Kayama Takamasa, Sato Shinya, Sakurada Kaori, Mizusawa Junki, Nishikawa Ryo, Narita Yoshitaka, Sumi Minako, Miyakita Yasuji, Kumabe Toshihiro, Sonoda Yukihiko, Arakawa Yoshiki, Miyamoto Susumu, Beppu Takaaki, Sugiyama Kazuhiko, Nakamura Hirohiko, Nagane Motoo, Nakasu Yoko, Hashimoto Naoya, Terasaki Mizuhiko, Matsumura Akira, Ishikawa Eiichi, Wakabayashi Toshihiko, Iwadate Yasuo, Ohue Shiro, Kobayashi Hiroyuki, Kinoshita Manabu, Asano Kenichiro, Mukasa Akitake, Tanaka Katsuyuki, Asai Akio, Nakamura Hideo, Abe Tatsuya, Muragaki Yoshihiro, Iwasaki Koichi, Aoki Tomokazu, Watanabe Takao, Sasaki Hikaru, Izumoto Shuichi, Mizoguchi Masahiro, Matsuo Takayuki, Takeshima Hideo, Hayashi Motohiro, Jokura Hidefumi, Mizowaki Takashi, Shimizu Eiji, Shirato Hiroki, Tago Masao, Katayama Hiroshi, Fukuda Haruhiko, Shibui Soichiro
Takamasa Kayama, Shinya Sato, Kaori Sakurada, Yukihiko Sonoda, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata; Junki Mizusawa, Yoshitaka Narita, Yasuji Miyakita, Hiroshi Katayama, Haruhiko Fukuda, Soichiro Shibui, National Cancer Center Hospital; Minako Sumi, Cancer Institute Hospital; Akitake Mukasa, The University of Tokyo Graduate School of Medicine; Yoshihiro Muragaki, Motohiro Hayashi, Tokyo Women's Medical University; Takao Watanabe, Nihon University School of Medicine; Hikaru Sasaki, Keio University School of Medicine; Masao Tago, Teikyo University Mizonokuchi Hospital; Motoo Nagane, Kyorin University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo; Ryo Nishikawa, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama; Toshihiro Kumabe, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine; Eiji Shimizu, Tohoku University Hospital; Hidefumi Jokura, Furukawa Seiryo Hospital, Miyagi; Yoshiki Arakawa, Susumu Miyamoto, Takashi Mizowaki, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto; Takaaki Beppu, Iwate Medical University, Morioka; Kazuhiko Sugiyama, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima; Hirohiko Nakamura, Nakamura Memorial Hospital, Sapporo; Yoko Nakasu, Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka; Naoya Hashimoto, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine; Manabu Kinoshita, Osaka International Cancer Institute; Akio Asai, Kansai Medical University; Koichi Iwasaki, Kitano Hospital; Tomokazu Aoki, Kitano Medical Research Institute and Hospital, Osaka; Mizuhiko Terasaki, Kurume University, Kurume; Akira Matsumura, Eiichi Ishikawa, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba; Toshihiko Wakabayashi, Nagoya University, Nagoya; Yasuo Iwadate, Chiba University, Chiba; Shiro Ohue, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime; Hiroyuki Kobayashi, Hiroki Shirato, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido; Kenichiro Asano, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki City; Katsuyuki Tanaka, St Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa; Hideo Nakamura, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto; Tatsuya Abe, Oita University Faculty of Medicine, Oita; Shuichi Izumoto, Hyogo College of Medicine, Hyogo; Masahiro Mizoguchi, Kyushu University, Fukuoka; Takayuki Matsuo, Nagasaki Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki; and Hideo Takeshima, University of Miyazaki, Miyazaki, Japan.
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 20:JCO2018786186. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2018.78.6186.
Purpose Whereas whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has been the standard treatment of brain metastases (BMs), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is increasingly preferred to avoid cognitive dysfunction; however, it has not been clearly determined whether treatment with SRS is as effective as that with WBRT or WBRT plus SRS. We thus assessed the noninferiority of salvage SRS to WBRT in patients with BMs. Patients and Methods Patients age 20 to 79 years old with performance status scores of 0 to 2-and 3 if caused only by neurologic deficits-and with four or fewer surgically resected BMs with only one lesion > 3 cm in diameter were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned to WBRT or salvage SRS arms within 21 days of surgery. The primary end point was overall survival. A one-sided α of .05 was used. Results Between January 2006 and May 2014, 137 and 134 patients were enrolled in the WBRT and salvage SRS arms, respectively. Median overall survival was 15.6 months in both arms (hazard ratio, 1.05; 90% CI, 0.83 to 1.33; one-sided P for noninferiority = .027). Median intracranial progression-free survival of patients in the WBRT arm (10.4 months) was longer than that of patients in the salvage SRS arm (4.0 months). The proportions of patients whose Mini-Mental Status Examination and performance status scores that did not worsen at 12 months were similar in both arms; however, 16.4% of patients in the WBRT arm experienced grade 2 to 4 cognitive dysfunction after 91 days postenrollment, whereas only 7.7% of those in the SRS arm did ( P = .048). Conclusion Salvage SRS is noninferior to WBRT and can be established as a standard therapy for patients with four or fewer BMs.
目的 全脑放疗(WBRT)一直是脑转移瘤(BMs)的标准治疗方法,而立体定向放射外科治疗(SRS)越来越多地被用于避免认知功能障碍;然而,SRS治疗是否与WBRT或WBRT联合SRS治疗同样有效尚未明确确定。因此,我们评估了挽救性SRS对比WBRT治疗BMs患者的非劣效性。
患者与方法 年龄20至79岁、体能状态评分为0至2分(若仅由神经功能缺损导致则为3分)、手术切除的BMs为4个或更少且直径>3 cm的病灶仅1个的患者符合条件。患者在手术后21天内被随机分配至WBRT组或挽救性SRS组。主要终点为总生存期。采用单侧α为0.05。
结果 2006年1月至2014年5月,分别有137例和134例患者入组WBRT组和挽救性SRS组。两组的中位总生存期均为15.6个月(风险比,1.05;90% CI,0.83至1.33;非劣效性单侧P = 0.027)。WBRT组患者的中位颅内无进展生存期(10.4个月)长于挽救性SRS组患者(4.0个月)。两组在12个月时简易精神状态检查和体能状态评分未恶化的患者比例相似;然而,WBRT组16.4%的患者在入组后91天出现2至4级认知功能障碍,而SRS组仅7.7%的患者出现(P = 0.048)。
结论 挽救性SRS不劣于WBRT,可被确立为BMs为4个或更少的患者的标准治疗方法。