Suppr超能文献

与单一疗法相比,α受体阻滞剂和磷酸二酯酶-5抑制剂联合治疗下尿路症状的疗效和耐受性:系统评价和网络荟萃分析方案

Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with alpha-blockers and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors compared with monotherapy for lower urinary tract symptoms: Protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Qiangzhao Liu, Xiaofeng Zhang, Fenghai Zhou, Qiong Lian, Fa Zhang, Bohong Guo, Xinsheng Xi

机构信息

Department of Urology, Gansu Provincial Hospital.

Department of Radiology, Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, P.R. China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22834. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022834.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy consisting of α-blockers and different phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors for lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) by performing a network meta-analysis.

METHOD

Relevant articles were retrieved from the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and EMBASE databases. Bayesian network meta-analyses were performed with a random-effect model to compare the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with α-blockers and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors for LUTS. The odds ratio (OR), mean difference (MD) and surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) were calculated with the GeMTC R package.

RESULTS

Twenty randomized trials with 4131 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Based on the SUCRA values, vardenafil (10 mg) combined with α-blockers ranked first, first and sixth; sildenafil (25 mg) combined with α-blockers ranked second, third and first; and tadalafil (20 mg) combined with α-blockers ranked third, second and fourth in IPSS, post void residual, and maximum flow rate, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapy with α-blockers and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors was effective and well tolerated for LUTS. For men who prioritize high efficacy, vardenafil (10 mg) combined with α-blockers seems to be the treatment of choice. For men wishing to optimize minimally invasive treatment, sildenafil (25 mg) and tadalafil (20 mg) combined with α-blockers appears to have a possible advantage in terms of avoiding adverse effects.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在通过进行网状Meta分析,比较α受体阻滞剂与不同类型5型磷酸二酯酶抑制剂联合治疗下尿路症状(LUTS)的疗效和安全性。

方法

从Cochrane图书馆、PubMed和EMBASE数据库中检索相关文章。采用随机效应模型进行贝叶斯网状Meta分析,以比较α受体阻滞剂与5型磷酸二酯酶抑制剂联合治疗LUTS的疗效和安全性。使用GeMTC R软件包计算比值比(OR)、平均差(MD)和累积排序曲线下面积(SUCRA)。

结果

本网状Meta分析纳入了20项随机试验,共4131例患者。根据SUCRA值,伐地那非(10毫克)联合α受体阻滞剂在国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、排尿后残余尿量和最大尿流率方面分别排名第一、第一和第六;西地那非(25毫克)联合α受体阻滞剂分别排名第二、第三和第一;他达拉非(20毫克)联合α受体阻滞剂分别排名第三、第二和第四。

结论

α受体阻滞剂与5型磷酸二酯酶抑制剂联合治疗LUTS有效且耐受性良好。对于优先考虑高疗效的男性,伐地那非(10毫克)联合α受体阻滞剂似乎是首选治疗方法。对于希望优化微创治疗的男性,西地那非(25毫克)和他达拉非(20毫克)联合α受体阻滞剂在避免不良反应方面可能具有优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb42/7581165/6b416cf8d5db/medi-99-e22834-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验