Endlich Yasmin, Beckmann Linda A, Choi Siu-Wai, Culwick Martin D
Department of Anaesthesia, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Department of Anaesthesia, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2020 Sep;48(5):389-398. doi: 10.1177/0310057X20945325. Epub 2020 Oct 8.
This audit of airway incidents was conducted over six months in 12 tertiary level hospitals across Australia and New Zealand. During that time, 131,233 patients had airway management and 111 reports were submitted (incidence 0.08%). The airway incidents included a combination of difficult airway management (83), oxygen desaturation (58), aspiration (19), regurgitation (14), laryngospasm (16), airway bleeding (10), bronchospasm (5) and dental injury (4), which gave a total of 209 events in 111 reports. Most incidents occurred during general anaesthesia (GA; 83.8%) and normal working hours (81.1%). Forty-three percent were associated with head and neck surgery and 12.6% with upper abdominal procedures. Of these patients, 52% required further medical treatment or additional procedures and 16.2% required unplanned admission to an intensive care unit or a high dependency unit. A total of 31.5% of patients suffered from temporary harm and 1.8% from permanent harm. There was one death. The factors associated with a high relative risk (RR) of an airway incident included American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA PS) (ASA PS 2 versus 1, RR 1.75; ASA PS 3 versus 1, RR 3.56; ASA PS 4 versus 1, RR 6.1), and emergency surgery (RR 2.16 compared with elective). Sedation and monitored anaesthesia care were associated with lower RRs (RR 0.49 and RR 0.73 versus GA, respectively). Inadequate airway assessment, poor judgement and poor planning appeared to be contributors to these events. Future teaching and research should focus on these areas to further improve airway management and patient safety.
这项气道事件审计在澳大利亚和新西兰的12家三级医院进行了6个月。在此期间,131233名患者接受了气道管理,共提交了111份报告(发生率为0.08%)。气道事件包括困难气道管理(83例)、氧饱和度下降(58例)、误吸(19例)、反流(14例)、喉痉挛(16例)、气道出血(10例)、支气管痉挛(5例)和牙齿损伤(4例),111份报告中共有209起事件。大多数事件发生在全身麻醉期间(83.8%)和正常工作时间(81.1%)。43%与头颈外科手术有关,12.6%与上腹部手术有关。在这些患者中,52%需要进一步的医疗治疗或额外的手术,16.2%需要意外入住重症监护病房或高依赖病房。共有31.5%的患者受到暂时伤害,1.8%受到永久伤害。有1例死亡。与气道事件高相对风险(RR)相关的因素包括美国麻醉医师协会身体状况分级(ASA PS)(ASA PS 2级与1级相比,RR 1.75;ASA PS 3级与1级相比,RR 3.56;ASA PS 4级与1级相比,RR 6.1),以及急诊手术(与择期手术相比,RR 2.16)。镇静和监护麻醉护理与较低的RR相关(分别与全身麻醉相比,RR为0.49和RR为0.73)。气道评估不足、判断失误和计划不周似乎是这些事件的促成因素。未来的教学和研究应聚焦于这些领域,以进一步改善气道管理和患者安全。