• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

DOI:10.3310/hsdr08390
PMID:33112533
Abstract

BACKGROUND

No seizure first aid training intervention exists for people with epilepsy who regularly attend emergency departments and their significant others, despite such an intervention’s potential to reduce clinically unnecessary and costly visits.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to (1) develop Seizure first Aid training For Epilepsy (SAFE) by adapting a broader intervention and (2) determine the feasibility and optimal design of a definitive randomised controlled trial to test SAFE’s efficacy.

DESIGN

The study involved (1) the development of an intervention informed by a co-design approach with qualitative feedback and (2) a pilot randomised controlled trial with follow-ups at 3, 6 and 12 months and assessments of treatment fidelity and the cost of SAFE’s delivery.

SETTING

The setting was (1) third-sector patient support groups and professional health-care organisations and (2) three NHS emergency departments in England.

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were (1) people with epilepsy who had visited emergency departments in the prior 2 years, their significant others and emergency department, paramedic, general practice, commissioning, neurology and nursing representatives and (2) people with epilepsy aged ≥ 16 years who had been diagnosed for ≥ 1 year and who had made two or more emergency department visits in the prior 12 months, and one of their significant others. Emergency departments identified ostensibly eligible people with epilepsy from attendance records and patients confirmed their eligibility.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants in the pilot randomised controlled trial were randomly allocated 1 : 1 to SAFE plus treatment as usual or to treatment as usual only.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Consent rate and availability of routine data on emergency department use at 12 months were the main outcome measures. Other measures of interest included eligibility rate, ease with which people with epilepsy could be identified and routine data secured, availability of self-reported emergency department data, self-reported emergency department data’s comparability with routine data, SAFE’s effect on emergency department use, and emergency department use in the treatment as usual arm, which could be used in sample size calculations.

RESULTS

(1) Nine health-care professionals and 23 service users provided feedback that generated an intervention considered to be NHS feasible and well positioned to achieve its purpose. (2) The consent rate was 12.5%, with 53 people with epilepsy and 38 significant others recruited. The eligibility rate was 10.6%. Identifying people with epilepsy from attendance records was resource intensive for emergency department staff. Those recruited felt more stigmatised because of epilepsy than the wider epilepsy population. Routine data on emergency department use at 12 months were secured for 94.1% of people with epilepsy, but the application process took 8.5 months. Self-reported emergency department data were available for 66.7% of people with epilepsy, and people with epilepsy self-reported more emergency department visits than were captured in routine data. Most participants (76.9%) randomised to SAFE received the intervention. The intervention was delivered with high fidelity. No related serious adverse events occurred. Emergency department use at 12 months was lower in the SAFE plus treatment as usual arm than in the treatment as usual only arm, but not significantly so. Calculations indicated that a definitive trial would need ≈ 674 people with epilepsy and ≈ 39 emergency department sites.

LIMITATIONS

Contrary to patient statements on recruitment, routine data secured at the pilot trial’s end indicated that ≈ 40% may not have satisfied the inclusion criterion of two or more emergency department visits.

CONCLUSIONS

An intervention was successfully developed, a pilot randomised controlled trial conducted and outcome data secured for most participants. The consent rate did not satisfy a predetermined ‘stop/go’ level of ≥ 20%. The time that emergency department staff needed to identify eligible people with epilepsy is unlikely to be replicable. A definitive trial is currently not feasible.

FUTURE WORK

Research to more easily identify and recruit people from the target population is required.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN13871327.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in ; Vol. 8, No. 39. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

摘要

相似文献

1
2
Seizure First Aid Training For people with Epilepsy (SAFE) frequently attending emergency departments and their significant others: results of a UK multi-centre randomised controlled pilot trial.癫痫患者癫痫发作急救培训(SAFE):经常就诊于急诊科的癫痫患者及其重要他人:一项英国多中心随机对照试点试验的结果。
BMJ Open. 2020 Apr 16;10(4):e035516. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035516.
3
Health screening clinic to reduce absenteeism and presenteeism among NHS Staff: eTHOS a pilot RCT.健康筛查门诊减少 NHS 员工旷工和出勤主义:eTHOS 一项试点 RCT。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(23):1-105. doi: 10.3310/KDST3869.
4
Interpersonal counselling for adolescent depression delivered by youth mental health workers without core professional training: the ICALM feasibility RCT.由未经核心专业培训的青年心理健康工作者提供的青少年抑郁症人际咨询:ICALM可行性随机对照试验
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Dec;12(48):1-121. doi: 10.3310/GTRV6410.
5
Developing feasible person-centred care alternatives to emergency department responses for adults with epilepsy: a discrete choice analysis mixed-methods study.为癫痫成人制定可行的以患者为中心的护理替代急诊治疗方案:一项离散选择分析混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(24):1-158. doi: 10.3310/HKQW4129.
6
Carer administration of as-needed subcutaneous medication for breakthrough symptoms in people dying at home: the CARiAD feasibility RCT.居家临终患者按需皮下注射治疗突破性症状的照护者管理:CARiAD 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 May;24(25):1-150. doi: 10.3310/hta24250.
7
Guided self-help for depression in autistic adults: the ADEPT feasibility RCT.孤独症成人抑郁的引导自助:ADEPT 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Dec;23(68):1-94. doi: 10.3310/hta23680.
8
An intervention to promote self-management, independence and self-efficacy in people with early-stage dementia: the Journeying through Dementia RCT.促进早期痴呆症患者自我管理、独立和自我效能感的干预措施:Journeying through Dementia RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 May;26(24):1-152. doi: 10.3310/KHHA0861.
9
10
Sexual health promotion in people with severe mental illness: the RESPECT feasibility RCT.严重精神疾病患者的性健康促进:尊重可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Dec;23(65):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta23650.