Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills.
作者信息
Hackett Rachel, Kelly Steven
机构信息
The Company of Biologists, Bidder Building, Station Road, Cambridge CB24 9LF, UK
Department of Plant Sciences, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3RB, UK
出版信息
Biol Open. 2020 Oct 28;9(10):bio056556. doi: 10.1242/bio.056556.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Publishing ethics in the era of paper mills.学术造假时代的出版伦理
Biol Open. 2020 Oct 28;9(10):bio056556. doi: 10.1242/bio.056556.
2
Ethical guidelines to publication of chemical research.化学研究成果发表的伦理准则。
J Med Chem. 2004 Jan 1;47(1):17A-19A.
3
Scientific honesty and publicly shared lab notebooks: Sharing lab notebooks along with publication would increase transparency and help to improve honesty when reporting results.科学诚信与公开共享的实验室笔记本：发表论文时同时公开实验室笔记本，将提高透明度，并有助于提高报告结果时的诚信度。
EMBO Rep. 2018 Oct;19(10). doi: 10.15252/embr.201846866. Epub 2018 Aug 29.
4
Publication of chemical research: do we need ethical standards?化学研究成果的发表：我们需要道德标准吗？
Anal Bioanal Chem. 2007 Jan;387(1):129-30. doi: 10.1007/s00216-006-0920-5.
5
Publication ethics.出版伦理
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun;65(6):429-432. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_483_17.
6
Consensus statement on the adoption of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines.关于采用出版伦理委员会（COPE）指南的共识声明。
J Surg Educ. 2010 Jul-Aug;67(4):274. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.06.011.
7
Editorial: conflict of interest and FAI.社论：利益冲突与股髋臼撞击症
Foot Ankle Int. 2011 May;32(5):S455-6. doi: 10.3113/FAI.2011.0455.
8
Spin cycle.脱水甩干程序
Nature. 2014 Dec 18;516(7531):287-8. doi: 10.1038/516287b.
9
Chinese and Iranian Scientific Publications: Fast Growth and Poor Ethics.中国和伊朗的科学出版物：快速增长与糟糕的道德规范。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):317-319. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9766-1. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
10
Publication ethics.出版伦理
Maturitas. 2012 Mar;71(3):199. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.01.003. Epub 2012 Jan 26.
引用本文的文献
1
How to fight fake papers: a review on important information sources and steps towards solution of the problem.如何打击假论文：重要信息来源及解决问题步骤综述。
Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2024 Dec;397(12):9281-9294. doi: 10.1007/s00210-024-03272-8. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
2
Valuing peer review at Disease Models & Mechanisms.重视《疾病模型与机制》的同行评审。
Dis Model Mech. 2024 Jan 1;17(1). doi: 10.1242/dmm.050717. Epub 2024 Jan 30.
3
Protection of the human gene research literature from contract cheating organizations known as research paper mills.保护人类基因研究文献免受被称为论文工厂的合同作弊组织的侵害。
Nucleic Acids Res. 2022 Nov 28;50(21):12058-12070. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkac1139.
4
The continuing challenge of paper-mills to publishing in the biological sciences.造纸厂对生物科学出版业持续构成的挑战。
Biol Open. 2022 Jun 15;11(6). doi: 10.1242/bio.059428. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
5
Ten years (and counting) of Biology Open.《生物学开放》创刊十年（且仍在持续）。
Biol Open. 2022 May 15;11(5). doi: 10.1242/bio.059370. Epub 2022 Jun 6.
6
Identification of human gene research articles with wrongly identified nucleotide sequences.鉴定核苷酸序列错误识别的人类基因研究文章。
Life Sci Alliance. 2022 Jan 12;5(4). doi: 10.26508/lsa.202101203. Print 2022 Apr.
7
Scientific authorship: a primer for researchers.科学论文署名：科研人员入门指南。
Reumatologia. 2020;58(6):345-349. doi: 10.5114/reum.2020.101999. Epub 2020 Dec 23.
本文引用的文献
1
Digital magic, or the dark arts of the 21 century-how can journals and peer reviewers detect manuscripts and publications from paper mills?数字魔法，或 21 世纪的黑暗艺术——期刊和同行评审人员如何发现来自论文工厂的稿件和出版物？
FEBS Lett. 2020 Feb;594(4):583-589. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13747. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
The Prevalence of Inappropriate Image Duplication in Biomedical Research Publications.生物医学研究出版物中不当图像重复的发生率
mBio. 2016 Jun 7;7(3):e00809-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00809-16.
3
Passing the test.通过测试。
Biol Open. 2013 Oct 30;2(11):1091-2. doi: 10.1242/bio.20136940. eCollection 2013.
4
Who's afraid of peer review?谁害怕同行评审？
Science. 2013 Oct 4;342(6154):60-5. doi: 10.1126/science.2013.342.6154.342_60.
Zotero 插件