Wieder Robert, Carson Jeffrey L, Strom Brian L
Department of Medicine, New Jersey Medical School, Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences, Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA.
J Healthc Leadersh. 2020 Oct 14;12:103-115. doi: 10.2147/JHL.S262351. eCollection 2020.
We report faculty affairs lessons from the formation and academic restructuring of Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences. Our approach may be a blueprint for development of a new track system that can be adapted by other institutions, after consideration of their own special circumstances.
We created new Appointments and Promotions guidelines consisting of one Tenure Track and four Non-Tenure Tracks, each with different missions. We restructured faculty performance evaluations to include mission-based criteria, an expanded rating scale, and specific expectations. After negotiating these new processes with our faculty union, we enacted central oversight to ensure uniform application of these processes and their associated criteria. We communicated the guidelines and the evaluation system widely. We created programs for universal mentoring, publishing education, diversity, and faculty development.
All faculty in our seven schools went through track selection. Anxiety and incomplete understanding improved after implementation. Evaluations with expectations for the following year and an expanded scale for more nuanced assessment served as mentoring tools. Requirements for mentor assignments and diversity education created an atmosphere of nurturing and inclusion. Publications, extramural support, and faculty satisfaction increased after implementation of the guidelines.
Lessons included the need to review and learn from guidelines at other institutions, to create tracks that align with different jobs, the necessity for central oversight for uniform application of criteria, the need for extensive and frequent communication with faculty, and that fear of change is only reduced after evidence of success of a new structure. The most important lesson was that faculty rise to expectations when clear, ambitious criteria are delineated and universally applied.
我们报告了罗格斯生物医学与健康科学学院组建及学术重组过程中的教师事务经验教训。我们的方法可能为开发一种新的轨道系统提供蓝图,其他机构在考虑自身特殊情况后可对其进行调整。
我们制定了新的任用和晋升指南,包括一个终身教职轨道和四个非终身教职轨道,每个轨道都有不同的使命。我们对教师绩效评估进行了重组,以纳入基于使命的标准、扩展的评级量表和具体期望。在与教师工会就这些新流程进行谈判后,我们实施了中央监督,以确保这些流程及其相关标准的统一应用。我们广泛宣传了这些指南和评估系统。我们创建了通用指导、出版教育、多元化和教师发展项目。
我们七所学校的所有教师都经历了轨道选择。实施后,焦虑情绪和理解不完整的情况有所改善。对下一年有期望且有更细致评估的扩展量表的评估可作为指导工具。对导师分配和多元化教育的要求营造了一种培养和包容的氛围。指南实施后,出版物、校外支持和教师满意度都有所提高。
经验教训包括需要参考其他机构的指南并从中学习,创建与不同工作相匹配的轨道,中央监督对标准统一应用的必要性,与教师进行广泛且频繁沟通的必要性,以及只有在新结构成功的证据出现后,对变革的恐惧才会减轻。最重要的经验教训是,当明确、雄心勃勃的标准被划定并普遍应用时,教师会达到期望。