Suppr超能文献

血管炎性周围神经病:系统性和非系统性病因的差异:病例系列和活检报告。

Vasculitic Peripheral Neuropathy, Differences Between Systemic and Non-Systemic Etiologies: A Case Series and Biopsy Report.

机构信息

Neurology department, FLENI, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Neuropathology department, FLENI, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

出版信息

J Neuromuscul Dis. 2021;8(1):155-161. doi: 10.3233/JND-200576.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vasculitic peripheral neuropathy (VPN) is caused by vessel inflammation leading to peripheral nerve injury of acute-to-subacute onset. When VPN occurs in the context of systemic disease it is classified as Systemic Vasculitic Neuropathy (SVN) and as Non-Systemic Vasculitic Neuropathy (NSVN) when restricted to the nerves.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the clinical characteristics, biopsy findings and disease outcome in patients with VPN.

METHODS

Clinical records of adult patients with VPN diagnosed at our institution between June-2002 and June-2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic characteristics, clinical manifestations, nerve conduction studies, nerve biopsies, treatment and clinical evolution were analyzed in all patients with at least 6 months follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients with VPN were included (SVN, n = 10; NSVN, n = 15). No significant differences in demographic or clinical features were found between groups. The median delay between symptom onset and nerve biopsy was significantly longer in NSVN patients (10 vs 5.5 months, p = 0.009). Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) values over 20 mm/h were significantly more common in SVN patients (100% vs. 60%, p = 0.024). Nerve biopsies showed active lesions more frequently in treatment-naive patients compared to those who had received at least 2 weeks of corticosteroids (92% vs 38%; p = 0.03), with a higher proportion of definite VPN cases (92 vs 46%; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Although the clinical manifestations are similar, ESR is an important tool to help distinguish between both conditions. Early nerve biopsy in untreated patients increases diagnostic accuracy, avoiding misdiagnosis.

摘要

背景

脉管炎性周围神经病(VPN)是由血管炎症导致的急性至亚急性起病的周围神经损伤。当 VPN 发生在系统性疾病中时,它被归类为系统性脉管炎性神经病(SVN),而当仅限于神经时,则归类为非系统性脉管炎性神经病(NSVN)。

目的

本研究旨在比较 VPN 患者的临床特征、活检结果和疾病结局。

方法

回顾性分析 2002 年 6 月至 2019 年 6 月期间在我院诊断为 VPN 的成年患者的临床记录。所有至少随访 6 个月的患者均分析其人口统计学特征、临床表现、神经传导研究、神经活检、治疗和临床转归。

结果

共纳入 25 例 VPN 患者(SVN,n = 10;NSVN,n = 15)。两组患者的人口统计学或临床特征无显著差异。NSVN 患者的症状出现至神经活检的中位时间明显长于 SVN 患者(10 个月 vs 5.5 个月,p = 0.009)。ESR 值超过 20mm/h 的患者在 SVN 患者中更为常见(100% vs. 60%,p = 0.024)。与至少接受 2 周皮质类固醇治疗的患者相比,未经治疗的患者的神经活检中更常出现活动性病变(92% vs. 38%;p = 0.03),且明确 VPN 病例的比例更高(92% vs. 46%;p = 0.04)。

结论

尽管临床表现相似,但 ESR 是帮助区分两种疾病的重要工具。未治疗患者的早期神经活检可提高诊断准确性,避免误诊。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验