Kajubi Phoebe, Ruark Allison, Hearst Norman, Ruteikara Sam, Green Edward C
The Uganda Academy for Health Innovation & Impact, Infectious Diseases Institute, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda; Currently at Child Health and Development Centre, Makerere University, College of Health Sciences, Kampala, Uganda.
Department of Medicine, Brown University, Providence, USA; currently Department of Applied Health Sciences, Wheaton College, Wheaton, IL, USA.
Afr J AIDS Res. 2020 Sep;19(3):249-262. doi: 10.2989/16085906.2020.1811357.
Reducing multiple and concurrent partnerships has been identified as a priority in generalised HIV epidemics, yet developing successful interventions to bring about such behaviour change has proven challenging. We offered a three-session intervention aimed to improve couple relationship quality and address HIV risk factors, particularly concurrent sexual partnerships (CSP), in a peri-urban community of Kampala, Uganda. Before launching the intervention, a different group of community members participated in eight single-gender focus group discussions (FGDs) which explored issues of couple relationship quality and satisfaction. Findings from the FGDs guided the intervention. All 162 couples invited to the intervention completed a survey pre- and post-intervention. In FGDs, women and men discussed challenges faced in their relationships, including pervasive dissatisfaction, financial constraints, deception and lack of trust, poor communication, lack of sexual satisfaction, and concurrent sexual partnerships. A difference-in-difference analysis showed no measurable impact of the intervention on relationship quality or sexual risk behaviours over a six-month follow-up among 183 individuals who participated in the intervention, although many stated in response to open-ended questions that they had experienced positive relationship changes. Qualitative findings suggest high demand for couple-focused interventions but also reveal many individual-, couple-, community- and structural-level factors which contribute to women and men seeking concurrent sexual partnerships. More intensive interventions may be needed to overcome these barriers to behaviour change and reduce HIV risk. These findings also raise questions about how to interpret divergent qualitative and quantitative data, a topic which has received little attention in the literature.
减少多重和同时存在的性伴侣关系已被确定为艾滋病广泛流行地区的一项优先事项,但事实证明,制定成功的干预措施以促成这种行为改变具有挑战性。我们在乌干达坎帕拉的一个城郊社区提供了一个为期三阶段的干预措施,旨在改善夫妻关系质量并解决艾滋病风险因素,特别是同时存在的性伴侣关系(CSP)。在开展干预措施之前,另一组社区成员参加了八次单性别焦点小组讨论(FGD),探讨了夫妻关系质量和满意度问题。FGD的结果为干预措施提供了指导。所有受邀参加干预措施的162对夫妻在干预前后都完成了一项调查。在FGD中,男性和女性讨论了他们关系中面临的挑战,包括普遍的不满、经济限制、欺骗和缺乏信任、沟通不畅、性满意度低以及同时存在的性伴侣关系。差异分析表明,在参与干预措施的183个人的六个月随访中,干预措施对关系质量或性风险行为没有可衡量的影响,尽管许多人在回答开放式问题时表示他们经历了积极的关系变化。定性研究结果表明,对以夫妻为重点的干预措施有很高的需求,但也揭示了许多个人、夫妻、社区和结构层面的因素,这些因素导致男性和女性寻求同时存在的性伴侣关系。可能需要更深入的干预措施来克服这些行为改变的障碍并降低艾滋病风险。这些发现还引发了关于如何解释不同的定性和定量数据的问题,这一主题在文献中很少受到关注。