Deslauriers Simon, Roy Jean-Sébastien, Bernatsky Sasha, Feldman Debbie E, Pinard Anne Marie, Desmeules François, Fitzcharles Mary-Ann, Perreault Kadija
Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration (CIRRIS), 525, boulevard W.-Hamel, Quebec, QC G1M 2S8 Canada.
Faculty of medicine, Université Laval, CHUL, 2705, boulevard Laurier, #3412, Quebec, QC G1V 4G2 Canada.
BMC Rheumatol. 2020 Oct 23;4:59. doi: 10.1186/s41927-020-00157-0. eCollection 2020.
Access to multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities (MPTF) is limited by extensive waiting time in many countries. However, there is a lack of knowledge about the impact of waiting time on clinical outcomes, particularly for patients with rheumatic conditions. This study examined the association between waiting time for MPTF and clinical outcomes in patients with rheumatic conditions.
Data were extracted from the Quebec Pain Registry, a large database of patients who received services in MPTF. The associations between waiting time (classified as < 2 months, 2-6 months and > 6 months) and change in pain interference, pain intensity and health-related quality of life, from the initial visit at the MPTF to the 6-month follow-up, were tested using generalized estimating equations.
A total of 3230 patients with rheumatic conditions (mean age: 55.8 ± 14.0 years; 66% were women) were included in the analysis. Small significant differences in improvement between waiting time groups were revealed, with patients waiting less than 2 months having a larger improvement in all clinical outcomes compared to patients who waited 2-6 months or over 6 months before their initial visit (adjusted time X group effect ≤ 0.001). Only patients waiting less than 2 months reached a clinically important improvement in pain interference (1.12/10), pain intensity (1.3/10) and physical and mental quality of life (3.9 and 3.7/100).
Longer delays experienced by patients before receiving services in MPTF were associated with statistically significant smaller improvements in pain interference, pain intensity and health-related quality of life; these differences were, however, not clinically significant. Based on these results, we advise that strategies are developed not only to reduce waiting times and mitigate their impacts on patients with rheumatic conditions, but also to improve treatment effectiveness in MPTF.
在许多国家,获得多学科疼痛治疗机构(MPTF)的服务受到长时间等待的限制。然而,对于等待时间对临床结局的影响,尤其是对患有风湿性疾病的患者,人们了解不足。本研究探讨了MPTF等待时间与风湿性疾病患者临床结局之间的关联。
数据取自魁北克疼痛登记处,这是一个关于在MPTF接受服务的患者的大型数据库。使用广义估计方程检验等待时间(分为<2个月、2 - 6个月和>6个月)与从MPTF首次就诊到6个月随访期间疼痛干扰、疼痛强度和健康相关生活质量变化之间的关联。
共有3230例风湿性疾病患者(平均年龄:55.8±14.0岁;66%为女性)纳入分析。结果显示,等待时间组之间在改善程度上存在微小但显著的差异,与首次就诊前等待2 - 6个月或超过6个月的患者相比,等待时间少于2个月的患者在所有临床结局方面的改善更大(调整后的时间X组效应≤0.001)。只有等待时间少于2个月的患者在疼痛干扰(1.12/10)、疼痛强度(1.3/10)以及身体和心理健康相关生活质量(3.9和3.7/100)方面达到了具有临床意义的改善。
患者在MPTF接受服务前经历的较长等待时间与疼痛干扰、疼痛强度和健康相关生活质量在统计学上显著较小的改善相关;然而,这些差异在临床上并不显著。基于这些结果,我们建议制定策略,不仅要减少等待时间并减轻其对风湿性疾病患者的影响,还要提高MPTF的治疗效果。