Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 850 W. Baltimore Street, Baltimore, MD, 21202, USA.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Radiat Oncol. 2020 Oct 27;15(1):245. doi: 10.1186/s13014-020-01644-x.
Stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may act synergistically to improve treatment outcomes but may also increase the risk of symptomatic radiation necrosis (RN). The objective of this study was to compare outcomes for patients undergoing SRT with and without concurrent ICI.
Patients treated for BMs with single or multi-fraction SRT were retrospectively reviewed. Concurrent ICI with SRT (SRT-ICI) was defined as administration within 3 months of SRT. Local control (LC), radiation necrosis (RN) risk and distant brain failure (DBF) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the log-rank test. Wilcoxon rank sum and Chi-square tests were used to compare covariates. Multivariate cox regression analysis (MVA) was performed.
One hundred seventy-nine patients treated with SRT for 385 brain lesions were included; 36 patients with 99 lesions received SRT-ICI. Median follow up was 10.3 months (SRT alone) and 7.7 months (SRT- ICI) (p = 0.08). Lesions treated with SRT-ICI were more commonly squamous histology (17% vs 8%) melanoma (20% vs 2%) or renal cell carcinoma (8% vs 6%), (p < 0.001). Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) compromised 60% of patients receiving ICI (n = 59). Lesions treated with SRT-ICI had significantly improved 1-year local control compared to SRT alone (98 and 89.5%, respectively (p = 0.0078). On subset analysis of NSCLC patients alone, ICI was also associated with improved 1 year local control (100% vs. 90.1%) (p = 0.018). On MVA, only tumor size ≤2 cm was significantly associated with LC (HR 0.38, p = 0.02), whereas the HR for concurrent ICI with SRS was 0.26 (p = 0.08). One year DBF (41% vs. 53%; p = 0.21), OS (58% vs. 56%; p = 0.79) and RN incidence (7% vs. 4%; p = 0.25) were similar for SRT alone versus SRT-ICI, for the population as a whole and those patients with NSCLC.
These results suggest SRT-ICI may improve local control of brain metastases and is not associated with an increased risk of symptomatic radiation necrosis in a cohort of predominantly NSCLC patients. Larger, prospective studies are necessary to validate these findings and better elucidate the impact of SRT-ICI on other disease outcomes.
立体定向放射治疗(SRT)和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)联合应用可能具有协同作用,改善治疗效果,但也可能增加症状性放射性坏死(RN)的风险。本研究的目的是比较接受 SRT 联合和不联合 ICI 治疗的患者的结局。
回顾性分析了接受 SRT 治疗的脑转移瘤患者。SRT 联合 ICI(SRT-ICI)定义为 SRT 后 3 个月内使用 ICI。通过 Kaplan-Meier 法估计局部控制(LC)、放射性坏死(RN)风险和远处脑失败(DBF),并用对数秩检验比较组间差异。Wilcoxon 秩和检验和卡方检验用于比较协变量。采用多变量 Cox 回归分析(MVA)。
共纳入 179 例接受 SRT 治疗 385 个脑转移瘤的患者,36 例患者 99 个病灶接受 SRT-ICI 治疗。中位随访时间为 SRT 单独治疗组为 10.3 个月,SRT-ICI 组为 7.7 个月(p=0.08)。SRT-ICI 治疗的病灶更常见鳞状组织学(17% vs. 8%)、黑色素瘤(20% vs. 2%)或肾细胞癌(8% vs. 6%)(p<0.001)。非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)占接受 ICI 治疗患者的 60%(n=59)。与 SRT 单独治疗相比,SRT-ICI 治疗的病灶 1 年局部控制率显著提高(分别为 98%和 89.5%(p=0.0078))。在 NSCLC 患者的亚组分析中,ICI 也与 1 年局部控制率的提高相关(100% vs. 90.1%)(p=0.018)。在 MVA 中,只有肿瘤大小≤2cm 与 LC 显著相关(HR 0.38,p=0.02),而 SRS 联合 ICI 的 HR 为 0.26(p=0.08)。SRT 单独治疗与 SRT-ICI 治疗的 1 年远处脑失败率(41% vs. 53%;p=0.21)、总生存率(58% vs. 56%;p=0.79)和放射性坏死发生率(7% vs. 4%;p=0.25)在总体人群和 NSCLC 患者中均相似。
这些结果表明,SRT-ICI 可能改善脑转移瘤的局部控制率,并且在主要为 NSCLC 患者的队列中,不会增加症状性放射性坏死的风险。需要更大规模的前瞻性研究来验证这些发现,并更好地阐明 SRT-ICI 对其他疾病结局的影响。