Chow Jonathan J, Beckmann Joshua S
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, 741 S. Limestone, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2021 Jan 1;218:108369. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108369. Epub 2020 Oct 18.
Preclinical studies into drug vs. nondrug choice have emerged to better model and investigate the neurobehavioral mechanisms underlying drug preference. Current literature has suggested that drugs of abuse have inherently low value, thus promoting food preference. Herein, we examined remifentanil vs. food choice to test both the relative value hypothesis and the 'direct effects' (pharmacological effects of drugs on alternative reinforcers) hypothesis of opioid preference.
Adult male rats were trained under two choice procedures (controlled vs. uncontrolled reinforcer frequency) for remifentanil vs. food choice. Furthermore, a series of procedural manipulations known to affect drug reinforcement were tested under both choice procedures. Using remifentanil self-administration data, pharmacokinetic profiles were calculated and analyzed to determine if opioid intake was related to opioid preference.
Both choice procedures produced dose-dependent preference. Moreover, procedural manipulations produced comparable changes in remifentanil preference under both choice procedures. In addition, calculated pharmacokinetic data revealed that preference was dissociable from intake under the controlled reinforcer frequency choice procedure.
When compared to the 'direct effects' hypothesis, remifentanil preference was better predicted by the relative value hypothesis, formalized in generalized matching. Use of a controlled reinforcer frequency schedule successfully removed the drug preference-intake confound found in most drug-choice procedures. Importantly, drug preference under the controlled reinforcer frequency schedule remained sensitive to procedural manipulations known to affect drug reinforcement. Thus, given that differential drug intake itself affects neurobiological measurements, future use of controlled reinforcer frequency schedules may help to better isolate the neurobehavioral mechanisms that mediate opioid preference.
关于药物与非药物选择的临床前研究不断涌现,旨在更好地模拟和研究药物偏好背后的神经行为机制。当前文献表明,滥用药物本身价值较低,从而促进了对食物的偏好。在此,我们研究了瑞芬太尼与食物的选择,以检验阿片类药物偏好的相对价值假说和“直接效应”(药物对替代强化物的药理作用)假说。
成年雄性大鼠在两种选择程序(强化物频率可控与不可控)下接受瑞芬太尼与食物选择的训练。此外,在两种选择程序下测试了一系列已知会影响药物强化的程序操作。利用瑞芬太尼自我给药数据,计算并分析药代动力学特征,以确定阿片类药物摄入量是否与阿片类药物偏好相关。
两种选择程序均产生剂量依赖性偏好。此外,程序操作在两种选择程序下对瑞芬太尼偏好产生了类似的变化。此外,计算得到的药代动力学数据显示,在强化物频率可控的选择程序下,偏好与摄入量可分离。
与“直接效应”假说相比,相对价值假说(在广义匹配中形式化)能更好地预测瑞芬太尼偏好。使用强化物频率可控的时间表成功消除了大多数药物选择程序中发现的药物偏好 - 摄入量混淆。重要的是,强化物频率可控时间表下的药物偏好对已知会影响药物强化的程序操作仍保持敏感。因此,鉴于不同的药物摄入量本身会影响神经生物学测量,未来使用强化物频率可控时间表可能有助于更好地分离介导阿片类药物偏好的神经行为机制。