Suppr超能文献

PD-L1 抑制剂联合化疗与 PD-L1 抑制剂单药一线治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的免疫相关不良反应:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Immune-related adverse events of a PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy versus a PD-L1 inhibitor alone in first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized control trials.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery and Oncology, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou, China.

出版信息

Cancer. 2021 Mar 1;127(5):777-786. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33270. Epub 2020 Oct 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The addition of chemotherapy to a programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor is a more effective option as a first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It might also inhibit an overactive immune response and thereby reduce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). This meta-analysis assessed the rate of irAEs with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy (I+C) versus a PD-(L)1 inhibitor alone (I) and evaluated the indirect relative risk (RR) of I+C versus I.

METHODS

The protocol of this study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020139923). The pooled rates of irAEs at different grades were calculated by a single-arm meta-analysis weighted by sample size, and RRs were determined by direct meta-analysis and indirect treatment comparison.

RESULTS

Overall, I+C had a lower rate of grade 3 or higher irAEs than I (7.1% vs 10.6%; indirect RR, 0.516; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.291-0.916), although irAEs of any grade were similar. The rate of pneumonitis with I+C was lower than the rate with I for any grade (5.9% vs 7.1%; indirect RR, 0.217; 95% CI, 0.080-0.588) and for grade 3 or higher. In the endocrine system, I+C was associated with a lower overall ratein comparison with I (16.1% vs 20.1%; indirect RR, 0.260; 95% CI, 0.120-0.564), whereas irAEs of the digestive system were similar with I+C and I. In other systems, I+C decreased the rate of skin reactions, including rash, in comparison with I (10.4% vs 12.9%; indirect RR, 0.474; 95% CI, 0.299-0.751). The rate of grade 3 or higher skin reactions (excluding rash) also decreased with I+C versus I (1.1% vs 2.0%) with an indirect RR of 0.158 (95% CI, 0.032-0.765), whereas other included irAEs were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor alone, a combination with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of NSCLC decreased the rates of most irAEs, such as pneumonitis and endocrine and skin reactions, and the overall rate.

LAY SUMMARY

In the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the addition of chemotherapy to a programmed death 1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-(L)1) inhibitor is a more effective option. Adding chemotherapy might reduce immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Thus, this article assesses the rate of irAEs with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy (I+C) in comparison with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor alone (I) and evaluates the indirect relative risk (RR) with I+C versus I. The key finding is that in comparison with a PD-(L)1 inhibitor alone, a combination with chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of NSCLC decreases the rates of most irAEs, such as pneumonitis and endocrine and skin reactions, and the overall rate.

摘要

背景

与单独使用程序性死亡受体 1/程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)抑制剂相比,化疗联合 PD-(L)1 抑制剂(I+C)作为晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一线治疗方案更为有效。它还可能抑制过度活跃的免疫反应,从而减少免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)。这项荟萃分析评估了 PD-(L)1 抑制剂联合化疗(I+C)与单独使用 PD-(L)1 抑制剂(I)相比发生 irAEs 的比率,并评估了 I+C 与 I 之间的间接相对风险(RR)。

方法

本研究的方案已在 PROSPERO(CRD42020139923)中注册。通过按样本量加权的单臂荟萃分析计算不同等级的 irAEs 的汇总发生率,并通过直接荟萃分析和间接治疗比较确定 RR。

结果

总体而言,I+C 发生 3 级或更高 irAEs 的比率低于 I(7.1% vs 10.6%;间接 RR,0.516;95%置信区间 [CI],0.291-0.916),尽管任何等级的 irAEs 均相似。I+C 治疗的肺炎发生率低于 I 治疗的任何等级(5.9% vs 7.1%;间接 RR,0.217;95%CI,0.080-0.588)和 3 级或更高。在内分泌系统中,与 I 相比,I+C 总体发生率较低(16.1% vs 20.1%;间接 RR,0.260;95%CI,0.120-0.564),而消化系统的 irAEs 与 I+C 和 I 相似。在其他系统中,与 I 相比,I+C 降低了皮疹等皮肤反应的发生率(10.4% vs 12.9%;间接 RR,0.474;95%CI,0.299-0.751)。与 I 相比,I+C 也降低了 3 级或更高皮肤反应(不包括皮疹)的发生率(1.1% vs 2.0%),间接 RR 为 0.158(95%CI,0.032-0.765),而其他包括的 irAEs 则相似。

结论

与单独使用 PD-L1 抑制剂相比,化疗联合 PD-(L)1 抑制剂作为 NSCLC 的一线治疗可降低大多数 irAEs(如肺炎、内分泌和皮肤反应)以及总体发生率。

简而言之

在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的一线治疗中,与单独使用程序性死亡受体 1/程序性死亡配体 1(PD-L1)抑制剂相比,化疗联合 PD-(L)1 抑制剂(I+C)是一种更有效的选择。添加化疗可能会降低免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)的发生率。因此,本文评估了 PD-(L)1 抑制剂联合化疗(I+C)与单独使用 PD-(L)1 抑制剂(I)相比发生 irAEs 的比率,并评估了 I+C 与 I 之间的间接相对风险(RR)。关键发现是,与单独使用 PD-(L)1 抑制剂相比,化疗联合 PD-(L)1 抑制剂(I+C)作为 NSCLC 的一线治疗方案可降低大多数 irAEs(如肺炎、内分泌和皮肤反应)以及总体发生率。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验