Suppr超能文献

大型综合医疗系统中抑郁症协作护理制度化路线图。

A Roadmap for Institutionalizing Collaborative Care for Depression in a Large Integrated Healthcare System.

作者信息

Coleman Karen J, Dreskin Mark, Hackett Daniel L, Aunskul Alisa, Liu Jialuo, Imley Tracy M, Wolfner Amy L, Beaubrun Gabrielle F

机构信息

Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California , 100 S. Los Robles, Pasadena, CA, 91104, USA.

Department of Family Medicine, Los Angeles Medical Center, Kaiser Permanente Southern California , Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):839-848. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06102-8. Epub 2020 Oct 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Collaborative models for depression have not been widely adopted throughout the USA, possibly because there are no successful roadmaps for implementing these types of models.

OBJECTIVE

To provide such a roadmap through a case study of the institutionalization of a depression care management (DCM) initiative for adult depression in a large healthcare system serving over 300,000 adults with depression.

DESIGN

A retrospective observational program evaluation. Program evaluation results are presented for those patients enrolled in the initiative from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

Over a 4-year period, 17,052 patients were treated in the DCM program. In general, participants were women (76%), were Hispanic (47%), spoke English (84%), and were 51.1 ± 18.3 years old, the majority of whom were 30-64 years old (57%).

INTERVENTION

The collaborative care portion of the DCM initiative (DCM program) was implemented by a collaborative care team containing a treatment specialist, an assessment specialist, administrative staff, a primary care physician, and a psychiatry physician.

MAIN MEASURES

The main outcome measures were total score on the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Outcomes were improvement (defined as at least 50% reduction in symptoms) and remission (defined as a PHQ-9 less than 5) of depression symptoms. Follow-up of depression symptoms was also collected at 6 months following discharge.

KEY RESULTS

The average course of treatment in 2018, after full implementation, was 4.6 ± 3.0 months; 62% of patients experienced improvement in symptoms, and 45% experienced remission of their depression at the time of discharge. These rates were maintained at the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Collaborative care for depression can be institutionalized in large healthcare systems and be sustained with a specific, detailed roadmap that includes workflows, training, treatment guidelines, and clear documentation standards that are linked to performance metrics. Extensive stakeholder engagement at every level is also critical for success.

摘要

背景

抑郁症协作模式在美国尚未得到广泛采用,可能是因为缺乏实施这类模式的成功路线图。

目的

通过对一家为超过30万名成年抑郁症患者提供服务的大型医疗系统中成人抑郁症护理管理(DCM)倡议的制度化案例研究,提供这样一份路线图。

设计

一项回顾性观察性项目评估。呈现了2015年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间参与该倡议的患者的项目评估结果。

参与者

在4年期间,17052名患者接受了DCM项目治疗。总体而言,参与者为女性(76%),西班牙裔(47%),说英语(84%),年龄为51.1±18.3岁,其中大多数为30 - 64岁(57%)。

干预

DCM倡议的协作护理部分(DCM项目)由一个协作护理团队实施,该团队包括一名治疗专家、一名评估专家、行政人员、一名初级保健医生和一名精神科医生。

主要测量指标

主要结局指标为9项患者健康问卷(PHQ - 9)的总分。结局为抑郁症症状改善(定义为症状至少减轻50%)和缓解(定义为PHQ - 9小于5)。出院后6个月也收集了抑郁症症状的随访情况。

关键结果

全面实施后,2018年的平均治疗疗程为4.6±3.0个月;62%的患者症状得到改善,45%的患者在出院时抑郁症得到缓解。这些比率在6个月随访时得以维持。

结论

抑郁症协作护理可在大型医疗系统中制度化,并通过一份具体、详细的路线图得以维持,该路线图包括工作流程、培训、治疗指南以及与绩效指标相关的清晰文档标准。各级广泛的利益相关者参与对成功也至关重要。

相似文献

1
A Roadmap for Institutionalizing Collaborative Care for Depression in a Large Integrated Healthcare System.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):839-848. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06102-8. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
3
Effectiveness of collaborative care for depression in Italy. A randomized controlled trial.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2013 Nov-Dec;35(6):579-86. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2013.07.009. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
9
Characteristics, management, and depression outcomes of primary care patients who endorse thoughts of death or suicide on the PHQ-9.
J Gen Intern Med. 2013 Mar;28(3):363-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-012-2194-2. Epub 2012 Aug 31.
10
Collaborative care for adolescent depression: a pilot study.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2009 Jan-Feb;31(1):36-45. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2008.09.019. Epub 2008 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

6
Trends in U.S. Depression Prevalence From 2015 to 2020: The Widening Treatment Gap.
Am J Prev Med. 2022 Nov;63(5):726-733. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2022.05.014. Epub 2022 Sep 19.
7
Responding to the Call: a New JGIM Area of Emphasis for Implementation and Quality Improvement Sciences.
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Nov;35(Suppl 2):781-782. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06229-8.

本文引用的文献

1
Large-Scale Implementation of Collaborative Care Management for Depression and Diabetes and/or Cardiovascular Disease.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Sep-Oct;31(5):702-711. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.05.170102.
3
Impact of a national collaborative care initiative for patients with depression and diabetes or cardiovascular disease.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2017 Jan-Feb;44:77-85. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2016.05.006. Epub 2016 Aug 22.
5
Limitations of the Patient Health Questionnaire in Identifying Anxiety and Depression: Many Cases Are Undetected.
Res Soc Work Pract. 2006 Nov 1;16(6):625-631. doi: 10.1177/1049731506291582.
6
Explaining Matching Michigan: an ethnographic study of a patient safety program.
Implement Sci. 2013 Jun 20;8:70. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-8-70.
9
Quality improvement with pay-for-performance incentives in integrated behavioral health care.
Am J Public Health. 2012 Jun;102(6):e41-5. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2011.300555. Epub 2012 Apr 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验