Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, PR China.
Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Acta Radiol. 2021 Dec;62(12):1674-1678. doi: 10.1177/0284185120969952. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
When antegrade ureteral intervention fails due to severe ureteral stricture or tortuosity, a longer sheath can be used to facilitate ureteral catheterization.
To evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the use of a long sheath in antegrade ureteral stent placement after failure of antegrade ureteral stent placement using a short sheath.
Among 1284 procedures in 934 patients who received ureteral stent placement, a long sheath was used after stricture negotiation failure using a short sheath in 57 (4.4%) procedures in 53 patients. The data of these 53 patients were retrospectively reviewed.
The most common reasons for long sheath use were failure of balloon catheter (59.6%) or guidewire (29.8%) advancement across the stricture. Technical success, successful stricture negotiation after using a long sheath, was achieved in 50/57 (87.7%) procedures. In two of seven failed procedures, an additional TIPS sheath was used and the technical success rate improved to 91.2% (52/57). The technical success rate was significantly higher in the patients who have failed balloon catheter advancement (97.1%, 33/34) than the patients who have failed guidewire advancement (64.7%, 11/17) (Fisher's exact test, = 0.004). Self-limiting hematoma occurred in one patient after use of the long sheath and was considered a minor complication.
Ureteral catheterization using a long sheath is feasible and effective when antegrade ureteral intervention using a short sheath fails. When using a long sheath, the technical success rate was higher when advancing the balloon catheter over the guidewire than when advancing the guidewire through tight stricture.
当由于严重的输尿管狭窄或迂曲导致顺行输尿管介入失败时,可以使用较长的鞘管来辅助输尿管导管插入。
评估在使用短鞘管进行顺行输尿管支架置入术失败后,使用长鞘管进行顺行输尿管支架置入的可行性和有效性。
在 934 例接受输尿管支架置入术的患者中,1284 例中,53 例(4.4%)在使用短鞘管进行狭窄扩张失败后使用了长鞘管。回顾性分析这 53 例患者的数据。
最常见的使用长鞘管的原因是球囊导管(59.6%)或导丝(29.8%)无法通过狭窄部位推进。57 例中有 50 例(87.7%)成功使用长鞘管实现技术上的成功,即成功通过狭窄部位。在 7 例失败的病例中,有 2 例额外使用了 TIPS 鞘管,技术成功率提高到 91.2%(52/57)。与导丝推进失败的患者(64.7%,11/17)相比,球囊导管推进失败的患者(97.1%,33/34)的技术成功率显著更高(Fisher 精确检验,=0.004)。1 例患者在使用长鞘管后出现自限性血肿,被认为是轻微并发症。
当使用短鞘管进行顺行输尿管介入失败时,使用长鞘管进行输尿管导管插入是可行且有效的。使用长鞘管时,球囊导管越过导丝推进的技术成功率高于导丝通过紧密狭窄部位推进的技术成功率。