• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测三级多学科疼痛治疗中心疼痛患者的治疗结果:一种疼痛轨迹方法。

Predicting treatment outcomes of pain patients attending tertiary multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: A pain trajectory approach.

作者信息

Pagé M Gabrielle, Romero Escobar E Manolo, Ware Mark A, Choinière Manon

机构信息

Centre de Recherche du Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

出版信息

Can J Pain. 2017 Aug 4;1(1):61-74. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2017.1325715. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1080/24740527.2017.1325715
PMID:35005342
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8730588/
Abstract

: Though multidisciplinary pain treatment (MPT) is considered the gold standard for managing chronic pain, it is unclear which patients benefit most from this high-cost treatment approach. : The goals were to identify subgroups of patients sharing similar pain severity trajectories over time and predictors of MPT responsiveness. : Participants were 1894 patients (mean age = 53.18 years [SD = 14.0]; female = 60.3%) enrolled in the Quebec Pain Registry with moderate to severe baseline pain severity. Patients completed validated questionnaires on pain and related constructs before initiating treatment and 6, 12, and 24 months later. : Trajectory analyses of pain severity (intensity and interference) showed that a three-class model best fit the data. Two of the trajectories, which included 24.5% of patients, showed significant improvement in pain severity levels over time (improvers). Compared to patients in the nonimproving trajectory (non-improvers), improvers were younger and more likely to suffer from neuropathic pain and had pain of shorter duration, lower worst pain intensity, lower sleep disturbances and depression scores at baseline, a lower tendency to catastrophize, and better physical health-related quality of life (QOL). This predictive model had a specificity of 96.2% and a sensitivity of 23.6%. : Only a minority of patients exhibited an improvement in their pain severity with MPT. Several patients' characteristics were significantly associated with pain trajectory membership. Early identification of nonimprovers, through examination of baseline characteristics and rates of change in pain scores, can provide valuable information about prognosis and open the doors for evaluation of different cost-effective treatment approaches. : CP = chronic pain; MPT = multidisciplinary pain treatment; QPR = Quebec Pain Registry; QOL = quality of life.

摘要

尽管多学科疼痛治疗(MPT)被认为是管理慢性疼痛的金标准,但尚不清楚哪些患者能从这种高成本治疗方法中获益最多。目标是确定随时间推移疼痛严重程度轨迹相似的患者亚组以及MPT反应性的预测因素。参与者为1894名患者(平均年龄 = 53.18岁[标准差 = 14.0];女性 = 60.3%),他们被纳入魁北克疼痛登记处,基线疼痛严重程度为中度至重度。患者在开始治疗前以及治疗后6个月、12个月和24个月完成了关于疼痛及相关结构的有效问卷。疼痛严重程度(强度和干扰)的轨迹分析表明,三类模型最适合这些数据。其中两条轨迹(包括24.5%的患者)显示随着时间推移疼痛严重程度有显著改善(改善者)。与非改善轨迹的患者(非改善者)相比,改善者更年轻,更可能患有神经性疼痛,疼痛持续时间更短,基线时最差疼痛强度更低、睡眠障碍和抑郁评分更低,灾难化倾向更低,与身体健康相关的生活质量(QOL)更好。这个预测模型的特异性为96.2%,敏感性为23.6%。只有少数患者通过MPT使疼痛严重程度得到改善。几个患者特征与疼痛轨迹类别显著相关。通过检查基线特征和疼痛评分变化率早期识别非改善者,可以提供有关预后的有价值信息,并为评估不同的成本效益治疗方法打开大门。CP = 慢性疼痛;MPT = 多学科疼痛治疗;QPR = 魁北克疼痛登记处;QOL = 生活质量

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee7c/8730588/3e84c0e0f9f5/UCJP_A_1325715_F0004_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee7c/8730588/729133067f5a/UCJP_A_1325715_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee7c/8730588/1e45e2ac86ca/UCJP_A_1325715_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee7c/8730588/c16e8a3ea686/UCJP_A_1325715_F0003_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee7c/8730588/3e84c0e0f9f5/UCJP_A_1325715_F0004_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee7c/8730588/729133067f5a/UCJP_A_1325715_F0001_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee7c/8730588/1e45e2ac86ca/UCJP_A_1325715_F0002_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee7c/8730588/c16e8a3ea686/UCJP_A_1325715_F0003_B.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ee7c/8730588/3e84c0e0f9f5/UCJP_A_1325715_F0004_B.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting treatment outcomes of pain patients attending tertiary multidisciplinary pain treatment centers: A pain trajectory approach.预测三级多学科疼痛治疗中心疼痛患者的治疗结果:一种疼痛轨迹方法。
Can J Pain. 2017 Aug 4;1(1):61-74. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2017.1325715. eCollection 2017.
2
Examination of the Course of Low Back Pain Intensity Based on Baseline Predictors and Health Care Utilization Among Patients Treated in Multidisciplinary Pain Clinics: A Quebec Pain Registry Study.基于基线预测因子和多学科疼痛诊所治疗患者的医疗保健利用情况检查腰痛强度的病程:魁北克疼痛登记研究。
Pain Med. 2019 Mar 1;20(3):564-573. doi: 10.1093/pm/pny205.
3
Trajectories of opioid consumption as predictors of patient-reported outcomes among individuals attending multidisciplinary pain treatment clinics.多学科疼痛治疗诊所就诊者的阿片类药物使用轨迹对患者报告结局的预测作用。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2024 Jan;33(1):e5706. doi: 10.1002/pds.5706. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
4
Predictors of Long-Term Opioid Effectiveness in Patients With Chronic Non-Cancer Pain Attending Multidisciplinary Pain Treatment Clinics: A Quebec Pain Registry Study.多学科疼痛治疗诊所慢性非癌性疼痛患者长期阿片类药物有效性的预测因素:魁北克疼痛登记研究。
Pain Pract. 2020 Jul;20(6):588-599. doi: 10.1111/papr.12883. Epub 2020 Apr 8.
5
Development and Implementation of a Registry of Patients Attending Multidisciplinary Pain Treatment Clinics: The Quebec Pain Registry.多学科疼痛治疗诊所就诊患者登记系统的开发与实施:魁北克疼痛登记系统
Pain Res Manag. 2017;2017:8123812. doi: 10.1155/2017/8123812. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
6
In-hospital opioid consumption, but not pain intensity scores, predicts 6-month levels of pain catastrophizing following hepatic resection: A trajectory analysis.住院期间阿片类药物的使用量而非疼痛强度评分可预测肝切除术后 6 个月的疼痛灾难化水平:轨迹分析。
Eur J Pain. 2019 Mar;23(3):503-514. doi: 10.1002/ejp.1324. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
7
Effectiveness of long-term opioid therapy among chronic non-cancer pain patients attending multidisciplinary pain treatment clinics: A Quebec Pain Registry study.多学科疼痛治疗诊所慢性非癌性疼痛患者长期阿片类药物治疗的有效性:一项魁北克疼痛登记研究。
Can J Pain. 2018 Apr 19;2(1):113-124. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2018.1451252. eCollection 2018.
8
Pre-consultation biopsychosocial data from patients admitted for management at pain centers in Norway.挪威疼痛管理中心患者入院前的生物心理社会数据。
Scand J Pain. 2020 Apr 28;20(2):363-373. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2019-0076.
9
Which Back Pain Patients Benefit From Multidisciplinary Pain Management? A Comparative Cost Analysis Using Claims Data of Statutory Health Insurance.哪些背痛患者能从多学科疼痛管理中获益?一项使用法定健康保险理赔数据的成本比较分析。
Gesundheitswesen. 2016 Sep;78(S 01):e120-e127. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-110401. Epub 2016 Jul 21.
10
Risk of Opioid Abuse and Biopsychosocial Characteristics Associated With This Risk Among Chronic Pain Patients Attending a Multidisciplinary Pain Treatment Facility.在一家多学科疼痛治疗机构就诊的慢性疼痛患者中,阿片类药物滥用风险及与此风险相关的生物心理社会特征。
Clin J Pain. 2016 Oct;32(10):859-69. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000337.

引用本文的文献

1
Factors predicting outcomes from chronic pain management interventions.预测慢性疼痛管理干预效果的因素。
BMJ Med. 2025 Jul 7;4(1):e001143. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2024-001143. eCollection 2025.
2
The Effect of Combining Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Pain Neuroscience Education in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain and High Pain Catastrophizing: An Exploratory Clinical, Cognitive, and fMRI Study.经颅直流电刺激联合疼痛神经科学教育对慢性下腰痛伴高疼痛灾难化患者的影响:一项探索性临床、认知和功能磁共振成像研究。
Brain Behav. 2025 May;15(5):e70543. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70543.
3
Pain relief and associated factors: a cross-sectional observational web-based study in a Quebec cohort of persons living with chronic pain.

本文引用的文献

1
Cut points for mild, moderate, and severe pain among cancer and non-cancer patients: a literature review.癌症患者和非癌症患者中轻度、中度和重度疼痛的切点:一项文献综述。
Ann Palliat Med. 2015 Oct;4(4):176-83. doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2224-5820.2015.09.04.
2
Ecological momentary assessment for chronic pain in fibromyalgia using a smartphone: a randomized crossover study.使用智能手机对纤维肌痛慢性疼痛进行生态瞬时评估:一项随机交叉研究。
Eur J Pain. 2014 Jul;18(6):862-72. doi: 10.1002/j.1532-2149.2013.00425.x. Epub 2013 Nov 22.
3
The association of sleep and pain: an update and a path forward.
疼痛缓解及相关因素:一项基于网络的横断面观察性研究,对象为魁北克慢性疼痛患者队列。
Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2024 Mar 15;5:1306479. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2024.1306479. eCollection 2024.
4
Co-designing a Canadian adaptation of a lifestyle-oriented intervention aimed to improve daily functioning of individuals living with chronic pain: a multi-method study protocol of REVEAL(OT) Canada.共同设计一项针对加拿大人群的、以生活方式为导向的干预措施,旨在改善慢性疼痛患者的日常功能:加拿大REVEAL(OT)研究的多方法研究方案
Front Rehabil Sci. 2023 Nov 24;4:1281680. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2023.1281680. eCollection 2023.
5
The Relationship between Pain Catastrophizing and Cognitive Function in Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain: A Scoping Review.慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者的疼痛灾难化与认知功能的关系:范围综述。
Pain Res Manag. 2023 Sep 9;2023:5851450. doi: 10.1155/2023/5851450. eCollection 2023.
6
Winner of The Ronald Melzack - Canadian Journal of Pain 2017 Paper of the Year Award/Récipiendaire du Prix Ronald Melzack Pour L'Annee 2017 Des Articles Parus Dans La Revue Canadienne De La Douleur.2017年《加拿大疼痛杂志》罗纳德·梅尔扎克年度论文奖获得者/2017年加拿大疼痛杂志罗纳德·梅尔扎克年度论文奖得主
Can J Pain. 2018 Jun 20;2(1):158-159. doi: 10.1080/24740527.2018.1483111. eCollection 2018.
7
The burden of waiting to access pain clinic services: perceptions and experiences of patients with rheumatic conditions.等待获得疼痛门诊服务的负担:风湿性疾病患者的认知与体验
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Feb 18;21(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06114-y.
8
The association between waiting time and multidisciplinary pain treatment outcomes in patients with rheumatic conditions.风湿性疾病患者等待时间与多学科疼痛治疗结果之间的关联。
BMC Rheumatol. 2020 Oct 23;4:59. doi: 10.1186/s41927-020-00157-0. eCollection 2020.
9
Defining pain and interference recovery trajectories after acute non-catastrophic musculoskeletal trauma through growth mixture modeling.通过增长混合建模定义急性非灾难性肌肉骨骼创伤后的疼痛和干扰恢复轨迹。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Sep 17;21(1):615. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03621-7.
10
Recent advances in understanding and managing phantom limb pain.幻肢痛理解与管理的最新进展
F1000Res. 2019 Jul 23;8. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.19355.1. eCollection 2019.
睡眠与疼痛的关联:最新研究及未来方向
J Pain. 2013 Dec;14(12):1539-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2013.08.007.
4
The Canadian STOP-PAIN project: the burden of chronic pain-does sex really matter?加拿大止痛项目:慢性疼痛的负担——性别真的有影响吗?
Clin J Pain. 2014 May;30(5):443-52. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182a0de5e.
5
Variability in infant acute pain responding meaningfully obscured by averaging pain responses.婴儿急性疼痛反应的变异性通过平均疼痛反应而被显著掩盖。
Pain. 2013 May;154(5):714-721. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.01.015. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
6
Pain catastrophizing: an updated review.疼痛灾难化:最新综述。
Indian J Psychol Med. 2012 Jul;34(3):204-17. doi: 10.4103/0253-7176.106012.
7
The economic costs of pain in the United States.美国疼痛的经济代价。
J Pain. 2012 Aug;13(8):715-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2012.03.009. Epub 2012 May 16.
8
Pain management in the elderly population: a review.老年人群的疼痛管理:综述
Ochsner J. 2010 Fall;10(3):179-87.
9
The Canadian STOP-PAIN project - Part 1: Who are the patients on the waitlists of multidisciplinary pain treatment facilities?加拿大 STOP-PAIN 项目 - 第 1 部分:多学科疼痛治疗机构等候名单上的患者是谁?
Can J Anaesth. 2010 Jun;57(6):539-48. doi: 10.1007/s12630-010-9305-5.
10
Sex, gender, and pain: a review of recent clinical and experimental findings.性别、社会性别与疼痛:近期临床及实验研究结果综述
J Pain. 2009 May;10(5):447-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2008.12.001.