Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.
Cancer. 2021 Mar 1;127(5):777-786. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33270. Epub 2020 Oct 29.
The addition of chemotherapy to a programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor is a more effective option as a first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It might also inhibit an overactive immune response and thereby reduce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This meta-analysis assessed the rate of irAEs with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy (I+C) versus a PD-(L)1 inhibitor alone (I) and evaluated the indirect relative risk (RR) of I+C versus I.
The protocol of this study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020139923). The pooled rates of irAEs at different grades were calculated by a single-arm meta-analysis weighted by sample size, and RRs were determined by direct meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison.
Overall, I+C had a lower rate of grade 3 or higher irAEs than I (7.1% vs 10.6%; indirect RR, 0.516; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.291-0.916), although irAEs of any grade were similar. The rate of pneumonitis with I+C was lower than the rate with I for any grade (5.9% vs 7.1%; indirect RR, 0.217; 95% CI, 0.080-0.588) and for grade 3 or higher. In the endocrine system, I+C was associated with a lower overall ratein comparison with I (16.1% vs 20.1%; indirect RR, 0.260; 95% CI, 0.120-0.564), whereas irAEs of the digestive system were similar with I+C and I. In other systems, I+C decreased the rate of skin reactions, including rash, in comparison with I (10.4% vs 12.9%; indirect RR, 0.474; 95% CI, 0.299-0.751). The rate of grade 3 or higher skin reactions (excluding rash) also decreased with I+C versus I (1.1% vs 2.0%) with an indirect RR of 0.158 (95% CI, 0.032-0.765), whereas other included irAEs were similar.
In comparison with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor alone, a combination with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of NSCLC decreased the rates of most irAEs, such as pneumonitis and endocrine and skin reactions, and the overall rate.
In the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the addition of chemotherapy to a programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-(L)1) inhibitor is a more effective option. Adding chemotherapy might reduce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Thus, this article assesses the rate of irAEs with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy (I+C) in comparison with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor alone (I) and evaluates the indirect relative risk (RR) with I+C versus I. The key finding is that in comparison with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor alone, a combination with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of NSCLC decreases the rates of most irAEs, such as pneumonitis and endocrine and skin reactions, and the overall rate.
与单独使用程序性死亡受体 1/程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)抑制剂相比,化疗联合 PD-(L)1 抑制剂(I+C)作为晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一线治疗方案更为有效。它还可能抑制过度活跃的免疫反应,从而减少免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)。这项荟萃分析评估了 PD-(L)1 抑制剂联合化疗(I+C)与单独使用 PD-(L)1 抑制剂(I)相比发生 irAEs 的比率,并评估了 I+C 与 I 之间的间接相对风险(RR)。
本研究的方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42020139923)中注册。通过按样本量加权的单臂荟萃分析计算不同等级的 irAEs 的汇总发生率,并通过直接荟萃分析和间接治疗比较确定 RR。
总体而言,I+C 发生 3 级或更高 irAEs 的比率低于 I(7.1% vs 10.6%;间接 RR,0.516;95%置信区间 [CI],0.291-0.916),尽管任何等级的 irAEs 均相似。I+C 治疗的肺炎发生率低于 I 治疗的任何等级(5.9% vs 7.1%;间接 RR,0.217;95%CI,0.080-0.588)和 3 级或更高。在内分泌系统中,与 I 相比,I+C 总体发生率较低(16.1% vs 20.1%;间接 RR,0.260;95%CI,0.120-0.564),而消化系统的 irAEs 与 I+C 和 I 相似。在其他系统中,与 I 相比,I+C 降低了皮疹等皮肤反应的发生率(10.4% vs 12.9%;间接 RR,0.474;95%CI,0.299-0.751)。与 I 相比,I+C 也降低了 3 级或更高皮肤反应(不包括皮疹)的发生率(1.1% vs 2.0%),间接 RR 为 0.158(95%CI,0.032-0.765),而其他包括的 irAEs 则相似。
与单独使用 PD-L1 抑制剂相比,化疗联合 PD-(L)1 抑制剂作为 NSCLC 的一线治疗可降低大多数 irAEs(如肺炎、内分泌和皮肤反应)以及总体发生率。
在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一线治疗中,与单独使用程序性死亡受体 1/程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)抑制剂相比,化疗联合 PD-(L)1 抑制剂(I+C)是一种更有效的选择。添加化疗可能会降低免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)的发生率。因此,本文评估了 PD-(L)1 抑制剂联合化疗(I+C)与单独使用 PD-(L)1 抑制剂(I)相比发生 irAEs 的比率,并评估了 I+C 与 I 之间的间接相对风险(RR)。关键发现是,与单独使用 PD-(L)1 抑制剂相比,化疗联合 PD-(L)1 抑制剂(I+C)作为 NSCLC 的一线治疗方案可降低大多数 irAEs(如肺炎、内分泌和皮肤反应)以及总体发生率。