Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, School of Health and Social Development, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Geelong, Melbourne, Burwood, Victoria, Australia.
N. Billich is with the Department of Nutrition Dietetics and Food, Monash University, Notting Hill, Victoria, Australia.
Nutr Rev. 2021 Sep 7;79(10):1165-1181. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuaa107.
Globally, the use of labels or signage targeting SSBs remains in its infancy and there is limited evidence available regarding its ability to decrease purchase and consumption of SSBs.
This systematic review aimed to synthesize the evidence on the effect of sugar- or health-related sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) warning labels or signage on knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs, and SSB purchase and consumption.
Nine databases - Ovid Medline, Emerald Insight, Scopus, Informit, Business Source Complete, CINAHL, Global Health, PsychINFO, and SocIndex - were searched along with grey literature from inception to December 2019. The PRISMA guidelines were applied for reporting this systematic review.
Studies examining the impact of front of pack (FOP) labels and/or point of sale (POS) signage highlighting added sugar content or its health risks were included.
Two authors independently extracted data on items, including study details, study design, population characteristics, intervention label details (type, duration, and settings), and outcomes measures. The Effective Public Health Practice Project tool was used to assess the study quality.
Findings were synthesized narratively.
Twenty-one studies published between 1992 and 2019 were included. Of these, 16 studies examined the impact of FOP labels and 5 studies examined the impact of POS signage. Both FOP labels and POS signage were associated with improved health knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs regarding SSBs and reduced SSB purchases. Warning labels with diet-related health consequences were found to be particularly effective. Overall quality of studies was assessed as mixed.
Health- or sugar-related FOP labels and POS signage for SSBs are promising public health measures and may improve consumers' health behaviors toward reduced SSB purchase and consumption.
全球范围内,针对 SSB 的标签或标识的使用仍处于起步阶段,关于其降低 SSB 购买和消费能力的证据有限。
本系统评价旨在综合有关糖或与健康相关的含糖饮料(SSB)警示标签或标识对知识、态度和信念以及 SSB 购买和消费影响的证据。
从 1992 年到 2019 年 12 月,通过 Ovid Medline、Emerald Insight、Scopus、Informit、Business Source Complete、CINAHL、Global Health、PsychINFO 和 SocIndex 等 9 个数据库以及灰色文献进行了搜索。本系统评价报告遵循 PRISMA 指南。
纳入了研究 SSB 标签和/或销售点(POS)标识对添加糖含量或其健康风险突出显示影响的前瞻性包装(FOP)标签和/或 POS 标识的影响的研究。
两名作者独立提取了有关研究细节、研究设计、人口特征、干预标签细节(类型、持续时间和设置)和结果测量的研究数据。使用有效公共卫生实践项目工具评估研究质量。
结果以叙述性方式进行综合。
纳入了 1992 年至 2019 年期间发表的 21 项研究。其中,16 项研究检验了 FOP 标签的影响,5 项研究检验了 POS 标识的影响。FOP 标签和 POS 标识都与 SSB 健康知识、态度和信念的改善以及 SSB 购买量的减少有关。带有饮食相关健康后果的警示标签被发现特别有效。总体而言,研究质量评估为混合。
针对 SSB 的健康或糖相关 FOP 标签和 POS 标识是有前途的公共卫生措施,可能会改善消费者减少 SSB 购买和消费的健康行为。