Bergh Eric P, Tsao Kuojen, Austin Mary T, Fletcher Stephen A, Lopez Suzanne M, Moise Kenneth J, Johnson Anthony, Papanna Ramesha
Departments Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences and Pediatric Surgery, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Departments of Pediatric Surgery and Obstetrics, Gynecology & Reproductive Sciences, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and Children's Memorial Hermann Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
J Clin Med. 2020 Oct 27;9(11):3443. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113443.
Maternal and pediatric delivery outcomes may vary in patients who underwent open fetal myelomeningocele repair and elected to deliver at the fetal center where their fetal intervention was performed versus at the referring physician's hospital. A prospective cohort study of 88 patients were evaluated following in utero open fetal myelomeningocele repair at a single fetal center between the years 2011-2019. Exclusion criteria included patients that delivered within two weeks of the procedure ( = 6), or if a patient was lost to follow-up ( = 1). Of 82 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 36 (44%) patients were delivered at the fetal center that performed fetal intervention, and 46 (56%) were delivered locally. Comparative statistics found that with the exception of parity, baseline characteristics and pre-operative variables did not differ between the groups. No differences in oligohydramnios incidence, preterm rupture of membranes, gestational age at delivery or delivery indications were found. Patients who delivered with a referring physician were more likely to be multiparous ( = 0.015). With the exception of a longer neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) stay in the fetal center group (median 30.0 vs. 11.0 days, = 0.004), there were no differences in neonatal outcomes, including wound dehiscence, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, patch management, ventricular diversion, or prematurity complications. Therefore, we conclude that it is safe to allow patients to travel home for obstetric and neonatal management after open fetal myelomeningocele repair.
对于接受开放性胎儿脊髓脊膜膨出修复术并选择在进行胎儿干预的胎儿中心分娩的患者,与在转诊医生所在医院分娩的患者相比,母婴分娩结局可能有所不同。对2011年至2019年间在单一胎儿中心接受宫内开放性胎儿脊髓脊膜膨出修复术的88例患者进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。排除标准包括在手术后两周内分娩的患者(n = 6),或失访的患者(n = 1)。在82例符合纳入标准的患者中,36例(44%)在进行胎儿干预的胎儿中心分娩,46例(56%)在当地分娩。比较统计发现,除了产次外,两组之间的基线特征和术前变量没有差异。在羊水过少发生率、胎膜早破、分娩时的孕周或分娩指征方面未发现差异。由转诊医生接生的患者多产的可能性更大(P = 0.015)。除了胎儿中心组的新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)住院时间更长(中位数30.0天对11.0天,P = 0.004)外,在新生儿结局方面没有差异,包括伤口裂开、脑脊液漏、补片处理脑室分流或早产并发症。因此,我们得出结论,开放性胎儿脊髓脊膜膨出修复术后允许患者回家进行产科和新生儿管理是安全的。