Elhabashy Sameh, Moawad Amen
Faculty of Nursing, Cairo University, Cairo, 11562, Egypt.
Aswan Heart Centre - Magdi Yacoub Foundation, Aswan, Egypt.
BMC Nurs. 2024 Aug 27;23(1):599. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02232-0.
Self-directed learning (SDL) stands as a contemporary approach to learning, offering efficient and sustainable strategies for enhancing knowledge and practices. Given the pivotal role of nurses in ensuring patient safety and care effectiveness, this study aims to assess the impact of the SDL model compared to the traditional learning model (TLM) on elevating nurses' airway management (AM) competencies and minimizing airway-related incidents.
The study employed an experimental research design using a posttest-only control group structure within a two-group comparison framework. Seventy-two nurses participated, with 35 in the study group and 37 in the control group at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital affiliated with Cairo University, Egypt. The trial was carried out between February 2020 and July 2021. Following an assessment of SDL readiness for the intervention group, they received SDL model training based on Knowles' SDL principles, while the control group received TLM. The primary endpoint was a significant elevation in nurses' airway management competency, with the secondary outcome being a significant decrease in airway-related incidents reported by nurses. Competency assessments occurred immediately after completion of the intervention and again three months later.
A statistically significant difference was observed between the control and intervention groups regarding their practice and knowledge scores, with p-values of 0.02 and < 0.01, respectively. Additionally, the clinically relevant difference between control and intervention groups was evidenced by the effect size (ES) Cohen's d in both practices and knowledge levels (-0.56 and - 1.55, respectively). A significant difference was also noted between the first post-assessment and the paired second post-assessment concerning nurses' knowledge and practices among control and intervention groups, as indicated by the paired t-test with p < .01. Over three months, the intervention group reported 18 airway incidents, while the control group reported 24, with no statistically significant difference (> 0.05).
The SDL model significantly enhanced nurses' competencies in AM compared to the TLM. However, the efficacy of both learning models diminishes over time. Although nurses who underwent SDL model reported fewer airway incidents compared to those who received TLM approach of learning, no statistically significant difference was detected.
The study has been registered with Clinical Trials.gov under the registration number (NCT04244565) on 28/01/2020.
自主学习(SDL)是一种当代学习方法,为提升知识和实践提供了高效且可持续的策略。鉴于护士在确保患者安全和护理效果方面的关键作用,本研究旨在评估与传统学习模式(TLM)相比,SDL模式对提升护士气道管理(AM)能力以及减少气道相关事件的影响。
本研究采用实验性研究设计,在两组比较框架内采用仅后测对照组结构。72名护士参与了研究,埃及开罗大学附属妇产科医院的研究组有35名护士,对照组有37名护士。试验于2020年2月至2021年7月进行。在对干预组的SDL准备情况进行评估后,他们接受了基于诺尔斯SDL原则的SDL模式培训,而对照组接受TLM培训。主要终点是护士气道管理能力的显著提升,次要结果是护士报告的气道相关事件显著减少。在干预完成后立即以及三个月后再次进行能力评估。
在实践和知识得分方面,对照组和干预组之间观察到统计学上的显著差异,p值分别为0.02和<0.01。此外,对照组和干预组在实践和知识水平上的效应量(ES)科恩d值也证明了两组之间的临床相关差异(分别为-0.56和-1.55)。配对t检验表明,在对照组和干预组中,首次评估后与配对的第二次评估后护士的知识和实践之间也存在显著差异,p<0.01。在三个月的时间里,干预组报告了18起气道事件,而对照组报告了24起,无统计学显著差异(>0.05)。
与TLM相比,SDL模式显著提升了护士在AM方面的能力。然而,两种学习模式的效果都会随着时间而减弱。尽管接受SDL模式培训的护士报告的气道事件比接受TLM学习方法的护士少,但未检测到统计学上的显著差异。
该研究于2020年1月28日在ClinicalTrials.gov上注册,注册号为(NCT04244565)。