Department of Oncology, Queen's University, 25 King Street West, Kingston, K7L 5P9, Canada.
J Cancer Educ. 2022 Jun;37(3):852-856. doi: 10.1007/s13187-020-01895-y. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
As part of a university-wide initiative, competency-based medical education (CBME) was implemented in the Medical Oncology training program at Queen's University in July 2017. Stages, entrustable professional activities (EPAs), and required training experiences established by the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) national subspecialty committee were adopted. Entrada (Elentra), the electronic portfolio developed at Queen's University, was used for assessment collection. Between July 2017 and December 2018, participating faculty members completed 157 assessments. Eighty-nine percent were EPA assessments with a median of 16 assessments per faculty member (range 1-40). Ninety-five percent of assessments included written "Comments" or "Next steps" with 56% of all assessments including specific or actionable feedback. Discussions between the program director, residents, program administrator, CBME education consultant, and CBME lead led to the identification of 9 lessons learned during implementation. These centered on (1) faculty and resident development and engagement; (2) sharing the work of CBME; (3) collaboration and communication; (4) global assessment; (5) assessment plan challenges; (6) burden of CBME; (7) limitations of e-portfolio; (8) importance of early tracking of resident progress; and (9) culture change. This article describes the experience of the authors and considers strategies that may be helpful to programs implementing CBME in their teaching and learning environment.
作为大学范围内的一项倡议的一部分,基于能力的医学教育 (CBME) 于 2017 年 7 月在皇后大学的医学肿瘤学培训计划中实施。采用了加拿大皇家内科医师和外科医师学院 (RCPSC) 国家专科委员会制定的阶段、可委托的专业活动 (EPAs) 和所需的培训经验。Entrada (Elentra) 是皇后大学开发的电子档案,用于评估收集。在 2017 年 7 月至 2018 年 12 月期间,参与的教师完成了 157 项评估。89%是 EPA 评估,每位教师中位数为 16 项评估(范围 1-40)。95%的评估包括书面“评论”或“下一步”,其中 56%的评估包括具体或可操作的反馈。课程主任、住院医师、课程管理员、CBME 教育顾问和 CBME 负责人之间的讨论确定了在实施过程中吸取的 9 条经验教训。这些经验教训主要集中在以下几个方面:(1) 教师和住院医师的发展和参与;(2) 分享 CBME 的工作;(3) 协作和沟通;(4) 全球评估;(5) 评估计划挑战;(6) CBME 的负担;(7) 电子档案的局限性;(8) 早期跟踪住院医师进展的重要性;以及 (9) 文化变革。本文描述了作者的经验,并考虑了在教学环境中实施 CBME 可能对计划有帮助的策略。