From Kaiser Permanente Colorado Institute for Health Research, Denver, CO (AB, JMB); Department of Research and Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA (AA, KJC); Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement, Bloomington, MN (CN); Psychiatry and Psychology Division of Integrated Behavioral Health, Mayo Clinic, Rochester (MDW); Pittsburgh Regional Health Initiative, Pittsburgh, PA (RF); HealthPartners Institute, Minneapolis (RCR, LIS).
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 Sep-Oct;31(5):702-711. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.05.170102.
Collaborative care models have been shown to improve mental and physical health, but their effectiveness varies. Implementation science frameworks identify measures at the structural (eg, sociocultural context, public policies), organizational, provider, innovation, and patient levels that may facilitate or impede collaborative care effectiveness.
To describe commonalities and variation in multilevel measures associated with the implementation of Care of Mental, Physical, and Substance-Use Syndromes (COMPASS), a large-scale collaborative care intervention for depression, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease.
Qualitative study using semistructured descriptive data obtained from annual site visit reports and supplemental site surveys.
COMPASS care teams from 8 health care systems serving 3854 patients with active depression and poorly controlled diabetes and/or cardiovascular disease.
COMPASS included weekly case reviews with a consulting physician and psychiatrist, a patient-tracking registry, and monitoring of hospital and emergency department use.
Site visit reports were analyzed with Atlas.ti software to qualitatively describe implementation measures and their variation across sites.
Nine measures were identified that impacted implementation efforts across health systems: (1) challenges in health systems' organizational environments, (2) prior care coordination experience, (3) physician engagement, (4) care team trust and cohesion, (5) care manager training and experience, (6) patient enrollment length, attainment of clinical targets, and frequency/content of care manager contacts, (7) patient-tracking registries, (8) quality improvement and outcomes monitoring reports, and (9) patients' social needs.
Understanding multilevel measures impacting COMPASS implementation could increase the success of future collaborative care implementation efforts.
协作式护理模式已被证明可以改善身心健康,但效果存在差异。实施科学框架确定了结构层面(如社会文化背景、公共政策)、组织层面、提供者层面、创新层面和患者层面的措施,这些措施可能会促进或阻碍协作式护理的效果。
描述与大规模协作式护理干预措施(Care of Mental, Physical, and Substance-Use Syndromes,COMPASS)实施相关的多层次措施的共同之处和差异,该干预措施针对抑郁、糖尿病和心血管疾病。
使用半结构化描述性数据的定性研究,这些数据来自于年度现场访问报告和补充现场调查。
来自 8 个医疗保健系统的 COMPASS 护理团队,服务对象为 3854 名患有活跃性抑郁症和糖尿病控制不佳和/或心血管疾病的患者。
COMPASS 包括每周与顾问医生和精神科医生进行病例审查、患者跟踪登记册以及监测医院和急诊部门的使用情况。
使用 Atlas.ti 软件对现场访问报告进行分析,以定性描述实施措施及其在各站点的差异。
确定了 9 项影响整个医疗系统实施工作的措施:(1)医疗系统组织环境中的挑战,(2)先前的护理协调经验,(3)医生参与度,(4)护理团队的信任与凝聚力,(5)护理经理的培训和经验,(6)患者登记长度、达到临床目标以及护理经理联系的频率/内容,(7)患者跟踪登记册,(8)质量改进和结果监测报告,以及(9)患者的社会需求。
了解影响 COMPASS 实施的多层次措施可以提高未来协作式护理实施工作的成功率。