Suppr超能文献

定义磷酸二酯酶 5 抑制剂联合坦索罗辛治疗良性前列腺增生伴或不伴勃起功能障碍下尿路症状的疗效和安全性:网络荟萃分析。

Defining the Efficacy and Safety of Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitors with Tamsulosin for the Treatment of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia with or without Erectile Dysfunction: A Network Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No 1. Shuaifuyuan Beijing, China.

出版信息

Biomed Res Int. 2020 Mar 26;2020:1419520. doi: 10.1155/2020/1419520. eCollection 2020.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the relative safety and efficacy of different types of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors (PDE5-Is) with tamsulosin for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) secondary to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) (BPH-LUTS) with or without erectile dysfunction (ED).

METHODS

We use the Stata version 13.0 to conduct the network meta-analysis (NMA) with a random effects model of the Bayesian framework. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), Maximum Urinary Flow Fate ( ), International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF), and their credible intervals (CI) were used to compare the efficacy and safety of every medical intervention, including sildenafil plus tamsulosin, tadalafil plus tamsulosin, and vardenafil plus tamsulosin.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs including 531 participants with seven interventions were analyzed. The results of NMA SUCRA showed that compared with different doses or types of PDE5-Is combined with tamsulosin (0.4 mg qd), the sildenafil (25 mg qd) combined with tamsulosin (0.4 mg qd) group had the greatest probabilities of being the best in the achievement of improving IIEF. The sildenafil (25 mg 4 days per week) combined with tamsulosin (0.4 mg qd) group had the greatest probabilities of being the best in the achievement of improving , whereas sildenafil (25 mg qd) combined with tamsulosin (0.4 mg qd) ranked the best for the safety outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis indicates that sildenafil combined with tamsulosin is the best effective and tolerated treatment option for BPH-LUTS with or without ED. Further RCTs are strongly required to provide more direct evidence.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较不同类型的磷酸二酯酶 5 抑制剂(PDE5-Is)与坦索罗辛治疗伴有或不伴有勃起功能障碍(ED)的良性前列腺增生(BPH)相关下尿路症状(LUTS)的相对安全性和疗效。

方法

我们使用 Stata 版本 13.0 对贝叶斯框架下的随机效应模型进行网络荟萃分析(NMA)。国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、最大尿流率( )、国际勃起功能指数(IIEF)及其可信区间(CI)用于比较每一种医学干预的疗效和安全性,包括西地那非联合坦索罗辛、他达拉非联合坦索罗辛和伐地那非联合坦索罗辛。

结果

共纳入 7 项 RCT 研究,包含 531 名参与者和 7 种干预措施。NMA SUCRA 结果显示,与不同剂量或类型的 PDE5-Is 联合坦索罗辛(0.4 mg qd)相比,西地那非(25 mg qd)联合坦索罗辛(0.4 mg qd)组在改善 IIEF 方面最有可能成为最佳选择。西地那非(25 mg,每周 4 天)联合坦索罗辛(0.4 mg qd)组在改善 方面最有可能成为最佳选择,而西地那非(25 mg qd)联合坦索罗辛(0.4 mg qd)在安全性结局方面排名最佳。

结论

本荟萃分析表明,西地那非联合坦索罗辛是治疗伴有或不伴有 ED 的 BPH-LUTS 的最佳有效且耐受的治疗选择。需要进一步的 RCT 来提供更直接的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d0b5/7140123/c8cb0ab17dda/BMRI2020-1419520.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验