• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

为何学校工作人员有时未能报告潜在的受害案件?一项混合方法研究。

Why Do School Staff Sometimes Fail to Report Potential Victimization Cases? A Mixed-methods Study.

作者信息

Greco Ana M, Gómez Eva Pérez, Pereda Noemí, Guilera Georgina, González Iriana Santos

机构信息

Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Universidad de Cantabria, Cantabria, Spain.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2022 May;37(9-10):NP7242-NP7267. doi: 10.1177/0886260520969243. Epub 2020 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1177/0886260520969243
PMID:33107364
Abstract

Schools are in a position to connect children and adolescents suspected of being victims of violence with an external source of support by making referrals to external agencies. However, several studies have identified obstacles that hinder early reporting among school staff members. Very few studies have applied a mixed-method approach to try to understand this sensitive issue. The current study used this approach to analyze to what extent the students suspected of being victimized match the ones reported by active school staff members in Spain ( = 453, 83.5% females, age: = 42.23, = 9.46). We classified the reasons given for not reporting the potential victimization cases encountered and made comparisons to determine whether there were differences in the level of knowledge, or in the sociodemographic characteristics, of respondents who gave different reasons for not reporting. Although 73.5% of school staff members had detected at least one potential case, 40.8% of them referred it to an external agency. The most common reasons for lack of reporting included deciding not to do so once concerns had been shared within the school and believing that one must be certain or that only serious violence should be reported. The findings of this study may help to further understand the decisions not to report certain suspicions of potential victimization cases to external agencies by school staff. There is an urgent need to raise awareness about the duty to report these concerns to external agencies, even in the absence of agreement from the school management team. Members of school staff need to be strongly encouraged to become familiar with the existing protocols.

摘要

学校能够通过向外部机构转介,将疑似暴力受害者的儿童和青少年与外部支持来源联系起来。然而,多项研究已经确定了阻碍学校工作人员早期报告的障碍。很少有研究采用混合方法来试图理解这个敏感问题。本研究采用这种方法来分析在西班牙,疑似受侵害的学生与积极的学校工作人员报告的学生在多大程度上相符(n = 453,83.5%为女性,年龄:M = 42.23,SD = 9.46)。我们对未报告所遇到的潜在受害案件的原因进行了分类,并进行比较,以确定给出不同未报告原因的受访者在知识水平或社会人口特征方面是否存在差异。尽管73.5%的学校工作人员至少发现了一起潜在案件,但其中40.8%的人将其转介给了外部机构。未报告的最常见原因包括在学校内部分享担忧后决定不报告,以及认为必须确定或只应报告严重暴力行为。本研究的结果可能有助于进一步理解学校工作人员不向外部机构报告某些潜在受害案件怀疑的决定。迫切需要提高人们对向外部机构报告这些担忧的责任的认识,即使没有得到学校管理团队的同意。需要大力鼓励学校工作人员熟悉现有的程序。

相似文献

1
Why Do School Staff Sometimes Fail to Report Potential Victimization Cases? A Mixed-methods Study.为何学校工作人员有时未能报告潜在的受害案件?一项混合方法研究。
J Interpers Violence. 2022 May;37(9-10):NP7242-NP7267. doi: 10.1177/0886260520969243. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
2
School staff members experience and knowledge in the reporting of potential child and youth victimization.学校工作人员在报告潜在的儿童和青少年受害方面的经验和知识。
Child Abuse Negl. 2017 Oct;72:22-31. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
3
Peer and self-reported victimization: Do non-victimized students give victimization nominations to classmates who are self-reported victims?同伴报告与自我报告的受侵害情况:未受侵害的学生是否会将受侵害提名指向那些自我报告为受害者的同学?
J Sch Psychol. 2015 Aug;53(4):309-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2015.05.003. Epub 2015 Jul 10.
4
Transition From School Violence Victimization to Reporting Victimized Experiences: A Latent Transition Analysis.从校园暴力受害到报告受害经历的转变:潜在类别转移分析。
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Sep;38(17-18):9717-9738. doi: 10.1177/08862605231168818. Epub 2023 Apr 27.
5
Examining the Intersection of Bullying and Physical Relationship Violence Among New York City High School Students.探究纽约市高中生中霸凌行为与恋爱关系暴力行为的交叉情况。
J Interpers Violence. 2017 Jan;32(1):49-75. doi: 10.1177/0886260515585532. Epub 2015 May 7.
6
Additive Interactions Between School Bullying Victimization and Gender on Weapon Carrying Among U.S. High School Students: Youth Risk Behavior Survey 2009 to 2015.美国高中生中校园欺凌受害与性别对携带武器的累加交互作用:2009 至 2015 年青少年风险行为调查。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Oct;36(19-20):NP10886-NP10907. doi: 10.1177/0886260519877945. Epub 2019 Oct 3.
7
Teacher and staff perceptions of school environment as predictors of student aggression, victimization, and willingness to intervene in bullying situations.教师和工作人员对学校环境的看法作为学生攻击行为、受欺负情况以及在欺凌情境中进行干预意愿的预测因素。
Sch Psychol Q. 2014 Sep;29(3):287-305. doi: 10.1037/spq0000072. Epub 2014 Aug 4.
8
Exposure to parental and community violence and the relationship to bullying perpetration and victimization among early adolescents: A parallel process growth mixture latent transition analysis.青少年期早期父母和社区暴力暴露与欺凌行为和受害的关系:平行过程增长混合潜在转移分析。
Scand J Psychol. 2020 Feb;61(1):77-89. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12493. Epub 2018 Oct 2.
9
Cyberbullying Victimization in WhatsApp Classmate Groups among Israeli Elementary, Middle, and High School Students.以色列中小学生在 WhatsApp 同学群中遭受网络欺凌的情况。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Aug;36(15-16):NP8498-NP8519. doi: 10.1177/0886260519842860. Epub 2019 Apr 22.
10
Teachers victimizing students: Contributions of student-to-teacher victimization, peer victimization, school safety, and school climate in Chile.教师对学生的伤害:智利学生对教师的伤害、同伴伤害、学校安全和学校氛围的影响。
Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2020;90(4):432-444. doi: 10.1037/ort0000445. Epub 2020 Mar 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Teachers' Responses to Child Maltreatment.教师对儿童虐待的反应。
J Child Adolesc Trauma. 2022 Aug 4;16(1):95-108. doi: 10.1007/s40653-022-00473-2. eCollection 2023 Mar.
2
How can school help victims of violence? Evaluation of online training for European schools' staff from a multidisciplinary approach.学校如何帮助暴力受害者?从多学科角度评估针对欧洲学校工作人员的在线培训。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 15;17(8):e0272872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272872. eCollection 2022.