• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用个体化风险分层策略预测心力衰竭事件恶化和全因死亡率。

Prediction of worsening heart failure events and all-cause mortality using an individualized risk stratification strategy.

作者信息

Zile Michael R, Koehler Jodi, Sarkar Shantanu, Butler Javed

机构信息

Medical University of South Carolina and the Ralph H. Johnson Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Charleston, SC, USA.

Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Dec;7(6):4277-4289. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13077. Epub 2020 Oct 28.

DOI:10.1002/ehf2.13077
PMID:33118331
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7754961/
Abstract

AIMS

This study aimed to examine the clinical utility of a multisensor, remote, ambulatory diagnostic risk score, TriageHF™, in a real-world, unselected, large patient sample to predict heart failure events (HFEs) and all-cause mortality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

TriageHF risk score was calculated in patients in the Optum database who had Medtronic implantable cardiac defibrillator device from 2007 to 2016. Patients were categorized into three risk groups based on probability for having an HFE within 6 months (low risk <5.4%, medium risk ≥5.4 < 20%, and high risk ≥20%). Data were analysed using three strategies: (i) scheduled monthly data download; (ii) alert-triggered data download; and (iii) daily data download. Study population consisted of 22 901 patients followed for 1.8 ± 1.3 years. Using monthly downloads, HFE risk over 30 days incrementally increased across risk categories (odds ratio: 2.8, 95% confidence interval: 2.5-3.2 for HFE, P < 0.001, low vs. medium risk, and odds ratio: 9.2, 95% confidence interval: 8.1-10.3, P < 0.001, medium vs. high risk). Findings were similar using the other two analytic strategies. Using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, sensitivity for predicting HFE over 30 days using high-risk score was 47% (alert triggered) and 51% (daily download) vs. 0.5 per patient year unexplained detection rate. TriageHF risk score also predicted all-cause mortality risk over 4 years. All-cause mortality risk was 14% in low risk, 20% in medium risk, and 38% in high risk.

CONCLUSIONS

TriageHF risk score provides a multisensor remote, ambulatory diagnostic method that predicts both HFEs and all-cause mortality.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在检验一种多传感器、远程、动态诊断风险评分系统TriageHF™在真实世界、未经过筛选的大型患者样本中预测心力衰竭事件(HFEs)和全因死亡率的临床实用性。

方法与结果

对2007年至2016年在Optum数据库中植入美敦力植入式心脏除颤器的患者计算TriageHF风险评分。根据6个月内发生HFE的概率将患者分为三个风险组(低风险<5.4%,中风险≥5.4%<20%,高风险≥20%)。使用三种策略分析数据:(i)每月定期下载数据;(ii)警报触发数据下载;(iii)每日数据下载。研究人群包括22901名患者,随访时间为1.8±1.3年。使用每月下载的数据,30天内HFE风险在各风险类别中逐渐增加(优势比:2.8,95%置信区间:2.5 - 3.2用于HFE,P<0.001,低风险与中风险相比;优势比:9.2,95%置信区间:8.1 - 10.3,P<0.001)。使用其他两种分析策略的结果相似。使用受试者工作特征曲线分析,使用高风险评分预测30天内HFE的敏感性在警报触发时为47%,每日下载时为51%,而每位患者每年无法解释的检测率为0.5。TriageHF风险评分还预测了4年内的全因死亡风险。低风险组全因死亡风险为14%,中风险组为20%,高风险组为38%。

结论

TriageHF风险评分提供了一种多传感器远程动态诊断方法,可预测HFEs和全因死亡率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db7/7754961/a4af97ca8476/EHF2-7-4277-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db7/7754961/ad7e039312c3/EHF2-7-4277-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db7/7754961/fb7f8a97324d/EHF2-7-4277-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db7/7754961/c9c2e3d4b162/EHF2-7-4277-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db7/7754961/d65c5055f0de/EHF2-7-4277-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db7/7754961/8785576dd19c/EHF2-7-4277-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db7/7754961/f7c3a9b6ca9c/EHF2-7-4277-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db7/7754961/a4af97ca8476/EHF2-7-4277-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db7/7754961/ad7e039312c3/EHF2-7-4277-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db7/7754961/fb7f8a97324d/EHF2-7-4277-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db7/7754961/c9c2e3d4b162/EHF2-7-4277-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db7/7754961/d65c5055f0de/EHF2-7-4277-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db7/7754961/8785576dd19c/EHF2-7-4277-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db7/7754961/f7c3a9b6ca9c/EHF2-7-4277-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3db7/7754961/a4af97ca8476/EHF2-7-4277-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Prediction of worsening heart failure events and all-cause mortality using an individualized risk stratification strategy.使用个体化风险分层策略预测心力衰竭事件恶化和全因死亡率。
ESC Heart Fail. 2020 Dec;7(6):4277-4289. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13077. Epub 2020 Oct 28.
2
Prediction of heart failure events based on physiologic sensor data in HINODE defibrillator patients.基于 HINODE 除颤器患者生理传感器数据预测心力衰竭事件。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Oct;11(5):3322-3331. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14890. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
3
Association of a device-based remote management heart failure pathway with outcomes: TriageHF Plus real-world evaluation.基于设备的远程管理心力衰竭路径与结局的关联:TriageHF Plus 真实世界评估。
ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Oct;11(5):2637-2647. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14821. Epub 2024 May 7.
4
A Multisensor Algorithm Predicts Heart Failure Events in Patients With Implanted Devices: Results From the MultiSENSE Study.多传感器算法预测植入设备患者的心力衰竭事件:MultiSENSE 研究结果。
JACC Heart Fail. 2017 Mar;5(3):216-225. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2016.12.011.
5
Ambulatory Risk Stratification for Worsening Heart Failure in Patients with Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction Using Diagnostic Parameters Available in Implantable Cardiac Monitors.使用植入式心脏监测器中可用的诊断参数对射血分数降低和保留的心力衰竭患者进行门诊风险分层,以评估心力衰竭恶化情况
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Apr 5;14(7):771. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14070771.
6
INTERVENE-HF: feasibility study of individualized, risk stratification-based, medication intervention in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.INTERVENE-HF:射血分数降低的心力衰竭患者基于风险分层的个体化药物干预可行性研究。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Apr;8(2):849-860. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13231. Epub 2021 Feb 1.
7
Reduction of the risk of recurring heart failure events with cardiac resynchronization therapy: MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy).心脏再同步治疗降低心力衰竭复发事件风险:MADIT-CRT(心脏再同步治疗的多中心自动除颤器植入试验)。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Aug 9;58(7):729-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.04.024.
8
Clinical risk profile score predicts all cause mortality but not implantable cardioverter defibrillator intervention rate in a large unselected cohort of patients with congestive heart failure.临床风险概况评分可预测充血性心力衰竭患者大型非选择性队列中的全因死亡率,但不能预测植入式心律转复除颤器的干预率。
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2017 May;22(3). doi: 10.1111/anec.12414. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
9
Prospective evaluation of the multisensor HeartLogic algorithm for heart failure monitoring.多传感器 HeartLogic 算法用于心力衰竭监测的前瞻性评估。
Clin Cardiol. 2020 Jul;43(7):691-697. doi: 10.1002/clc.23366. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
10
Applicability of a risk score for prediction of the long-term benefit of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients receiving cardiac resynchronization therapy.用于预测接受心脏再同步治疗的患者中植入式心脏复律除颤器的长期获益的风险评分的适用性。
Europace. 2016 Aug;18(8):1187-93. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv352. Epub 2015 Nov 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of Multisensor CIED-based Heart Failure Monitoring on Mortality, Heart Failure Hospitalizations and Outpatient Visits: A Systematic Review.基于多传感器心脏植入电子设备的心力衰竭监测对死亡率、心力衰竭住院率和门诊就诊率的影响:一项系统评价
Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2025 Jul 1;22(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s11897-025-00707-y.
2
Comparative Diagnostic Efficacy of HeartLogic and TriageHF Algorithms in Remote Monitoring of Heart Failure: A Cohort Study.HeartLogic与TriageHF算法在心力衰竭远程监测中的比较诊断效能:一项队列研究
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025 May 31;12(6):209. doi: 10.3390/jcdd12060209.
3
Continuous risk monitoring and management of heart failure: Rationale and design of the ALLEVIATE-HF trial.
心力衰竭的持续风险监测与管理:ALLEVIATE-HF试验的基本原理与设计
Eur J Heart Fail. 2025 Apr;27(4):697-706. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3595. Epub 2025 Jan 27.
4
Personalized Intervention Strategy Based on a Risk Score Generated From Subcutaneous Insertable Cardiac Monitor: Results From Phase 1 of ALLEVIATE-HF.基于皮下植入式心脏监测器生成的风险评分的个性化干预策略:ALLEVIATE-HF 第 1 阶段的结果。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Oct 15;13(20):e035501. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.035501. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
5
Dynamic risk stratification of worsening heart failure using a deep learning-enabled implanted ambulatory single-lead electrocardiogram.使用具备深度学习功能的植入式动态单导联心电图对心力衰竭恶化进行动态风险分层。
Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024 May 8;5(4):435-443. doi: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae035. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
Temporal Association Between Atrial Fibrillation Burden in Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices and the Risk of Heart Failure Hospitalization.心脏植入式电子设备中房颤负担与心力衰竭住院风险的时间关联。
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2024 Aug;17(8):e012842. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.124.012842. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
7
Efficacy of the Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Multisensory Triage-HF Algorithm in Heart Failure Care: A Real-World Clinical Experience.心脏植入式电子设备多感觉分诊-HF 算法在心力衰竭治疗中的疗效:真实世界的临床经验。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Jun 5;24(11):3664. doi: 10.3390/s24113664.
8
Clinical Predictive Modeling of Heart Failure: Domain Description, Models' Characteristics and Literature Review.心力衰竭的临床预测建模:领域描述、模型特征及文献综述
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Feb 17;14(4):443. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14040443.
9
Clinical Pathways Guided by Remotely Monitoring Cardiac Device Data: The Future of Device Heart Failure Management?由远程监测心脏设备数据引导的临床路径:设备心力衰竭管理的未来?
Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev. 2023 Apr 24;12:e15. doi: 10.15420/aer.2022.13. eCollection 2023.
10
Digital Health Technologies for Post-Discharge Care after Heart Failure Hospitalisation to Relieve Symptoms and Improve Clinical Outcomes.用于心力衰竭住院后出院护理以缓解症状并改善临床结局的数字健康技术。
J Clin Med. 2023 Mar 19;12(6):2373. doi: 10.3390/jcm12062373.