Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA,
Department of Behavioral, Social, and Health Education Sciences, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Public Health Genomics. 2020;23(5-6):252-256. doi: 10.1159/000511131. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
In this brief report, we ask whether women's interpretation of breast cancer risk based on their low likelihood of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation is associated with their information-sharing behavior, and whether misinterpretation is associated with motives for sharing the result.
Women in mammography clinics who completed a brief family history assessment and deemed to be at low likelihood of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation were asked to complete a 1-time online survey between June 2016 and January 2017.
One-third (44/148) of women shared their family history screen result with someone in their social network. Result information was shared largely with a first-degree female relative to express feelings of relief (77%, 33/43). There were no differences in likelihood of sharing based on breast cancer risk interpretation. However, women who misinterpreted the implications of the result for general breast cancer risk reported more motives to share the result with their social network than those who accurately interpreted their breast cancer risk.
As family history-based screening for hereditary breast cancer is broadly implemented, the communication needs of the majority of women who will be unlikely of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation must be considered. The motives of women who misinterpreted the implications of this result for breast cancer risk suggest the possibility that miscommunication could be spread to the broader family network.
在这份简短的报告中,我们探讨了女性基于自身携带 BRCA1/2 突变低可能性对乳腺癌风险的解读,是否与其信息共享行为相关,以及是否存在误解,以及这种误解是否与分享结果的动机相关。
在 2016 年 6 月至 2017 年 1 月期间,我们在乳腺摄影诊所中招募了完成简短家族史评估且被认为携带 BRCA1/2 突变低可能性的女性,要求她们完成一次在线调查。
三分之一(44/148)的女性与社交网络中的某人分享了她们的家族史筛查结果。结果信息主要与一级女性亲属分享,以表达解脱感(77%,33/43)。但是,基于对结果的乳腺癌风险解读,分享的可能性没有差异。然而,与准确解读其乳腺癌风险的女性相比,误解结果对一般乳腺癌风险影响的女性报告了更多分享结果给社交网络的动机。
随着基于家族史的遗传性乳腺癌筛查的广泛实施,必须考虑到大多数不太可能携带 BRCA1/2 突变的女性的沟通需求。误解这一结果对乳腺癌风险影响的女性的动机表明,错误信息可能会传播到更广泛的家庭网络。