• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
2
[Application of transanal total mesorectal excision in radical surgery for rectal cancer].经肛门全直肠系膜切除术在直肠癌根治术中的应用
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2017 Aug 25;20(8):957-960.
3
[Safety and prognosis analysis of transanal total mesorectal excision versus laparoscopic mesorectal excision for mid-low rectal cancer].经肛门全直肠系膜切除术与腹腔镜直肠系膜切除术治疗中低位直肠癌的安全性及预后分析
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Jun 25;25(6):522-530. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn441530-20210811-00321.
4
Comparison of the short-term outcomes in lower rectal cancer using three different surgical techniques: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TME), laparoscopic TME, and open TME.三种不同手术技术治疗低位直肠癌的短期疗效比较:经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TME)、腹腔镜 TME 和开腹 TME。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Jun;42(6):674-680. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.09.008. Epub 2018 Oct 11.
5
Outcomes of open vs laparoscopic vs robotic vs transanal total mesorectal excision (TME) for rectal cancer: a network meta-analysis.直肠癌开放手术、腹腔镜手术、机器人手术与经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TME)的疗效:一项网状Meta分析。
Tech Coloproctol. 2023 May;27(5):345-360. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02739-1. Epub 2022 Dec 12.
6
Transanal down-to-up dissection of the distal rectum as a viable approach to achieve total mesorectal excision in laparoscopic sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer near the anus: a study of short- and long-term outcomes of 123 consecutive patients from a single Japanese institution.经肛门由下至上游离远端直肠以实现肛门附近直肠癌腹腔镜保肛手术中全直肠系膜切除术:来自日本单中心的 123 例连续患者的短期和长期结果研究。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Nov 15;20(1):363. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02826-5.
7
[Comparison of postoperative bowel function between patients undergoing transanal and laparoscopic total mesorectal excision].经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术患者术后肠功能的比较
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Mar 25;22(3):246-254.
8
Effect of transanal total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: comparison of short-term outcomes with laparoscopic and open surgeries.经肛门全直肠系膜切除术治疗直肠癌的效果:与腹腔镜和开放手术短期结局的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2018 May;32(5):2312-2321. doi: 10.1007/s00464-017-5926-x. Epub 2017 Nov 2.
9
Impact of trans-anal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision on the surgical and pathologic outcomes of patients with rectal cancer: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术对直肠癌患者手术和病理结局的影响:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Oct 20;408(1):413. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03147-1.
10
Comparison of pathological outcomes after transanal versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision: a prospective study using data from randomized control trial.经肛门与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术的病理结果比较:一项基于随机对照试验数据的前瞻性研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Sep;34(9):3956-3962. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07167-1. Epub 2019 Oct 4.

PMID:33119239
Abstract

Colorectal cancer is the third most commonly diagnosed cancer in Canada. In 2019 in Canada, colorectal cancer made up 13% of cancer cases in males, and 11% of cancer cases in females. Rectal cancer is a subset of colorectal cancer, and symptoms include changes in bowel habits, rectal bleeding, and weight loss. The treatment of rectal cancer can be challenging as what works for one patient may not work for another, additionally the five year survival of patients with advanced rectal cancer is 58%. The location of rectal cancer is defined by its distance from the anal verge (i.e., the junction of the anal canal and the external skin); lower or distal cancers are four to eight centimetres from the anal verge, middle rectal cancers are eight to 12 centimetres, and upper or proximal cancers are 12 to 15 centimetres from the anal verge. Surgery is one of the main therapies for rectal cancer, with the primary goal being complete removal of the tumour. The stage, size, and location of the tumour, and the patient’s characteristics (e.g., sex, BMI, skeletal morphology) can affect the choice of surgical approach for rectal cancer. Total mesorectal excision (TME), which involves the complete removal of the rectum and surrounding lymphatic tissue, is the standard of care for tumours in the distal to middle rectum. TME can be performed with open or laparoscopic techniques. Laparoscopic TME (LaTME) can be complicated by certain factors, such as the patient’s pelvic anatomy (i.e., a narrow pelvis), or obesity, thus reducing the surgeon’s ability to access the distal part of the rectum. In such cases, a laparoscopic procedure would need to be converted to the more invasive open TME procedure, which may result in worse short-term post-surgical outcomes. Transanal endoscopic surgery is a technique that offers access to rectal cancers through the anus. Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME), is a surgical procedure that combines the transanal endoscopic surgery approach with the LaTME procedure. TaTME facilitates the surgical treatment for distal and middle rectal cancers; the distal part of the rectum can be reached through the transanal approach, and the tumours in the middle rectum can be reached laparoscopically. The TaTME approach is a minimally invasive surgery for rectal cancer, and may facilitate access to tumours that are not amenable to the laparoscopic approach (e.g., patients who are obese, patients who have a narrow pelvis). In some Canadian hospitals, both the TME and the transanal endoscopic surgery are regularly used for rectal cancer, however, the TaTME procedure which combines both approaches is not widely used. The purpose of the report is to review and critically appraise the evidence pertaining to the clinical effectiveness and the cost-effectiveness of the TaTME for adult patients with middle to distal rectal cancer compared to open and laparoscopic TME. This information may be use used to inform decision making relating to clinical practice for the use of TaTME.

摘要