Cornea and Anterior Segment Services, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Ophthalmic Biophysics, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;68(11):2445-2450. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_71_20.
To evaluate the clinico-microbiological profile, donor cornea risk factors, and outcomes of postkeratoplasty endophthalmitis at a tertiary care center.
Retrospective analysis of charts of 28 consecutive patients (28 eyes) of acute endophthalmitis following either an endothelial keratoplasty (EK) or an optical penetrating keratoplasty (PK) surgery, performed between 2006 and 2018 (13-year period). Positive microbiology, identification and classification of predisposing factors, surveillance of utilized paired donors, treatment outcomes, and differences in the rate and severity of the event between optical penetrating and endothelial keratoplasty.
The estimated incidence of endophthalmitis was 0.23% in the entire cohort; it was 0.34% and 0.15%, after EK and PK, respectively (P = 0.049). The median time of endophthalmitis was 4.5 days postsurgery. Donor-related endophthalmitis was recognized in 7/28 (25%) eyes. Culture positivity was 68% (n = 19 of 28). Bacteria was isolated in 84% (n = 16 of 19) instances; Gram-negative bacilli were more common (87.5%; 14 of 16), and Pseudomonas species (50%; 7 of 14) was the most common Gram-negative bacterium. Majority (>75%) of the Gram-negative bacteria were resistant to all fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, 3 generation cephalosporins, and meropenam; 1/3 were resistant to imipenem; and 90% were sensitive to colistin. Treatment included intraocular antibiotic injections (96.4%), vitrectomy (42.9%), and therapeutic keratoplasty (50%). In 85.7% (24 of 28), globe was salvaged. The final vision was 20/200 or better in 39.1% (9 of 23) eyes.
EK carried a higher risk of endophthalmitis than PK in this cohort. Bacterial infection was more common in this series, with Gram negative bacilli being the commonest organisms. Multidrug resistance was common (~75%) in Gram negative isolates.
评估一家三级护理中心角膜移植术后眼内炎的临床-微生物学特征、供体角膜危险因素和结局。
回顾性分析 2006 年至 2018 年间(13 年期间)行内皮或穿透性角膜移植术后发生急性眼内炎的 28 例(28 只眼)连续患者的病历。对阳性微生物学、易患因素的鉴定和分类、配对供体的监测、治疗结果以及穿透性角膜移植和内皮角膜移植术后事件的发生率和严重程度差异进行分析。
在整个队列中,眼内炎的估计发生率为 0.23%;行内皮角膜移植术和穿透性角膜移植术后,眼内炎的发生率分别为 0.34%和 0.15%(P = 0.049)。眼内炎发生的中位时间为术后 4.5 天。在 28 只眼中,有 7 只(25%)眼为供体相关性眼内炎。培养阳性率为 68%(28 例中有 19 例)。在 19 例培养阳性的病例中,有 84%(16 例)分离出细菌;革兰氏阴性杆菌更为常见(87.5%,14 例中有 16 例),其中铜绿假单胞菌(50%,14 例中有 7 例)是最常见的革兰氏阴性菌。大多数(>75%)革兰氏阴性菌对所有氟喹诺酮类、氨基糖苷类、三代头孢菌素类和美罗培南均耐药;1/3对亚胺培南耐药;90%对黏菌素敏感。治疗包括眼内抗生素注射(96.4%)、玻璃体切除术(42.9%)和治疗性角膜移植术(50%)。在 28 例患者中,有 85.7%(24 例)眼球得以保留。在 23 例患者中,最终视力达到 20/200 或以上的有 39.1%(9 例)。
在本研究中,内皮角膜移植术的眼内炎发生率高于穿透性角膜移植术。在本系列中,细菌感染更为常见,革兰氏阴性杆菌是最常见的病原体。革兰氏阴性菌分离株的多重耐药性较为常见(~75%)。