Suppr超能文献

眼科电子健康记录:医疗保健专业人员的可用性评估工具

The Electronic Health Record in Ophthalmology: Usability Evaluation Tools for Health Care Professionals.

作者信息

Logeswaran Abison, Chong Yu Jeat, Edmunds Matthew R

机构信息

Topol Digital Health Fellow, Health Education England, London, UK.

University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Ophthalmol Ther. 2021 Mar;10(1):13-20. doi: 10.1007/s40123-020-00315-0. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

The adoption of the electronic health record (EHR) has grown rapidly in ophthalmology. However, despite its potential advantages, its implementation has often led to dissatisfaction amongst health care professionals (HCP). This can be addressed using a user centred design (UCD) which is based on the philosophy that 'the final product should suit the users, rather than making the users suit the product'. There is often no agreed best practice on the role of HCPs in the UCD process. In this paper, we describe practical qualitative methodologies that can be used by HCPs in the design, implementation and evaluation of ophthalmology EHRs.

METHODS

A review of current qualitative usability methodologies was conducted by practising ophthalmologists who are also qualified health informaticians.

RESULTS

We identified several qualitative methodologies that could be used for EHR evaluation. These include: 1 Tools for user centred design: shadowing and autoethnography, semi-structured interviews and questionnaires 2 Tools for summative testing: card sort and reverse card sort, retrospective think aloud protocol, wireframing, screenshot testing and heat maps CONCLUSION: High-yield, low-fidelity tools can be used to engage HCPs with the process of ophthalmology EHR design, implementation and evaluation. These methods can be used by HCPs without the requirement for prior training in usability science, and by clinical centres without significant technical requirements.

摘要

引言

电子健康记录(EHR)在眼科领域的应用迅速增长。然而,尽管其具有潜在优势,但其实施往往导致医疗保健专业人员(HCP)不满。这可以通过以用户为中心的设计(UCD)来解决,该设计基于“最终产品应适合用户,而不是让用户适应产品”的理念。在UCD过程中,对于HCP的角色通常没有公认的最佳实践。在本文中,我们描述了HCP可用于眼科EHR设计、实施和评估的实用定性方法。

方法

由同时具备合格健康信息学专家资格的执业眼科医生对当前的定性可用性方法进行综述。

结果

我们确定了几种可用于EHR评估的定性方法。这些方法包括:1. 以用户为中心的设计工具:跟班观察和自我民族志、半结构化访谈和问卷调查;2. 总结性测试工具:卡片分类和反向卡片分类、回顾性出声思维协议、线框设计、屏幕截图测试和热图。结论:高产出、低保真度的工具可用于让HCP参与眼科EHR的设计、实施和评估过程。HCP无需事先接受可用性科学培训即可使用这些方法,临床中心也无需重大技术要求即可使用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a334/7886918/074c1f5663e4/40123_2020_315_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验