Zhen Kelly Y, Lee Junghee, Raymaker Dora M, Kapp Steven K, Croen Lisa A, Urbanowicz Anna, Maslak Joelle, Scharer Mirah
Portland State University (PSU), USA.
Oregon Health & Science University (OHSU), USA.
Autism. 2021 Apr;25(3):786-799. doi: 10.1177/1362361320967178. Epub 2020 Oct 25.
Interventions to improve healthcare for autistic adults are greatly needed. To evaluate such interventions, researchers often use surveys to collect data from autistic adults (or sometimes, their supporters), but few survey measures have been tested for use with autistic adults. Our objective was to create and test a set of patient- or proxy-reported survey measures for use in studies that evaluate healthcare interventions. We used a community-based participatory research (CBPR) approach, in partnership with autistic adults, healthcare providers, and supporters. We worked together to create or adapt survey measures. Three survey measures focus on things that interventions may try to change directly: (1) how prepared patients are for visits; (2) how confident they feel in managing their health and healthcare; and (3) how well the healthcare system is making the accommodations patients feel they need. The other measures focus on the outcomes that interventions may hope to achieve: (4) improved patient-provider communication; (5) reduced barriers to care; and (6) reduced unmet healthcare needs. We then tested these measures in a survey of 244 autistic adults recruited from 12 primary care clinics in Oregon and California, USA (with 194 participating directly and 50 participating via a proxy reporter). Community partners made sure items were easy to understand and captured what was important about the underlying idea. We found the survey measures worked well in this sample. These measures may help researchers evaluate new healthcare interventions. Future research needs to assess whether interventions improve healthcare outcomes in autistic adults.
迫切需要采取干预措施来改善成年自闭症患者的医疗保健状况。为了评估此类干预措施,研究人员通常使用调查问卷从成年自闭症患者(或有时是他们的支持者)那里收集数据,但很少有调查方法经过测试可用于成年自闭症患者。我们的目标是创建并测试一套患者或代理人报告的调查方法,用于评估医疗保健干预措施的研究。我们采用了基于社区的参与性研究(CBPR)方法,与成年自闭症患者、医疗服务提供者和支持者合作。我们共同努力创建或调整调查方法。三项调查方法关注干预措施可能试图直接改变的方面:(1)患者对就诊的准备程度;(2)他们在管理自身健康和医疗保健方面的信心;(3)医疗保健系统在提供患者认为所需的便利方面的表现。其他方法则关注干预措施可能希望实现的结果:(4)改善患者与提供者之间的沟通;(5)减少就医障碍;(6)减少未满足的医疗需求。然后,我们在美国俄勒冈州和加利福尼亚州的12家初级保健诊所招募的244名成年自闭症患者的调查中测试了这些方法(其中194人直接参与,50人通过代理人参与)。社区合作伙伴确保调查项目易于理解,并抓住了基本理念的重要方面。我们发现这些调查方法在这个样本中效果良好。这些方法可能有助于研究人员评估新的医疗保健干预措施。未来的研究需要评估干预措施是否能改善成年自闭症患者的医疗保健结果。