Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184, Rome, Italy.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Rome "La Sapienza", Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184, Rome, Italy.
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jan 15;278(Pt 1):111459. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111459. Epub 2020 Oct 26.
Anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic waste, although widely practiced, may require suitable accompanying treatments to enhance the degradability of complex materials. Since these may require significant efforts in terms of energy and chemical demand, careful assessment of their overall environmental sustainability is mandatory to evaluate their full-scale feasibility. The study aims to represent the environmental profile of ultrasonication (US) applied as a post-treatment of anaerobic digestion of agro-industrial organic residues. There is an interest in the US treatment for the processing of complex organic materials prior to AD in order to enhance the hydrolysis of complex organic substrates and increase the biogas yield of the biological process. An attributional, process-based life cycle assessment (LCA) study was applied to quantify and compare the potential environmental impacts of an AD plant, the biogas utilization options as well as the different digestate processing alternatives grouped into a set of 16 scenarios. Based on the results, upgrading of biogas and bio-methane use as vehicle fuel instead of energy generation from CHP or fuel cell was recommended due to the lower impact on GWP. Similarly, composting was a suitable option to reduce environmental impacts compared to belt drying. From the uncertainty analysis, AD without US as post-treatment proves to be more sustainable in terms of GWP compared to when US is used, showing net savings in GHG emissions especially when upgrading of biogas is applied. The analysis provides useful indications to policy makers to define sustainable management alternatives for organic residues as well as identify the environmental advantages associated with biogas utilization and digestate treatment and disposal alternatives.
厌氧消化(AD)虽然广泛应用于有机废物处理,但可能需要适当的伴随处理来增强复杂物料的可降解性。由于这些处理可能需要大量的能源和化学需求,因此必须对其整体环境可持续性进行仔细评估,以评估其在大规模应用的可行性。本研究旨在代表超声处理(US)作为农业工业有机残留物厌氧消化后处理的环境特征。人们对 US 处理感兴趣,是因为它可以在 AD 之前用于处理复杂的有机材料,以增强复杂有机底物的水解作用,并提高生物过程的沼气产量。本研究采用基于归因的过程生命周期评估(LCA)方法,以量化和比较 AD 工厂、沼气利用选项以及不同消化物处理替代方案的潜在环境影响,这些替代方案被分为 16 个情景。基于结果,建议将沼气升级为生物甲烷并用作车辆燃料,而不是用于热电联产或燃料电池的能源发电,因为这对全球变暖潜势的影响较低。同样,与带式干燥相比,堆肥是减少环境影响的合适选择。从不确定性分析来看,与 US 后处理相比,不进行 US 后处理的 AD 在全球变暖潜势方面更具可持续性,特别是在应用沼气升级时,温室气体排放的净节省量尤其明显。该分析为决策者提供了有用的指示,以确定有机残留物的可持续管理替代方案,并确定沼气利用和消化物处理和处置替代方案相关的环境优势。