Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA.
J Dent Educ. 2013 Jun;77(6):706-15.
The promotion and tenure process for faculty members varies, by design, for different disciplines, departments, and academic institutions. For many faculty members in U.S. dental schools, the process may thus appear nebulous and be difficult to navigate. In this article, we review the history, forces of change, and some of the mechanisms utilized for promotion and tenure of faculty in the health sciences, particularly for clinician-educators. Some institutions have successfully created hybrid tracks for clinician-educators in order to develop and recognize these faculty members' scholarly activity in addition to their clinical teaching. Hybrid tracks empower faculty members to successfully perform scholarly activities that realistically reflect institutional missions. The authors of this article conclude with a number of practical suggestions to enhance development and retention of faculty using the hybrid promotion and tenure mechanism. These include demonstrating the congruence of institutional mission, faculty activities, and promotion and tenure guidelines; developing scholarly activities for clinician-educators that can be measured in the promotion and tenure process; rewarding scholarly achievement for clinician-educators utilizing the promotion and tenure mechanism; and developing an evaluation system that accounts for changes in mission and faculty activities.
教师的晋升和终身教职的评审过程因学科、部门和学术机构的不同而有所差异。对于美国牙科学院的许多教师来说,这个过程可能看起来很模糊,难以驾驭。在本文中,我们回顾了卫生科学领域(特别是临床教育家)教师晋升和终身教职评审的历史、变革动力以及一些使用的机制。一些机构已经成功地为临床教育家创建了混合轨道,以发展和认可这些教师的学术活动以及他们的临床教学。混合轨道使教师能够成功地开展学术活动,这些活动真实地反映了机构的使命。本文的作者还提出了一些实际建议,以利用混合晋升和终身教职机制来促进和保留教师。这些建议包括展示机构使命、教师活动和晋升和终身教职准则的一致性;为临床教育家制定可在晋升和终身教职过程中衡量的学术活动;利用晋升和终身教职机制奖励临床教育家的学术成就;以及制定一个考虑到使命和教师活动变化的评估系统。