Polish Geological Institute-National Research Institute, Rakowiecka 4, 00-975, Warszawa, Poland.
Polish Geological Institute-National Research Institute, Upper Silesian Branch, Królowej Jadwigi 1, 41-200, Sosnowiec, Poland.
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 26;10(1):18283. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74671-z.
Fossil resins from Miocene coal deposit (Sarolangun mine, Jambi Province, Sumatra, Indonesia) have been analysed using spectroscopic methods: Raman Spectroscopy (RS), Fourier Transform-Infrared Spectroscopy (FT-IR), C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (C NMR), Fluorescence Spectroscopy (FS), and Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) in order to describe their diagnostic features. Simultaneously, glessite, a fossil resin from Upper Oligocene Bitterfeld deposit (Saxony-Anhalt, Germany), originating from similar botanical sources (i.e. angiosperms) was tested with the same analytical methods in order to find similarities and differences between the resins. The resins differ in colour, transparency and amounts of inclusions (resins from Sumatra-yellow, and transparent with few inclusions; glessite-brown-red, translucent with wealth of inclusions). In general, the IR and RS spectra of these resins are very similar, probably because the glessite colour-changing additives can be very subtle and non-observable in the infrared region. The RS spectra revealed also a slight difference in intensity ratio of the 1650/1450 cm bands (0.56 and 0.68 for Sumatra and Germany resins, respectively), indicating a differences in their maturation process. The resins from Sumatra seem to be more mature than glessite from Germany. The excitation-emission (EM-EX) and synchronous spectra showed unique, chemical compositions of these resins, which are different one from another. The GC-MS data for Sumatran resins, dominated by sesquiterpenoids and triterpenoids (amyrin), confirmed their botanical origin (angiosperms as their biological affinities). The sesquiterpenoid biomarkers with cadine-structures suggested the glessite underwent more advanced polymerization processes, which does not correlate with its RS spectrum. The geological factors, the environmental conditions of resin deposition, and later various diagenesis processes may have influenced the maturation and crosslinking of compounds. Despite the genetic similarity of the resins from various part of the world, Sumatra and Germany, advanced techniques such as Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry and Fluorescence Spectroscopy were the most useful to find the differences between them. These differences are predominantly a result of different diagenetic transformations of the resins.
来自中新世煤矿床(印度尼西亚苏门答腊占碑省 Sarolangun 矿区)的化石树脂已通过光谱方法进行了分析:拉曼光谱(RS)、傅里叶变换红外光谱(FT-IR)、C 核磁共振(C NMR)、荧光光谱(FS)和气相色谱-质谱联用(GC-MS),以描述其诊断特征。同时,gleissite 是一种来自上始新世 Bitterfeld 矿床(萨克森-安哈尔特州,德国)的化石树脂,源自相似的植物来源(即被子植物),并用相同的分析方法进行了测试,以发现树脂之间的相似之处和不同之处。树脂在颜色、透明度和内含物数量上有所不同(苏门答腊树脂-黄色,透明,内含物少;gleissite-棕色-红色,半透明,内含物丰富)。一般来说,这些树脂的红外和 RS 光谱非常相似,可能是因为 gleissite 的变色添加剂在红外区域可能非常微妙且不可观察。RS 光谱还揭示了 1650/1450 cm 带强度比的细微差异(苏门答腊和德国树脂分别为 0.56 和 0.68),表明它们的成熟过程存在差异。苏门答腊树脂似乎比德国的 gleissite 更成熟。激发-发射(EM-EX)和同步光谱显示了这些树脂独特的化学成分,彼此不同。苏门答腊树脂的 GC-MS 数据以倍半萜类和三萜类(羽扇豆醇)为主,证实了它们的植物来源(作为其生物亲缘关系的被子植物)。具有卡定结构的倍半萜类生物标志物表明 gleissite 经历了更先进的聚合过程,这与它的 RS 光谱不相关。地质因素、树脂沉积的环境条件以及后来的各种成岩作用过程可能影响了化合物的成熟和交联。尽管来自世界各地(苏门答腊和德国)的树脂具有遗传相似性,但气相色谱-质谱联用和荧光光谱等先进技术是发现它们之间差异的最有用方法。这些差异主要是树脂不同成岩转化的结果。