• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2018 年岚舒科学奖。

2018 Lush Science Prize.

机构信息

TJM Consultancy, Jaén, Spain.

出版信息

Altern Lab Anim. 2020 Nov;48(1_suppl):18S-25S. doi: 10.1177/0261192920912054.

DOI:10.1177/0261192920912054
PMID:33106014
Abstract

The Lush Prize supports animal-free testing by awarding money prizes of up to £350,000 per year to the most effective projects and individuals who have been working towards the goal of replacing animals in product or ingredient safety testing. Since its inception in 2012, the Lush Prize has distributed almost £2 million. Prizes are awarded for developments in five strategic areas: Science; Lobbying; Training; Public Awareness; and Young Researchers. In 2015, the judges also awarded a Black Box prize for the development of the skin sensitisation Adverse Outcome Pathway and its associated assays. The Science Prize is awarded to researchers whose work the judging panel believe to have made the most significant contribution, in the preceding year, to the replacement of animal testing. This 2018 Science Background paper outlines the research projects that were presented to the Prize judges as potential candidates for the 2018 Lush Science Prize award. To obtain an overview of developments in the field of animal replacement in toxicity research, recent work by the relevant scientific institutions and projects in this area, including the OECD, CAAT, ECVAM, UK NC3Rs, US Tox21 Programme, the ToxCast programme and EU-ToxRisk, was reviewed. Recent developments in toxicity testing research were investigated by searching the relevant literature. Abstracts from conferences focusing on animal replacement in toxicity testing that were held in the preceding 12 months, were also analysed, including those from the 2017 10th World Congress on Alternatives and Animals in the Life Sciences and the 2018 Society of Toxicology annual conference.

摘要

The Lush Prize 通过向每年最有效的项目和个人颁发高达 35 万英镑的奖金,来支持无动物测试,这些项目和个人一直在努力实现用动物替代产品或成分安全测试的目标。自 2012 年成立以来,Lush Prize 已分发了近 200 万英镑。奖项颁发给在五个战略领域取得进展的个人和项目:科学;游说;培训;公众意识;和青年研究人员。2015 年,评委们还因皮肤致敏性不良结局途径及其相关检测方法的发展颁发了一个“黑箱奖”。科学奖授予那些评审团认为在过去一年中对动物测试替代工作做出最重大贡献的研究人员。这份 2018 年科学背景文件概述了提交给该奖项评审团的潜在 2018 年 Lush 科学奖候选人的研究项目。为了全面了解毒性研究中动物替代领域的发展,我们查阅了相关科学机构的最新工作和该领域的项目,包括经合组织、CAAT、ECVAM、英国 NC3Rs、美国 Tox21 计划、ToxCast 计划和欧盟-ToxRisk。通过搜索相关文献,我们研究了毒性测试研究的最新进展。还分析了过去 12 个月内举行的专注于毒性测试动物替代的会议的摘要,包括 2017 年第 10 届替代与动物在生命科学中的世界大会和 2018 年毒理学学会年会的摘要。

相似文献

1
2018 Lush Science Prize.2018 年岚舒科学奖。
Altern Lab Anim. 2020 Nov;48(1_suppl):18S-25S. doi: 10.1177/0261192920912054.
2
2017 Lush Science Prize.2017年鲁什科学奖。
Altern Lab Anim. 2018 Sep;46(4):199-207. doi: 10.1177/026119291804600407.
3
2016 Lush Science Prize.2016年拉斯克科学奖。
Altern Lab Anim. 2017 Nov;45(5):231-240. doi: 10.1177/026119291704500508.
4
2015 Lush Science Prize.2015年鲁什科学奖。
Altern Lab Anim. 2016 Oct;44(5):461-468. doi: 10.1177/026119291604400510.
5
2014 Lush Science Prize.
Altern Lab Anim. 2015 Nov;43(5):313-23. doi: 10.1177/026119291504300505.
6
2013 Lush Science Prize.2013年拉斯克科学奖。
Altern Lab Anim. 2014 Dec;42(6):395-402. doi: 10.1177/026119291404200609.
7
The adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitisation: Moving closer to replacing animal testing.皮肤致敏的不良结局途径:向替代动物试验迈进
Altern Lab Anim. 2016 Oct;44(5):453-460. doi: 10.1177/026119291604400515.
8
The 2012 Lush Prize awards.2012年鲁什奖颁奖典礼。
Altern Lab Anim. 2013 Dec;41(6):419-22. doi: 10.1177/026119291304100601.
9
The 2017 Lush Prize Awards.2017年鲁什奖颁奖典礼。
Altern Lab Anim. 2018 Sep;46(4):187-191. doi: 10.1177/026119291804600405.
10
Development of an in silico profiler for respiratory sensitisation.用于呼吸道致敏的计算机模拟分析工具的开发。
Altern Lab Anim. 2014 Dec;42(6):367-75. doi: 10.1177/026119291404200606.