School of Journalism and Mass Communication, UW-Madison , Madison, WI, USA.
Department of Radiology, UW-Madison , Madison, WI, USA.
J Health Commun. 2020 Sep 1;25(9):681-691. doi: 10.1080/10810730.2020.1838003. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
The study examines whether physicians' framing of clinical interactions is related to patient shared decision-making (SDM) satisfaction when using a clinical decision support tool (CDST) concerning mammographic screening. To answer this question, we combined (a) system log data from a CDST, (b) content coding of the physicians' message framing while using the CDST, and (c) a post-visit patient survey to assess SDM satisfaction concerning screening mammography. Results suggest that two types of message frames - consequence frames and numerical frames - moderated the relationship of the CDST on SDM satisfaction. When the CDST displayed low risk of breast cancer for a patient, physicians were able to improve the cognitive aspects of SDM satisfaction by framing the consequences of mammography screening in positive terms. However, when the physician delivered the numerical information in relative, rather than absolute terms, the patient's SDM satisfaction was reduced. Our study advances previous message framing effect research in health communication from experimental settings to clinical encounters. It also discusses the importance of delivering risk-congruent frames in clinical settings.
本研究考察了在使用临床决策支持工具(CDST)进行乳腺 X 光筛查时,医生对临床互动的表述方式是否与患者的共享决策(SDM)满意度有关。为了回答这个问题,我们结合了(a)CDST 的系统日志数据,(b)医生在使用 CDST 时的信息框架内容编码,以及(c)一项用于评估筛查性乳腺 X 光检查的 SDM 满意度的就诊后患者调查。结果表明,两种信息框架——后果框架和数值框架——调节了 CDST 对 SDM 满意度的关系。当 CDST 显示患者患乳腺癌的风险较低时,医生可以通过积极地描述乳腺 X 光筛查的后果来提高 SDM 满意度的认知方面。然而,当医生以相对而不是绝对的方式传达数值信息时,患者的 SDM 满意度会降低。本研究将健康传播中的先前信息框架效应研究从实验环境推进到临床环境,并讨论了在临床环境中提供风险一致框架的重要性。