Wisconsin Diagnostic Laboratories, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
Medical College of Wisconsin, Department of Pathology, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Dec 17;59(1). doi: 10.1128/JCM.02104-20.
Critical evaluation of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) serologic assays is needed to guide clinical decision-making and ensure that these assays provide optimal benefit to patients and the public. Here, three commercially available assays with widespread distribution capabilities are compared. A total of 667 specimens, 103 from patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections and 564 collected prior to the emergence of SARS-CoV-2, were analyzed in parallel using the Roche Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 total antibody and Abbott Alinity SARS-CoV-2 IgG assays; a subset of 55 samples from patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections was additionally evaluated using the Abbott Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgM assay. Qualitative agreement between the Abbott IgG and Roche total antibody assays was 98.7% (658/667), with Cohen's kappa value of 0.919 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.867 to 0.972). Qualitative agreements with the Abbott IgM assay were 92.7% (51/55, Abbott IgG) and 85.5% (47/55, Roche total antibody). Diagnostic specificities determined using pre-COVID-19 samples for the Abbott IgG and Roche total antibody assays were 99.65% (95% CI, 98.72 to 99.90%) and 100.00% (95% CI, 99.32 to 100.00%), respectively, spanning claims made by each manufacturer. Diagnostic sensitivities increased for all three assays with increasing time since the onset of symptoms. Among 51 patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections, 23 (45.1%), 24 (47.1%), and 22 (43.1%) were reactive by the Abbott IgG, Roche total antibody, and Abbott IgM assays, respectively, with sampling times 0 to 56 days post-positive PCR (median/mean, 2/6.2 days). Combining IgG and IgM screening identified 4/55 additional samples with detectable antibodies that would not have been observed using the assays independently. Notably, one immunocompromised patient with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection showed no detectable antibodies using any of the three assays 43 days after onset of symptoms.
需要对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的血清学检测进行严格评估,以指导临床决策,并确保这些检测能为患者和公众带来最佳获益。本研究比较了三种具有广泛分布能力的商业检测方法。使用罗氏 Elecsys SARS-CoV-2 总抗体和雅培 Alinity SARS-CoV-2 IgG 检测方法,对 667 份标本(确诊 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者 103 份,SARS-CoV-2 出现前采集的标本 564 份)进行了平行分析;此外,还使用雅培 Architect SARS-CoV-2 IgM 检测方法对 55 份确诊 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者的样本子集进行了评估。雅培 IgG 和罗氏总抗体检测方法的定性一致性为 98.7%(658/667),Cohen's kappa 值为 0.919(95%置信区间 [CI],0.867 至 0.972)。雅培 IgM 检测方法的定性一致性分别为 92.7%(51/55,雅培 IgG)和 85.5%(47/55,罗氏总抗体)。使用 COVID-19 前样本确定的雅培 IgG 和罗氏总抗体检测方法的诊断特异性分别为 99.65%(95%CI,98.72% 至 99.90%)和 100.00%(95%CI,99.32% 至 100.00%),分别跨越了制造商各自宣称的范围。随着症状出现后时间的延长,三种检测方法的诊断敏感性均有所提高。在 51 例确诊 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者中,雅培 IgG、罗氏总抗体和雅培 IgM 检测方法分别有 23 例(45.1%)、24 例(47.1%)和 22 例(43.1%)呈阳性,采样时间分别为阳性 PCR 后 0 至 56 天(中位数/均值,2/6.2 天)。IgG 和 IgM 联合筛查发现了另外 4 份样本,这些样本用单独的检测方法无法观察到有可检测到的抗体。值得注意的是,有一位免疫功能低下的确诊 SARS-CoV-2 感染患者,在症状出现后 43 天,三种检测方法均未检测到抗体。